NCT01151215

Brief Summary

The main purpose of this study is to compare progression free survival in patients treated with AZD8931 given in combination with anastrozole versus anastrozole alone. The secondary objective is to investigate the safety and tolerability of AZD8931 given in combination with anastrozole.

Trial Health

68
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
482

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2010

Geographic Reach
18 countries

60 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2010

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2010

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2010

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 8, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 25, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

June 15, 2010

Results QC Date

January 29, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Cancertumourbreast cancermetastaticsecondarylocally advanced

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Progression Free Survival as Evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1

    Time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression (as per RECIST 1.1) or the date of death (by any cause in the absence of progression). Disease progression is defined using RECIST 1.1 as \>=20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of \>=5mm, taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters of target lesions since study start, or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions, or appearance of any new lesions.

    Tumour assessment by RECIST 1.1 every 12 weeks until data cut-off at 31 August 2012

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the Overall Survival in Patients Treated With AZD8931 in Combination With Anastrozole Versus Anastrozole Alone

    Following progression, patients were contacted at 12 weekly intervals until data cut-off at 31 August 2012 to determine survival status

Study Arms (3)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD8931 40mg (bd) plus anastrozole 1mg (od)

Drug: AZD8931Drug: anastrozole

2

EXPERIMENTAL

AZD8931 20mg (bd) plus anastrozole 1mg (od)

Drug: AZD8931Drug: anastrozole

3

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo (bd) plus anastrozole 1mg (od)

Drug: anastrozoleDrug: Placebo

Interventions

Tablet, oral, bd

12

Tablet, oral, od

Also known as: Arimidex
123

Tablet, oral

3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients that have locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Lesions should not be amenable to surgery or radiation of curative intent
  • Hormone therapy-naive
  • Estimated life expectancy of more than 12 weeks

You may not qualify if:

  • Last dose of prior anti-cancer therapy received within 14 days (or longer if required)
  • Any eye injury or corneal surgery within 3 months prior to receiving first dose of study drug.
  • Currently receiving (and unwilling to discontinue) oestrogen replacement therapy. (last dose \<7 days prior to randomisation)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (60)

Research Site

Lake Success, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Goiânia, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Ijuí, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Location

Research Site

São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Research Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Location

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Research Site

Brno, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Olomouc, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Prague, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Helsinki, Finland

Location

Research Site

Tampere, Finland

Location

Research Site

Turku, Finland

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, India

Location

Research Site

Hyderabad, India

Location

Research Site

Mumbai, India

Location

Research Site

Pune, India

Location

Research Site

Trivandrum, India

Location

Research Site

Vellore, India

Location

Research Site

Niigata, Japan

Location

Research Site

Osaka, Japan

Location

Research Site

Ota-shi, Japan

Location

Research Site

Sapporo, Japan

Location

Research Site

Durango, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Juchitán, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Mérida, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Monterrey, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Callao, Peru

Location

Research Site

Lima, Peru

Location

Research Site

Piura, Peru

Location

Research Site

Iloilo City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Lipa City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Pasay, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Quezon City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Research Site

Elblag, Poland

Location

Research Site

Krakow, Poland

Location

Research Site

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Research Site

Kuzmolovsky, Russia

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research Site

Durban, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Pretoria, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Bangkok, Thailand

Location

Research Site

Songkhla, Thailand

Location

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Lviv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Bournemouth, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Coventry, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Leicester, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

London, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Nottingham, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Surrey, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Johnston S, Basik M, Hegg R, Lausoontornsiri W, Grzeda L, Clemons M, Dreosti L, Mann H, Stuart M, Cristofanilli M. Inhibition of EGFR, HER2, and HER3 signaling with AZD8931 in combination with anastrozole as an anticancer approach: Phase II randomized study in women with endocrine-therapy-naive advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Nov;160(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3979-5. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsNeoplasm Metastasis

Interventions

AZD 8931Anastrozole

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesNeoplastic ProcessesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NitrilesOrganic ChemicalsTriazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

The final analysis for this study is the analysis that was sent to the study's IDMC, based on a data cut-off of 31 August 2012. At the data cut-off point the data was cleaned, but 9 adverse events were not coded. These events are not included here.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Serban Ghiorghiu
Organization
Astrazeneca

Study Officials

  • Dr Serban Ghiorghiu, MD

    AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Stephen Johnston, MA, PhD, FRCP

    The Royal Marsden Hospital, London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2010

First Posted

June 28, 2010

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion

January 1, 2013

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

July 25, 2014

Results First Posted

May 8, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-07

Locations