Dose Response of a Tubule Occlusion Agent
An Exploratory Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Two Currently Marketed Toothpastes Containing Different Concentrations of a Tubule Occlusion Agent
1 other identifier
interventional
195
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy of two different concentrations of a tubule occlusion agent - calcium sodium phosphosilicate in treatment of dentine hypersensitivity
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 3, 2013
CompletedJune 3, 2013
April 1, 2013
3 months
February 23, 2010
September 23, 2011
April 25, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 15
Response to a constant jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score and a change of greater than 25 mm in VAS indicates potential relevant clinical significance of treatment.
Baseline to Day 15
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Water Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 15
Response of exposed dentine surface to application of 1 ml freshly melted ice cold water was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score and a change of greater than 25 mm in VAS indicates potential relevant clinical significance of treatment.
Baseline to Day 15
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 7
Baseline to Day 7
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Water Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 7
Baseline to Day 7
Other Outcomes (4)
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 10
Baseline to Day 10
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Water Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 10
Baseline to Day 10
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 3
Baseline to Day 3
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants to brush their teeth for two minutes, twice daily for 15 days with 5% sodium calcium phosphosilicate toothpaste.
7.5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants to brush their teeth for two minutes, twice daily for 15 days with 7.5% sodium calcium phosphosilicate toothpaste.
Placebo toothpaste
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants to brush their teeth for two minutes, twice daily for 15 days with placebo toothpaste.
Interventions
Low concentration calcium sodium phosphosilicate tubule occlusion agent
High concentration calcium sodium phosphosilicate tubule occlusion agent
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Consent: Demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
- Age: Aged between 20 - 50 years.
- General Health: Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history.
- Contraception: Females of childbearing potential who are, in the opinion of the investigator, practising a reliable method of contraception.
- Erosion/Abrasion/Recession:Study teeth must show signs of facial/cervical erosion, abrasion and/or gingival recession.
- Gingival Health / Tooth Mobility Grade:Study teeth must have Löe and Silness Gingival Index (GI) score less than or equal to 2 and clinical mobility less than or equal to grade I.
- Current Product Use: Participants must have been using the same brand of toothpaste for at least 2 months and should not have used desensitizing toothpaste during the 4 weeks preceding screening. Participants will be required to bring in their current toothpaste(s) in order to verify the ingredients.
- VAS Training: Successfully completes the VAS training exercise at Screening.
- Compliance: Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy: Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study.
- Breast-feeding: Women who are breast-feeding.
- Medical History: a) Chronic debilitating disease is present b)Chronic disease or other condition is present that is associated with intermittent episodes or constant daily pain, such as arthritis, low back pain, dysmenorrhea, etc.
- Medications: Daily doses of medication, which in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the perception of pain, are being taken. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquilizers, mood-altering and anti-inflammatory drugs.
- Allergy/Intolerance: Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
- Clinical Study/Experimental Medication: a) Participation in another clinical study or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit.b) Previous participation in this study.
- Xerostomia: Any condition or medication that causes xerostomia.
- Personnel: An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family.
- Other: Any subject who in the opinion of the investigator, should not participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (1)
University Park Research Center (UPRC)
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
An issue with study product packaging was discovered post-study completion. The nature indicated that subject response was likely to have been liable to a positive bias. Efficacy cannot be considered as valid and no reliable conclusions possible.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2010
First Posted
February 25, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2009
Study Completion
March 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 3, 2013
Results First Posted
June 3, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04