NCT01075256

Brief Summary

To evaluate the efficacy of two different concentrations of a tubule occlusion agent - calcium sodium phosphosilicate in treatment of dentine hypersensitivity

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
195

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2008

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2009

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 25, 2010

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 3, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 3, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

February 23, 2010

Results QC Date

September 23, 2011

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

sensitivityocclusion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 15

    Response to a constant jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score and a change of greater than 25 mm in VAS indicates potential relevant clinical significance of treatment.

    Baseline to Day 15

  • Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Water Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 15

    Response of exposed dentine surface to application of 1 ml freshly melted ice cold water was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score and a change of greater than 25 mm in VAS indicates potential relevant clinical significance of treatment.

    Baseline to Day 15

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 7

    Baseline to Day 7

  • Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Water Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 7

    Baseline to Day 7

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 10

    Baseline to Day 10

  • Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Water Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 10

    Baseline to Day 10

  • Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a VAS at Day 3

    Baseline to Day 3

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants to brush their teeth for two minutes, twice daily for 15 days with 5% sodium calcium phosphosilicate toothpaste.

Device: 5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste

7.5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants to brush their teeth for two minutes, twice daily for 15 days with 7.5% sodium calcium phosphosilicate toothpaste.

Device: 7.5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste

Placebo toothpaste

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants to brush their teeth for two minutes, twice daily for 15 days with placebo toothpaste.

Device: Placebo toothpaste

Interventions

Low concentration calcium sodium phosphosilicate tubule occlusion agent

5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste

High concentration calcium sodium phosphosilicate tubule occlusion agent

7.5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste

Placebo toothpaste

Placebo toothpaste

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Consent: Demonstrates understanding of the study and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form.
  • Age: Aged between 20 - 50 years.
  • General Health: Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history.
  • Contraception: Females of childbearing potential who are, in the opinion of the investigator, practising a reliable method of contraception.
  • Erosion/Abrasion/Recession:Study teeth must show signs of facial/cervical erosion, abrasion and/or gingival recession.
  • Gingival Health / Tooth Mobility Grade:Study teeth must have Löe and Silness Gingival Index (GI) score less than or equal to 2 and clinical mobility less than or equal to grade I.
  • Current Product Use: Participants must have been using the same brand of toothpaste for at least 2 months and should not have used desensitizing toothpaste during the 4 weeks preceding screening. Participants will be required to bring in their current toothpaste(s) in order to verify the ingredients.
  • VAS Training: Successfully completes the VAS training exercise at Screening.
  • Compliance: Understands and is willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy: Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study.
  • Breast-feeding: Women who are breast-feeding.
  • Medical History: a) Chronic debilitating disease is present b)Chronic disease or other condition is present that is associated with intermittent episodes or constant daily pain, such as arthritis, low back pain, dysmenorrhea, etc.
  • Medications: Daily doses of medication, which in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the perception of pain, are being taken. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquilizers, mood-altering and anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • Allergy/Intolerance: Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • Clinical Study/Experimental Medication: a) Participation in another clinical study or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit.b) Previous participation in this study.
  • Xerostomia: Any condition or medication that causes xerostomia.
  • Personnel: An employee of the sponsor or the study site or members of their immediate family.
  • Other: Any subject who in the opinion of the investigator, should not participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Park Research Center (UPRC)

Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dentin SensitivityToothacheHypersensitivityBites and Stings

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesFacial PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsImmune System DiseasesPoisoningChemically-Induced DisordersWounds and Injuries

Limitations and Caveats

An issue with study product packaging was discovered post-study completion. The nature indicated that subject response was likely to have been liable to a positive bias. Efficacy cannot be considered as valid and no reliable conclusions possible.

Results Point of Contact

Title
GSK Response Center
Organization
GlaxoSmithKline

Study Officials

  • GSK Clinical Trials

    GlaxoSmithKline

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2010

First Posted

February 25, 2010

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion

March 1, 2009

Study Completion

March 1, 2009

Last Updated

June 3, 2013

Results First Posted

June 3, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-04

Locations