NCT01691560

Brief Summary

The purpose of this exploratory study is to compare the treatment effect on dentinal hypersensitivity of a tubule occluding dentifrice as measured by Schiff and Tactile sensitivity. This proof of concept study will compare the test dentifrice with three other treatment groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2012

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 29, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

May 29, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 20, 2012

Results QC Date

May 1, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 4

    Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responds to air stimulus and request discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responds to air stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.

    Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

  • Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 4

    Response to increasing force on hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Yeaple Probe pain response scale. In tactile sensitivity assessment, an increasing force is applied to hypersensitive tooth until a yes response was recorded or the maximum force was reached.

    Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

  • Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 8

    Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant does not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responds to air stimulus and request discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responds to air stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.

    Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

  • Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity Pain Response (g) at Week 8

    Response to increasing force on hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Yeaple Probe pain response scale. In tactile sensitivity assessment, an increasing force is applied to hypersensitive tooth until a yes response was recorded or the maximum force was reached.

    Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

  • Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Response on a Visual Rating Scale (VRS) at Week 4

    Participants rated the intensity of their response to the stimulus using a 10 point Visual rating scale of 1 (no Pain) to 10 (intense pain).

    Baseline to 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

  • Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Response on VRS at Week 8

    Participants rated the intensity of their response to the stimulus using a 10 point VRS of 1 (no Pain) to 10 (intense pain).

    Baseline to 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

Study Arms (4)

5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/sodium monofluorophosphate

EXPERIMENTAL

Dentifrice containing 5.0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate with sodium monofluorophosphate containing 1500 parts per million fluoride (ppmF).

Drug: 5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice

0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/sodium monofluorophosphate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dentifrice containing 0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate

Drug: 0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice

Sodium monofluorophosphate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dentifrice containing 1000 ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate

Drug: Sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice

Sodium fluoride

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dentifrice containing 1100 ppmF as sodium fluoride

Drug: Sodium fluoride dentifrice

Interventions

Dentifrice containing 5.0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate

5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/sodium monofluorophosphate

Dentifrice containing 0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate

0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/sodium monofluorophosphate

Dentifrice containing 1000 ppmF as sodium monofluorophosphate

Sodium monofluorophosphate

Dentifrice containing 1100 ppmF as sodium fluoride

Sodium fluoride

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants between 18 and 55 years of age, in good general health, with pre-existing self-reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity are required for entry into the study
  • Participants will be required to have at least four teeth with facial/cervical erosion, abrasion and/or gingival recession which respond to qualifying evaporative (air) assessment at the Screening visit and have at least two teeth (incisors, canines or pre-molars) demonstrating signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile threshold (Yeaple ≤ 20 gram (g)) and evaporative (air) (Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2) assessments at the Baseline visit

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy: Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study.
  • Breast-feeding: Women who are breast-feeding.
  • Medical History: a) Chronic debilitating disease is present b) Chronic disease or other condition is present that is associated with intermittent episodes or constant daily pain, such as arthritis, low back pain, dysmenorrhea, etc.
  • Medications: Daily doses of medication, which in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the perception of pain, are being taken. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquilizers, mood-altering and anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • Allergy/Intolerance: Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • Clinical Study/Experimental Medication: a) Participation in another clinical study or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit b) Previous participation in this study.
  • Other: Any subject who in the opinion of the investigator, should not participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

BioSci Research America

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121-5466, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
GSK Response Center
Organization
GlaxoSmithKline

Study Officials

  • GSK Clinical Trials

    GlaxoSmithKline

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2012

First Posted

September 24, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

November 1, 2012

Study Completion

November 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 29, 2014

Results First Posted

May 29, 2014

Record last verified: 2013-07

Locations