Efficacy of Potassium Nitrate Solution in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity
A Proof of Principle Study Investigating the Effects of a Potassium Nitrate Solution in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
An exploratory study investigating the direct application of potassium nitrate (KNO3) solutions of different concentrations in reducing dentine hypersensitivity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 26, 2015
CompletedJanuary 26, 2015
January 1, 2015
1 month
April 30, 2010
March 21, 2013
January 22, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Between Treatment Comparison of the Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline of Response to Evaporative (Air) Stimuli Immediately Following Treatment on Day 5 Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in 5% Potassium Nitrate Solution and 2.5% Potassium Nitrate Solution
Response to a one second application of air from a standard dental unit syringe applied to the surface of hypersensitive tooth. After each stimuli participant rated the intensity of pain on a 100 millimeter VAS, on which 0 represented "no pain" and 100 represented the" worst pain imaginable". Change from baseline was calculated as mean score at the given time point minus mean score at baseline.
Baseline and immediately after treatment on Day 5
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Between Treatment Comparison of the Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline of Response to Evaporative (Air) Stimuli Immediately Following Treatment on Day 1 Using a VAS
Baseline and immediately after treatment on Day 1
Between Treatment Comparison of the Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline of Response to Evaporative (Air) Stimuli at 10 Mins Post Treatment on Day 1 Using a VAS
Baseline and 10 mins post treatment on Day 1
Between Treatment Comparison of the Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline of Response to Evaporative (Air) Stimuli at 20 Mins Post Treatment on Day 1 Using a VAS.
Baseline and 20 mins post treatment on Day 1
Between Treatment Comparison of the Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline of Response to Evaporative (Air) Stimuli Following Treatment on Day 2 Using a VAS
Baseline and immediately after treatment on Day 2
Between Treatment Comparison of the Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline of Response to Evaporative (Air) Stimuli at 10 Mins Post Treatment on Day 2 Using a VAS
Baseline and 10 mins post treatment on Day 2
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
5% KNO3 solution
EXPERIMENTALParticipants to apply 5% potassium nitrate solution to a single sensitive tooth for two minutes, in each of the five day treatment period.
2.5% KNO3 solution
EXPERIMENTALParticipants to apply 2.5% potassium nitrate solution to a single sensitive tooth for two minutes, in each of the five day treatment period.
Sterile Water
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants to apply sterile water to a single sensitive tooth for two minutes, in each of the five day treatment period.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months and a primary complaint of sensitive teeth
- Three teeth that can be isolated that meet all of the following criteria at the screening visit:
- Teeth showing signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion. Study teeth must exhibit greater than or equal to 3 mm recession at the facial surface midpoint
- Teeth must be visually stain and calculus free
- Teeth having a gingival index score of less than or equal to 2
- Teeth with a clinical mobility less than or equal to 1
- Teeth that show signs of sensitivity, evaporative (air) sensitive teeth displaying a response of greater than or equal to 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic disease or other condition that is associated with intermittent episodes of constant daily pain, such as arthritis, low back pain, etc.
- An condition or medication that causes xerostomia as determined by investigator
- Sensitive teeth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator
- Teeth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations
- Teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures
- Teeth with full crowns, orthodontic bands, extensive caries or cracked enamel
- Sensitive teeth with contributing etiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine.
- Dental prophylaxis within 3 weeks of the screening visit
- Tongue or lip piercing or presence of dental implants
- Subjects not using the same brand of toothpaste for at least 4 months prior to the screening visit
- Subjects who have used desensitizing toothpaste during the 4 weeks before Treatment Visit 1
- Taking daily dose of medication which may interfere with the perception of pain. Examples of such medications include analgesics, anticonvulsants, antihistamines that cause marked or moderate sedation, sedatives, tranquillizers, mood-altering drugs or anti-inflammatory drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (1)
University Park Research Center (UPRC)
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2010
First Posted
May 4, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 26, 2015
Results First Posted
January 26, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01