The Effects of Potassium Nitrate in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity
An Exploratory Study Investigating the Effects of a Potassium Nitrate Solution in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized, controlled, double blind exploratory study to explore the effects of two different potassium nitrate concentrations and water on exposed dentine in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity. Solutions will be applied for either 2, 5 or 10 minutes and assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) scores following evaporative (air) stimulus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Feb 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 28, 2015
CompletedApril 28, 2015
March 1, 2013
2 months
November 17, 2011
March 21, 2013
April 9, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Sensitivity Pain Response of Hypersensitive Tooth on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Immediately Post Application of 5% KNO3 Solution, 2.5% KNO3 Solution and Sterile Water
Response to a constant jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score immediately post treatment.
Baseline, immediately post administration of treatment
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Sensitivity Pain Response of Hypersensitive Tooth on a VAS, 10 Minutes Post Application of 5% KNO3 Solution, 2.5% KNO3 Solution and Sterile Water
Response to a constant (duration, pressure, temperature, distance from target) jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score at 10 minutes post treatment.
Baseline, 10 minutes post administration of treatment
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Sensitivity Pain Response of Hypersensitive Tooth on a VAS, 20 Minute Post Application of 5% KNO3 Solution, 2.5% KNO3 Solution and Sterile Water
Response to a constant (duration, pressure, temperature, distance from target) jet of air applied to a hypersensitive tooth was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for stimulated tooth ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (intense pain). Change from baseline in pain response was calculated using VAS score at 20 minutes post treatment.
Baseline, 20 minutes post administration of treatment
Study Arms (3)
Sterile water
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants to receive 250 microlitres (μL) of sterile water.
Potassium nitrate 5% solution
EXPERIMENTALParticipants to receive 250 μL of potassium nitrate 5% solution.
Potassium nitrate 2.5% solution
EXPERIMENTALParticipants to receive 250 μL of potassium nitrate 2.5% solution.
Interventions
250 μL of Potassium nitrate solution (either 5% or 2.5%)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- General Health and Oral Heath: Good general health and oral health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history.
- Teeth: Presence of teeth in various locations in the mouth to determine stent success. Required teeth include: at least three first molars; a maxillary incisor, cuspid and bicuspid; and a mandibular incisor, cuspid and bicuspid.
- Dental Sensitivity: a) Self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months and a primary complaint of sensitive teeth. b) A minimum of three accessible teeth that can be isolated that meet all of the following criteria at the screening visit: i. Teeth showing signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion. Study teeth must exhibit greater than or equal to 3mm recession at the facial surface midpoint. ii. Teeth must be visually stain and calculus free. iii. Teeth having a gingival index score less than or equal to 2. iv. Teeth with a clinical mobility of less than or equal to 1. v. Teeth that show signs of sensitivity, evaporative (air) sensitive teeth displaying a response of greater than or equal to 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). c) A minimum of three eligible teeth identified at the screening visit that continue to show signs of sensitivity at the baseline assessment at treatment visit 1, evaporative (air) sensitive teeth displaying a response of greater than or equal to 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy/Intolerance: Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the stent materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
- Condition of the Dentition: a) Sensitive teeth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter (OTC) dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator. b) Teeth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns, orthodontic bands, extensive caries or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentine.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (1)
University Park Research Center (UPRC)
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2011
First Posted
April 30, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 28, 2015
Results First Posted
April 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2013-03