The Effect of Fact Versus Myth Messages on Receipt of Influenza Vaccination
2 other identifiers
interventional
125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether message design of educational materials increases vaccination rates among participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 18, 2012
CompletedOctober 30, 2023
October 1, 2023
7 months
November 6, 2009
April 25, 2012
October 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Influenza Vaccination
The primary outcome is receipt of influenza vaccination at appointment directly following the post-test. A pre-test was completed by participants during a telephone interview that occurred approximately two weeks prior to a scheduled clinic appointment. The post-test was completed via an in-person interview by participants immediately prior to their scheduled appointment. That is, the participants met with the Research Assistant, completed the post-test, and then proceeded to see their physician for a previously scheduled office visit.
1 week following randomization
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Recall Accuracy
1 week following receipt of message
Study Arms (4)
Fact Only
EXPERIMENTALThe educational message used will contain facts only.
Fact and Myth
EXPERIMENTALThe educational material seen by this arm will contain facts and myths only.
Fact, Myth, Why
EXPERIMENTALThe educational material seen by this arm will contain myths, facts, and refutations of the myths.
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis arm will receive fact/myth educational materials originally developed and used by the CDC.
Interventions
Participants randomized to this intervention will receive an educational brochure listing the facts of the influenza vaccine.
Participants randomized to this intervention will receive an educational brochure listing the facts and myths of the influenza vaccine.
Participants randomized to this intervention will receive an educational brochure listing the facts, myths, and refutation of the myths of the influenza vaccine.
Participants randomized to this intervention will receive an educational brochure created and used by the CDC in a previous influenza season.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant must have a scheduled appointment at least 6 weeks in advance in either the GIM or Geriatrics clinics at NMFF.
- Participant must be a patient of Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation.
- Participant does not intend to receive the influenza vaccine.
You may not qualify if:
- Participant has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia
- Participant has received an influenza vaccination during either the last influenza season or the current.
- The scheduled visit is the participant's first time being seen by this doctor (appointment is to establish care in the clinic).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwestern Universitylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation General Internal Medicine and Geriatric Clinics
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Low participation in the trial due to the emergence of H1N1; many individuals \>50 years of age opted to receive seasonal flu vaccine as they were initially unable to receive the H1N1 vaccine. Hence, the available study population shrank markedly.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kenzie Cameron, PhD, MPH
- Organization
- Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2009
First Posted
November 9, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 30, 2023
Results First Posted
September 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2023-10