Study Stopped
The manufacturer decided to stop drug production.
Extended-release Epidural Morphine for Acute Post-operative Analgesia Following Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy in Children
Randomized, Double-Blinded Placebo Controlled Trial of Epidural, Sustained-relief Morphine for Acute Post-operative Analgesia Following Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this proposal is to improve the investigators' current Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) analgesia protocol by eliminating or minimizing the use of fentanyl in the post-operative period. Children undergoing SDR for spastic cerebral palsy have significant post-operative pain. The procedure requires dissection of the lumbar back musculature and removal of the L1 lamina (the bony posterior part of the vertebra). The majority of the operation is intradural, and a water-tight dural closure at the termination of the operation is critical in order to prevent leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the wound. In fact, these children must remain flat on their back for 48 hours to allow the dural incision to heal prior to mobilization. Thus, adequate pain control is essential not only for patient comfort, but also to prevent agitation and additional stress on the dural closure. Currently, the investigators' patients undergoing SDR are treated for 48 hours with scheduled intravenous (IV) narcotic (continuous fentanyl infusion at 0.5-2.0 μg/kg/hour) in addition to the sedative/muscle relaxant Valium (0.2 mg/kg IV every 4 hours for 24 hours, then every 6 hours for 24 hours). The IV fentanyl, and to a lesser degree Valium, carries a real risk of hypotension and respiratory depression and requires frequent dose adjustments to achieve adequate analgesia. By improving the current SDR analgesia protocol, the investigators hope to maximize patient safety and comfort while maintaining the effectiveness of the operation by minimizing the risk of CSF leak.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 13, 2018
CompletedJuly 11, 2018
June 1, 2018
4.8 years
August 3, 2009
April 2, 2018
June 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Adequacy of Analgesia as Judged by Age-adjusted Pain Scales
Mean and standard deviation for standardized, age-appropriate pain scales (per patient per day) 48hrs post surgery. As is standard of care at St. Louis Children's Hospital, pain level was scored based on age using the "Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability" (FLACC) for participants aged 0-3, the FACES scale on participants between the age of 3 and 5, numeric pain rating scale (NRS) on participants between the age of 5 and 8 years, or the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS) for participants greater than or equal to 8 years of age. All four of the scales were ranged from 0-10 scores, with 0 being no pain at all, and 10 being extreme pain. Each patient had two scores given, one at 24hrs and one at 48hrs post surgery. The output was reported as an average of all scores for all patients within each group.
48 hour post-operative period
Quantity of Fentanyl Administered
Mean and standard deviation of total quantity of fentanyl administered (per patient per day) 48hrs post surgery.
48 hour post-operative period
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of Participants With Respiratory Depression Within 48hrs Post op
48 hour post-operative period
Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Instability 48hrs Post op
48 hour post-operative period
Number of Participants With CSF Leaks Within 6 Months Post op.
6 month post-operative period
Number of Participants That Had Urine Retention for 48hrs Post Foley Catheter Removal.
After the Foley catheter has been removed on post-operative day #1 for a 48 hour follow-up period
Number of Participants With Nausea and/or Vomiting 48hrs Post op.
48 hour post-operative period
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
DepoDur80
EXPERIMENTALDepoDur will be administered at 80μg/kg (not to exceed 5 mg total/patient) under direct vision in the L1 laminectomy defect prior to wound closure.
DepoDur120
EXPERIMENTALDepoDur will be administered at 120μg/kg (not to exceed 10 mg total/patient) under direct vision in the L1 laminectomy defect prior to wound closure.
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORPreservative-free normal saline (2.5ml) will be placed in the L1 laminectomy defect and also dispensed 1-2 levels above and 1-2 levels below using a flexible angiocatheter prior to wound closure.
Interventions
After completion of the rhizotomy, the dura will be closed in the standard water-tight fashion with running suture. Epidural DepoDur (80μg/kg) will be placed under direct vision in the L1 laminectomy defect. It will also be dispensed 1-2 levels above and 1-2 levels below using a flexible angiocatheter.
After completion of the rhizotomy, the dura will be closed in the standard water-tight fashion with running suture. Epidural DepoDur (120μg/kg) will be placed under direct vision in the L1 laminectomy defect. It will also be dispensed 1-2 levels above and 1-2 levels below using a flexible angiocatheter.
After completion of the rhizotomy, the dura will be closed in the standard water-tight fashion with running suture. Preservative-free normal saline (2.5 ml) will be placed under direct vision in the L1 laminectomy defect. It will also be dispensed 1-2 levels above and 1-2 levels below using a flexible angiocatheter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Receiving selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR)
- Willingness to Participate
You may not qualify if:
- Known Morphine Allergy
- Inability to speak and read the English language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Related Publications (22)
Clark SL, Hankins GD. Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy--fact and fiction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;188(3):628-33. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.204.
PMID: 12634632BACKGROUNDKuban KC, Leviton A. Cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jan 20;330(3):188-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199401203300308. No abstract available.
PMID: 8264743BACKGROUNDGrether JK, Cummins SK, Nelson KB. The California Cerebral Palsy Project. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1992 Jul;6(3):339-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1992.tb00774.x.
PMID: 1635884BACKGROUNDTaft LT. Cerebral palsy. Pediatr Rev. 1995 Nov;16(11):411-8; quiz 418. No abstract available.
PMID: 8539191BACKGROUNDSteinbok P. Outcomes after selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2001 Jan;17(1-2):1-18. doi: 10.1007/pl00013722.
PMID: 11219613BACKGROUNDMcLaughlin J, Bjornson K, Temkin N, Steinbok P, Wright V, Reiner A, Roberts T, Drake J, O'Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Barber J, Ferrel A. Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Jan;44(1):17-25. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201001608.
PMID: 11811645BACKGROUNDWright FV, Sheil EM, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S. Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled tria. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998 Apr;40(4):239-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb15456.x.
PMID: 9593495BACKGROUNDSteinbok P, Reiner AM, Beauchamp R, Armstrong RW, Cochrane DD, Kestle J. A randomized clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Mar;39(3):178-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07407.x.
PMID: 9112967BACKGROUNDMcLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Graubert C, Hays RM, Roberts TS, Price R, Temkin N. Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomized clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998 Apr;40(4):220-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb15454.x.
PMID: 9593493BACKGROUNDChicoine MR, Park TS, Kaufman BA. Selective dorsal rhizotomy and rates of orthopedic surgery in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jan;86(1):34-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0034.
PMID: 8988079BACKGROUNDPark TS, Johnston JM. Surgical techniques of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Aug 15;21(2):e7.
PMID: 16918228BACKGROUNDHartrick CT, Hartrick KA. Extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur): review and safety analysis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 Nov;8(11):1641-8. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.11.1641.
PMID: 18986234BACKGROUNDGambling D, Hughes T, Martin G, Horton W, Manvelian G; Single-Dose EREM Study Group. A comparison of Depodur, a novel, single-dose extended-release epidural morphine, with standard epidural morphine for pain relief after lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005 Apr;100(4):1065-1074. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000145009.03574.78.
PMID: 15781524BACKGROUNDCarvalho B, Riley E, Cohen SE, Gambling D, Palmer C, Huffnagle HJ, Polley L, Muir H, Segal S, Lihou C, Manvelian G; DepoDur Study Group. Single-dose, sustained-release epidural morphine in the management of postoperative pain after elective cesarean delivery: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2005 Apr;100(4):1150-1158. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000149544.58230.FF.
PMID: 15781537BACKGROUNDCarvalho B, Roland LM, Chu LF, Campitelli VA 3rd, Riley ET. Single-dose, extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) compared to conventional epidural morphine for post-cesarean pain. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):176-83. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265533.13477.26.
PMID: 17578973BACKGROUNDViscusi ER, Martin G, Hartrick CT, Singla N, Manvelian G; EREM Study Group. Forty-eight hours of postoperative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty with a novel, extended-release epidural morphine formulation. Anesthesiology. 2005 May;102(5):1014-22. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200505000-00022.
PMID: 15851890BACKGROUNDHartrick CT, Martin G, Kantor G, Koncelik J, Manvelian G. Evaluation of a single-dose, extended-release epidural morphine formulation for pain after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):273-81. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02738.
PMID: 16452737BACKGROUNDMartin G, Hartmannsgruber M, Riley E, Manvelian G. Single-dose extended-release epidural morphine for pain after hip arthroplasty. J Opioid Manag. 2006 Jul-Aug;2(4):209-18. doi: 10.5055/jom.2006.0033.
PMID: 17319482BACKGROUNDMerkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997 May-Jun;23(3):293-7.
PMID: 9220806BACKGROUNDWong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):9-17. No abstract available.
PMID: 3344163BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Correlates of improvement in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Feb;62(1):172-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.1.172.
PMID: 8034820BACKGROUNDSolodiuk J, Curley MA. Pain assessment in nonverbal children with severe cognitive impairments: the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS). J Pediatr Nurs. 2003 Aug;18(4):295-9. doi: 10.1016/s0882-5963(03)00090-3.
PMID: 12923744BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was stopped short as the manufacturer decided to stop drug production; therefore without a complete enrollment, statistical analysis was not performed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Diego Morales
- Organization
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Limbrick, M.D., Ph.D.
Washington University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2009
First Posted
August 10, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 11, 2018
Results First Posted
June 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06