Robotic Rehabilitation of Cerebral Palsy
Home- and Lab-Based Passive and Active Movement Rehabilitation of Ankle Impairments in Children With Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to examine the outcomes of home-based robot-guided therapy and compare it to laboratory-based robot-guided therapy for impaired ankles in cerebral palsy. Children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) are randomly placed into two groups, participating in robot-guided stretching and active movement training either in a research lab setting (Lab group) or in a home setting (Home group).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2023
CompletedApril 13, 2023
April 1, 2023
3.7 years
January 26, 2015
April 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of Active Range of Motion (AROM)
The subjects will be asked to use their muscles to move the ankle joint and record the range of motion by the robot.
AROM will be assessed at 3 time points: at the beginning and the end of 6-week training, and follow-up at 6 weeks after the training ends.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Changes of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
MAS will be assessed at 3 time points: at the beginning and the end of 6-week training, and follow-up at 6 weeks after the training ends.
Changes of Selective Control Assessment of Lower Extremity (SCALE)
SCALE will be assessed at 3 time points: at the beginning and the end of 6-week training, and follow-up at 6 weeks after the training ends.
Changes of Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS)
PBS will be assessed at 3 time points: at the beginning and the end of 6-week training, and follow-up at 6 weeks after the training ends.
Changes of the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
TUG will be assessed at 3 time points: at the beginning and the end of 6-week training, and follow-up at 6 weeks after the training ends.
Changes of 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
6MWT will be assessed at 3 time points: at the beginning and the end of 6-week training, and follow-up at 6 weeks after the training ends.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lab group
EXPERIMENTALLab-based intervention includes 18 training sessions using the IntelliStretch in the lab .
Home group
EXPERIMENTALHome-based intervention includes 18 training sessions using the IntelliStretch at home.
Interventions
The impaired ankle of the participants are trained 3 times a week for 6 weeks in the lab or at home. The participants use the portable robotic device to stretch the ankle and increase range of motion (ROM). Then subjects use their gained ROM immediately in the active movement training to play video games and improve motor control.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spastic cerebral palsy with diplegia or hemiplegia (affected both legs or one leg)
- years old
- Can follow instructions and express any discomfort during the sessions.
You may not qualify if:
- Orthopedic surgery, serial casting, or injection of muscle relaxants such as botulinum toxin type A within 6 months prior to participation in the study
- Severe ankle contracture, greater than 20° plantar flexion
- Other unrelated neurological impairments or musculoskeletal injuries
- Can not sit for 1 hour
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Related Publications (15)
Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Olree KS, Park TS. Ankle spasticity and strength in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000 Jan;42(1):42-7. doi: 10.1017/s0012162200000086.
PMID: 10665974BACKGROUNDKrebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998 Mar;6(1):75-87. doi: 10.1109/86.662623.
PMID: 9535526BACKGROUNDDamiano DL, Alter KE, Chambers H. New clinical and research trends in lower extremity management for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2009 Aug;20(3):469-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.04.005.
PMID: 19643348BACKGROUNDNovak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, Campbell L, Dark L, Morton N, Stumbles E, Wilson SA, Goldsmith S. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Oct;55(10):885-910. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12246. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
PMID: 23962350BACKGROUNDZhang M, Davies TC, Xie S. Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation--a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Mar 21;10:30. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-30.
PMID: 23517734BACKGROUNDSelles RW, Li X, Lin F, Chung SG, Roth EJ, Zhang LQ. Feedback-controlled and programmed stretching of the ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors in stroke: effects of a 4-week intervention program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12):2330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.305.
PMID: 16344031BACKGROUNDWu YN, Hwang M, Ren Y, Gaebler-Spira D, Zhang LQ. Combined passive stretching and active movement rehabilitation of lower-limb impairments in children with cerebral palsy using a portable robot. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 May;25(4):378-85. doi: 10.1177/1545968310388666. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
PMID: 21343525BACKGROUNDWillerslev-Olsen M, Andersen JB, Sinkjaer T, Nielsen JB. Sensory feedback to ankle plantar flexors is not exaggerated during gait in spastic hemiplegic children with cerebral palsy. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;111(4):746-54. doi: 10.1152/jn.00372.2013. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
PMID: 24225545BACKGROUNDGeiger R, Strasak A, Treml B, Gasser K, Kleinsasser A, Fischer V, Geiger H, Loeckinger A, Stein JI. Six-minute walk test in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2007 Apr;150(4):395-9, 399.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.12.052.
PMID: 17382117BACKGROUNDBallaz L, Plamondon S, Lemay M. Ankle range of motion is key to gait efficiency in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Nov;25(9):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
PMID: 20655641BACKGROUNDGao F, Ren Y, Roth EJ, Harvey R, Zhang LQ. Effects of repeated ankle stretching on calf muscle-tendon and ankle biomechanical properties in stroke survivors. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 Jun;26(5):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
PMID: 21211873BACKGROUNDMankodi A, Azzabou N, Bulea T, Reyngoudt H, Shimellis H, Ren Y, Kim E, Fischbeck KH, Carlier PG. Skeletal muscle water T2 as a biomarker of disease status and exercise effects in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2017 Aug;27(8):705-714. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
PMID: 28601553BACKGROUNDSukal-Moulton T, Clancy T, Zhang LQ, Gaebler-Spira D. Clinical application of a robotic ankle training program for cerebral palsy compared to the research laboratory application: does it translate to practice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 2.
PMID: 24792141BACKGROUNDChiu HC, Ada L, Bania TA. Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD013114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013114.pub2.
PMID: 33202482DERIVEDChen K, Wu YN, Ren Y, Liu L, Gaebler-Spira D, Tankard K, Lee J, Song W, Wang M, Zhang LQ. Home-Based Versus Laboratory-Based Robotic Ankle Training for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Randomized Comparative Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Aug;97(8):1237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.029. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
PMID: 26903143DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Li-Qun Zhang, Ph.D.
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2015
First Posted
February 10, 2015
Study Start
June 21, 2019
Primary Completion
February 28, 2023
Study Completion
February 28, 2023
Last Updated
April 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share