Effects of Low Frequency Magnet Therapy on Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy
Placebo Controlled, Randomized, Double Blind, Clinical Trial of the Effects of Low Frequency Magnet Therapy on Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy
1 other identifier
interventional
48
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: Spasticity is a major challenge in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). It may cause unwanted complications and may affect the patient's quality of life. Currently there is no satisfactory long lasting control of spasticity. Many lines of evidence indicate that magnet therapy may be a useful intervention in the management of spasticity. Several studies showed that magnet may inhibit neuronal firing in the human nervous system; however, its effects weren't studied on spasticity. Objectives: The goal of the present study was to determine the short-and long-term effects of pulsed low frequency magnetic field therapy on spasticity in patient with CP. Methods: 48 patients with CP, who have measureable level of spasticity, were selected. The sample was divided randomly into active magnet group (received magnet therapy, 32 subjects) and placebo group (16 subjects). At the end of the 4th week the magnet group was divided into two sub-groups: 1st sub-group received magnet therapy for another 4 weeks while the other received the placebo. Measurements was taken at baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. Modified Ashworth Scale was used to measure spasticity, foot pressure platform system was used to measure the contact area and the maximum force of the feet, gross motor function measure (GMFM) was used to measure the functional level of the patients. The cerebral palsy quality of life (CP-QoL) questionnaire was used to measure the patients' various dimensions of quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2022
CompletedFebruary 16, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.2 years
January 8, 2022
February 7, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (22)
Change from baseline Modified Ashowreth Scale at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
measure the muscle resistance following a passive stretch - grades from (0 - 4), lower score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Gross Motor Function Scale at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
to evaluate the children with CP according to their motor functional ability - Scores (0% - 100%) where higher grade means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Feet Contact Area at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
The weight distribution between the feet and the ground - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Feet Maximum Force at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Measuring Feet Maximum Force of the participants - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Social well-being and acceptance dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (1,3,4,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Functioning dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (8,22,23,24,27,29,34,35,37,38,39,40). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Participation and physical health dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (9,16,17,18,19,20,21,25,26,30,37). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Emotional well-being dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (2,28,31,32,33,52). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Access to services dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (41, 42, 43, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Pain and impact of disability dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where (1= not bothered at all) to (9 = very bothered). 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means worse outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Family health dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (62, 63, 64, 65). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Modified Ashowreth Scale scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
measure the muscle resistance following a passive stretch - grades from (0 - 4), lower score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Gross Motor Function Scale scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
to evaluate the children with CP according to their motor functional ability - Scores (0% - 100%) where higher grade means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Feet Contact Area scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
The weight distribution between the feet and the ground - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Feet Maximum Force scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Measuring Feet Maximum Force of the participants - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Social well-being and acceptance dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (1,3,4,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Functioning dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (8,22,23,24,27,29,34,35,37,38,39,40). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Participation and physical health dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (9,16,17,18,19,20,21,25,26,30,37). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Emotional well-being dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (2,28,31,32,33,52). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Access to services dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (41, 42, 43, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Pain and impact of disability dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where (1= not bothered at all) to (9 = very bothered). 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means worse outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Family health dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (62, 63, 64, 65). 2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy. 3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score. 4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Study Arms (3)
12 sessions of magnet
EXPERIMENTAL24 sessions of magnet
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo magnet intervention
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A confirmed diagnosis of diplegic or quadriplegic CP of both genders,
- Able to stand without assistance.
- Age from 4-16 years
- Measureable spasticity (1 or more according to the Modified Ashworth Scale).
You may not qualify if:
- Have recent organ transplants.
- Have heart pace maker.
- Have cardiac arrhythmia, tachy cardiac conditions or large aneurysm.
- Have heavy psychosis.
- Underwent any neuromuscular blockers of Spasticity.
- Underwent any surgery of tendon lengthening before or during the study.
- Have epileptic episodes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Sr. Physical Therapy Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2022
First Posted
February 16, 2022
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02