Enhancing Empathy in Medical Communication Through Perspective-Taking
1 other identifier
interventional
608
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Empathy is critical to clinician-patient communication and patient outcomes. Perspective-taking, an intervention demonstrated in other contexts to induce empathy, has never been studied in a medical context. As a first step in evaluating its potential clinical value, the studies described below assess perspective taking in a series of clinical skills examinations. These examinations are simulated clinical encounters: students encounter and are evaluated by standardized patients (SPs)--actors trained to take on patient roles. Though not real clinical encounters, clinical skills examinations have been demonstrated to test clinical competency well enough to be incorporated into the licensure examination of the National Board of Medical Examiners. Objective: To assess if perspective-taking improves the satisfaction of standardized patients in three clinical skills examinations. Hypothesis: Students receiving a perspective taking intervention will receive better standardized patient satisfaction scores than control students. Design and Setting: Three randomized, controlled studies. Studies 1 and 3: Junior medical students(N = 503), 6-station clinical skills examination. Study 2: physician assistant students (N = 105), 3-station clinical skills examination. Intervention: The intervention students received a perspective-taking instruction prior to their examination asking them to put themselves in their "patients" shoes and to imagine what they were thinking and feeling. The control students received standard pre-examination instructions. Simulated patients were blind to study condition. Main Outcome Measure: Simulated patient satisfaction scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2006
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2009
CompletedMarch 16, 2009
March 1, 2009
1.2 years
February 27, 2009
March 13, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
standardized patient satisfaction
Study Arms (2)
Perspective taking intervention
EXPERIMENTALStudents were given an instruction to take the perspectives of their standardized patients
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudents given standard instructions
Interventions
Students were asked to take the perspective of their standardized patients during clinical skills examinations
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All third year medical and first and second year physician assistant students, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
George Washington University School of Medicine
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Benjamin C Blatt, MD
George Washington University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2009
First Posted
March 16, 2009
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2007
Study Completion
August 1, 2007
Last Updated
March 16, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-03