NCT03791697

Brief Summary

A randomized controlled trial that will evaluate whether telephone two-week postoperative follow up visits are an acceptable and safe alternative to traditional face-to-face-clinic two-week postoperative visits.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
142

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 9, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 3, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 3, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

December 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 2, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Postoperative patient satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Satisfaction (questionnaire)

    Comparison of patient satisfaction as determined by completion of a non-validated, treatment non-specific satisfaction questionnaire between the two groups.

    Survey will be provided at the six-week follow up visit.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient safety (adverse events)

    Postoperative period up to 6 weeks

  • Time Spent (post op telephone follow up compared to clinic follow up [minutes])

    Calculated from time spent at the two week follow up visit

Study Arms (2)

Telephone Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patient randomized into the telephone follow up group, will be contacted, at the pre-scheduled date and time, by the urogynecology clinic nurse. The nurse will utilize a scripted series of postoperative questions, which are consistent with questions asked during our standard postoperative clinic visits. Vital signs and physical examination will be deferred for the patients in the telephone follow up group. Any patient responses that are not consistent with a usual postoperative course will be escalated to an in person visit. However, these patients will remain in the group, to which they were originally randomized, for research analysis purposes.

Other: Telehealth 2 week postoperative visit

In Person Clinic Visit Group

NO INTERVENTION

For the patient randomized into the clinic group, the clinic visit will entail questions about common postoperative complications (including fever, nausea/vomiting, pain, urinary symptoms, constipation, etc.). As per usual, vital signs and a focused physical examination will be completed at the clinic visit. All clinic visits will be performed by an FPRMS fellow and/or attending physician

Interventions

The patient randomized into the telephone follow up group, will be contacted, at the pre-scheduled date and time, by the urogynecology clinic nurse. The nurse will utilize a scripted series of postoperative questions, which are consistent with questions asked during our standard postoperative clinic visits. Vital signs and physical examination will be deferred for the patients in the telephone follow up group. Any patient responses that are not consistent with a usual postoperative course will be escalated to an in person visit. However, these patients will remain in the group, to which they were originally randomized, for research analysis purposes. (Intent to treat)

Telephone Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women \>18 desiring surgical management of prolapse or incontinence
  • English speaking
  • Willing and able to provide written and informed consent without assistance from medical surrogate or interpreter
  • Immediate access to telephone services (landline, mobile phone, office phone)

You may not qualify if:

  • Women \<18
  • Non-English speaking
  • Unwilling and unable to provide written and informed consent without assistance from surrogate or interpreter
  • Hearing impairment
  • No access to telephone services (landline, mobile phone, office phone)
  • Grade 3 complication- a complication requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention. \[3\]
  • Patient who did not attend any postoperative follow up visit

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Florida Health

Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Interventions

Telemedicine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Delivery of Health CarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Elisha J Jackson, MD

    University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Elisha J Jackson, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Eligible patients will be randomized to Arm1 or Arm2 (Telephone follow up or clinic follow up). Permuted block randomization with randomly varying block sizes will be used. Generation of allocation sequences will be performed using a random-number table. The allocation sequence will be generated by our statistician who is neither responsible for patient recruitment or outcome assessment. Sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes will be used for concealment of treatment allocation. It is not possible to mask clinical staff or participants, as they will be aware of the follow-up care that is being delivered over the telephone or in clinic. As such this is not a blinded study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physician-Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2018

First Posted

January 3, 2019

Study Start

July 9, 2018

Primary Completion

July 1, 2019

Study Completion

July 31, 2019

Last Updated

January 3, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations