Telehealth Postop Follow up RCT
Preferred Method of Postoperative Follow Up After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery. (Phone Call Versus Clinic Visit): A Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
142
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized controlled trial that will evaluate whether telephone two-week postoperative follow up visits are an acceptable and safe alternative to traditional face-to-face-clinic two-week postoperative visits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 3, 2019
December 1, 2018
12 months
December 30, 2018
January 2, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction (questionnaire)
Comparison of patient satisfaction as determined by completion of a non-validated, treatment non-specific satisfaction questionnaire between the two groups.
Survey will be provided at the six-week follow up visit.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient safety (adverse events)
Postoperative period up to 6 weeks
Time Spent (post op telephone follow up compared to clinic follow up [minutes])
Calculated from time spent at the two week follow up visit
Study Arms (2)
Telephone Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient randomized into the telephone follow up group, will be contacted, at the pre-scheduled date and time, by the urogynecology clinic nurse. The nurse will utilize a scripted series of postoperative questions, which are consistent with questions asked during our standard postoperative clinic visits. Vital signs and physical examination will be deferred for the patients in the telephone follow up group. Any patient responses that are not consistent with a usual postoperative course will be escalated to an in person visit. However, these patients will remain in the group, to which they were originally randomized, for research analysis purposes.
In Person Clinic Visit Group
NO INTERVENTIONFor the patient randomized into the clinic group, the clinic visit will entail questions about common postoperative complications (including fever, nausea/vomiting, pain, urinary symptoms, constipation, etc.). As per usual, vital signs and a focused physical examination will be completed at the clinic visit. All clinic visits will be performed by an FPRMS fellow and/or attending physician
Interventions
The patient randomized into the telephone follow up group, will be contacted, at the pre-scheduled date and time, by the urogynecology clinic nurse. The nurse will utilize a scripted series of postoperative questions, which are consistent with questions asked during our standard postoperative clinic visits. Vital signs and physical examination will be deferred for the patients in the telephone follow up group. Any patient responses that are not consistent with a usual postoperative course will be escalated to an in person visit. However, these patients will remain in the group, to which they were originally randomized, for research analysis purposes. (Intent to treat)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women \>18 desiring surgical management of prolapse or incontinence
- English speaking
- Willing and able to provide written and informed consent without assistance from medical surrogate or interpreter
- Immediate access to telephone services (landline, mobile phone, office phone)
You may not qualify if:
- Women \<18
- Non-English speaking
- Unwilling and unable to provide written and informed consent without assistance from surrogate or interpreter
- Hearing impairment
- No access to telephone services (landline, mobile phone, office phone)
- Grade 3 complication- a complication requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention. \[3\]
- Patient who did not attend any postoperative follow up visit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jackson, Elishalead
- University of South Floridacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Florida Health
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisha J Jackson, MD
University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician-Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2018
First Posted
January 3, 2019
Study Start
July 9, 2018
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
January 3, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share