NCT05884684

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of spine physicians reviewing post-procedural fluoroscopic images with patients. The outcome measure to be assessed will be the potential impact the patient satisfaction and the patient's global impression of change (PGIC) 2 weeks after the spine procedure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
141

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 17, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 10, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

EpiduralSpine procedure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Modified Press Gainey Satisfaction (PGS) Questionnaire

    Patient satisfaction as measured by a modified version of the PGS Questionnaire. The questionnaire is comprised of 9 questions measuring general patient satisfaction with the care experience. Each question is on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The lowest possible score of the PGS is 9, and the highest possible score is 45. The lower the total score, the poorer the patient's satisfaction, while the higher the score, the higher the patient's satisfaction.

    Up to 2 hours following procedure in the post-op area

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    2 weeks following procedure

Study Arms (2)

Post-Procedural Images Not Discussed with Participants

NO INTERVENTION

During a lumbar epidural steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance, images are taken as part of the procedure. Following the procedure, the surgeon who performed it will not discuss the images with the participants in this arm. If participants request an explanation of the images, they will not be included in the analysis.

Post-Procedural Images Discussed with Participants

OTHER

During a lumbar epidural steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance, images are taken as part of the procedure. Following the procedure, the surgeon who performed it will discuss the images with the participants in this arm.

Other: Reviewing Imaging with Participant

Interventions

Post-operatively, the images taken during the procedure will be reviewed with the participant.

Post-Procedural Images Discussed with Participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Lumbosacral radiculopathy symptoms
  • Received transforaminal epidural steroid injection

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who will be sedated for transforaminal epidural steroid injection
  • Unable to read or understand English-language survey

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Michigan - Burlington Building

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Choudhury T, Jung J, Barnes M, Chandran S, Eckner JT, Geisser M, Kohns DJ. The impact on fluoroscopic image review on perceived benefit, patient satisfaction, and short-term improvement following lumbosacral epidural steroid injections. Interv Pain Med. 2025 Aug 31;4(3):100640. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100640. eCollection 2025 Sep.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • David Kohns, DO

    University of Michigan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: A spine physician will not discuss images with the first group of participants immediately following their procedure. A spine physician will discuss images with the second group of participants immediately following their procedure.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2023

First Posted

June 1, 2023

Study Start

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion

April 30, 2025

Study Completion

August 15, 2025

Last Updated

September 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations