Controlled Study of Farabloc for Chronic Phantom Limb Pain Among Veteran Amputees
A Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Farabloc for Chronic Phantom Limb Pain Among Veteran Amputees
3 other identifiers
interventional
57
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to determine if the group using Farabloc shows a greater reduction in pain levels than the group not using Farabloc at 6-week, 12-week and 1-month post treatment follow-ups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2011
CompletedMarch 14, 2012
March 1, 2012
3 years
November 24, 2008
March 12, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome will be pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
Measurements will be obtained at baseline, and 6-week and 12-week follow-ups
Secondary Outcomes (2)
A secondary outcome will measure health-related quality of life using the 36-item Sort Form Health Survey (SF-36).
The assessment will be conducted at pretest, 6-week, 12-week and 1-month post treatment.
Measurement of health care utilization will be conducted by comparing the numbers of outpatient visits emergency room visits and inpatient hospitalizations using the VA electronic medical system CPRS.
At 12-week pretreatment and 12-week follow-up.
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORWear prosthetics laminated with Farabloc surrounding the liner. If not wearing prosthetics, subject needs to wear Farabloc sock or glove over shrinker.
2
SHAM COMPARATORWear prosthetics laminated with sham material surrounding the liner. If not wearing prosthetics, subject needs to wear sock or glove over shrinker.
Interventions
Wear prosthetics, sock or glove laminated with Farabloc
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Upper or lower extremity amputees with healed stumps
- Experience episodes or intermittent PLP
- At least 3 episodes of PLP during the previous 6 weeks
- Have not used Farabloc within the last 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women are excluded from the study
- Stump complications (e.g., cellulites and stump pain caused by new bone spur within the past 12 months
- Previous use of Farabloc within 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Long Beach Healthcare System
Long Beach, California, 90822-5201, United States
Related Publications (25)
Adams PF, Hendershot GE, Marano MA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1996. Vital Health Stat 10. 1999 Oct;(200):1-203.
PMID: 15782448BACKGROUNDEphraim PL, Dillingham TR, Sector M, Pezzin LE, Mackenzie EJ. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;84(5):747-61. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04932-8.
PMID: 12736892BACKGROUNDPotter BK, Scoville CR. Amputation is not isolated: an overview of the US Army Amputee Patient Care Program and associated amputee injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(10 Spec No.):S188-90. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200600001-00041.
PMID: 17003197BACKGROUNDLin DL, Kirk KL, Murphy KP, McHale KA, Doukas WC. Evaluation of orthopaedic injuries in Operation Enduring Freedom. J Orthop Trauma. 2004 May-Jun;18(5):300-5. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200405000-00006.
PMID: 15105752BACKGROUNDIslinger RB, Kuklo TR, McHale KA. A review of orthopedic injuries in three recent U.S. military conflicts. Mil Med. 2000 Jun;165(6):463-5.
PMID: 10870364BACKGROUNDKorver AJ. Amputees in a hospital of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Injury. 1993 Oct;24(9):607-9. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90124-o.
PMID: 8288381BACKGROUNDSherman RA. Phantom limb pain. Mechanism-based management. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994 Jan;11(1):85-106.
PMID: 8124659BACKGROUNDEphraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ, Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;86(10):1910-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.031.
PMID: 16213230BACKGROUNDKooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Elzinga A, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. 2000 Jul;87(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00264-5.
PMID: 10863043BACKGROUNDDijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Stewart R, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and risk factors: a multivariate analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Dec;24(6):578-85. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00538-9.
PMID: 12551807BACKGROUNDRichardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, Horgan M. Incidence of phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin J Pain. 2006 May;22(4):353-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000177793.01415.bd.
PMID: 16691088BACKGROUNDWhyte A, Niven CA. The illusive phantom: does primary care meet patient need following limb loss? Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jul 22-Aug 5;26(14-15):894-900. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001708904.
PMID: 15497918BACKGROUNDSherman RA, Sherman CJ, Parker L. Chronic phantom and stump pain among American veterans: results of a survey. Pain. 1984 Jan;18(1):83-95. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90128-3.
PMID: 6709380BACKGROUNDWartan SW, Hamann W, Wedley JR, McColl I. Phantom pain and sensation among British veteran amputees. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Jun;78(6):652-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.6.652.
PMID: 9215014BACKGROUNDAmir R, Devor M. Ongoing activity in neuroma afferents bearing retrograde sprouts. Brain Res. 1993 Dec 10;630(1-2):283-8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90667-c.
PMID: 8118694BACKGROUNDJain N, Florence SL, Kaas JH. Reorganization of Somatosensory Cortex After Nerve and Spinal Cord Injury. News Physiol Sci. 1998 Jun;13:143-149. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.1998.13.3.143.
PMID: 11390778BACKGROUNDFlor H, Elbert T, Muhlnickel W, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Taub E. Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Mar;119(2):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s002210050334.
PMID: 9535570BACKGROUNDChabal C, Jacobson L, Russell LC, Burchiel KJ. Pain responses to perineuromal injection of normal saline, gallamine, and lidocaine in humans. Pain. 1989 Mar;36(3):321-325. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90091-2.
PMID: 2710561BACKGROUNDParkes CM. Factors determining the persistence of phantom pain in the amputee. J Psychosom Res. 1973 Mar;17(2):97-108. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(73)90010-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 4741689BACKGROUNDShukla GD, Sahu SC, Tripathi RP, Gupta DK. Phantom limb: a phenomenological study. Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;141:54-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.141.1.54.
PMID: 7116073BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):387-392. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90133-3.
PMID: 7838588BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999 Nov;83(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00101-3.
PMID: 10534586BACKGROUNDMcHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.
PMID: 8277801BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PMID: 1593914BACKGROUNDKazis LE, Ren XS, Lee A, Skinner K, Rogers W, Clark J, Miller DR. Health status in VA patients: results from the Veterans Health Study. Am J Med Qual. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):28-38. doi: 10.1177/106286069901400105.
PMID: 10446661BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
An-Fu Hsiao, M.D., Ph.D.
VA Long Beach Healthcare System
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2008
First Posted
November 25, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 14, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03