NCT00707980

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of vortioxetine, once daily (QD), in adults with major depressive disorder.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
836

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2008

Typical duration for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder

Geographic Reach
17 countries

92 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2008

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 27, 2008

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2008

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2010

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 13, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 13, 2013

Status Verified

October 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

June 27, 2008

Results QC Date

October 24, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 24, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Major Depressive DisorderDepressionMelancholiaMood DisorderDysthymic DisorderDrug Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Physical Examination Findings

    Physical examination consisted of the following body systems: (1) appearance; (2) extremities; (3) skin; (4) head and neck; (5) eyes, ears, nose, and throat; (6) lungs and chest; (7) heart and cardiovascular system; (8) abdomen; and (9) musculoskeletal system. An assessment of the nervous system was conducted; any findings were captured under the appropriate body area. Each system was assessed as normal or abnormal.

    Baseline and Week 52

  • Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Evaluation Findings

    Participants with at least one post-baseline potentially clinically significant (as defined in the table below) serum chemistry, hematology or urinalysis result. ULN = upper limit of normal; LLN = Lower limit of normal.

    Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44 and 52

  • Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    A standard 12-lead ECG was performed at the designated study visits. The central reader reviewed and recorded the intervals (PR, QRS, RR, QT, and corrected QT interval \[QTc\]), and interpreted the ECG using 1 of the following categories: within normal limits or abnormal. The number of participants with at least one post-baseline potentially clinically significant ECG finding is reported. bpm = beats per minute; QTcB = QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula; QTcF = QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula.

    Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    The intensity (severity) of each AE was defined as: * Mild: caused minimal discomfort and did not interfere in a significant manner with normal activities. * Moderate: sufficiently uncomfortable to produce some impairment of normal activities. * Severe: incapacitating, preventing the patient from participating in normal activities. The causal relationship between an AE and study drug was assessed by the investigator as Probable, Possible or Not Related; Related=AEs with causality of Possibly or Probably. A serious AE (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, led to a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event that either jeopardized the patient, required intervention to prevent any of the SAEs defined above, a suicide attempt or an abortion.

    From the first dose of open-label study drug until 4 weeks after the last dose (up to 56 weeks)

  • Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Findings

    Participants with at least one potentially clinically significant post-baseline vital sign finding. The definition of clinically significant is included in the table below for each parameter. SSBP = supine systolic blood pressure; SDBP = supine diastolic blood pressure.

    Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 44 and 52

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Scale-24 Item (HAM-D24) Total Score

    Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 44 and 52.

  • Change From Baseline in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score

    Baseline and Weeks 4, 24 and 52

  • Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score

    Baseline and Weeks 4, 24 and 52

  • Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness Scale

    Baseline and Weeks 4, 24 and 52

  • Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in 36-item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36)

    Baseline and Week 52

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Vortioxetine

EXPERIMENTAL

Vortioxetine 2.5 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up to 52 weeks. For the first week of treatment all participants received 5 mg/day vortioxetine, thereafter, the dose could be increased to 10 mg/day or decreased to 2.5 mg/day, based on participant's response and tolerability as judged by the investigator.

Drug: Vortioxetine

Interventions

Encapsulated vortioxetine immediate-release tablets

Also known as: Lu AA21004, Brintellix®
Vortioxetine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 76 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Has completed the double blind treatment period of either study Lu AA21004\_304 (NCT00672620) or LuAA21004\_305 (NCT00735709) immediately prior to enrollment in the extension study (ie, the baseline visit is the same visit as the completion visit of the double blind treatment of the preceding protocol).
  • Suffers from a major depressive episode as the primary diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria (classification code 296.xx) at entry into the prior Lu AA21004\_304 or Lu AA21004\_305 study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Has Major Depressive Disorder for whom other psychiatric disorders (mania, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or any psychotic disorder) have been diagnosed during the prior study.
  • The participant, in the investigator's opinion, has a significant risk of suicide and/or a score of ≥5 points on item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
  • The participant, in the opinion of the investigator, is unlikely to comply with the clinical study protocol or is unsuitable for any reason.
  • Has a clinically significant moderate or severe ongoing adverse event related to study medication from the prior study.
  • Has used/uses disallowed concomitant medication.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (92)

Unknown Facility

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Irvine, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Ana, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Torrance, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Upland, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Coral Springs, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Walton Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Maitland, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orlando, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

South Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Smyrna, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Libertyville, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oak Brook, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Prairie Village, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Flowood, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Olean, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Allenport, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Seattle, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Elizabeth Vale, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Richmond, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Southport, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Osijek, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Zagreb, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bully-les-Mines, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Marseille, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Strasbourg, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bochum, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Chemnitz, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hüttenberg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

München, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Nuremberg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Wiesbaden, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Liepāja, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Riga, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Sigulda, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Šiauliai, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Vilnius, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

SchHoogfliet, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Wildervank, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Zwijndrecht, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Leszno, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Pruszków, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Skórzewo, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Tuszyn, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Moscow, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Novosibirsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Omsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Stavropol, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tomsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Belgrade, Serbia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bryanston, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Durban, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Lyttelton, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Noordheuwel, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Pretoria, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Buchon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Incheon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Dnipro, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kiev, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Luhansk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Simferopol, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Glasgow, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, MajorDepressionDepressive DisorderMood DisordersDysthymic Disorder

Interventions

Vortioxetine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PiperazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Director, Clinical Science
Organization
Takeda

Study Officials

  • Medical Director, Clinical Science

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2008

First Posted

July 2, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 13, 2013

Results First Posted

December 13, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-10

Locations