Safety and Tolerability of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder
A Long-Term, Open-Label, Flexible-Dose, Extension Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Lu AA21004 in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder
3 other identifiers
interventional
836
17 countries
92
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of vortioxetine, once daily (QD), in adults with major depressive disorder.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
Started Jun 2008
Typical duration for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
92 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 13, 2013
CompletedDecember 13, 2013
October 1, 2013
2.1 years
June 27, 2008
October 24, 2013
October 24, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Physical Examination Findings
Physical examination consisted of the following body systems: (1) appearance; (2) extremities; (3) skin; (4) head and neck; (5) eyes, ears, nose, and throat; (6) lungs and chest; (7) heart and cardiovascular system; (8) abdomen; and (9) musculoskeletal system. An assessment of the nervous system was conducted; any findings were captured under the appropriate body area. Each system was assessed as normal or abnormal.
Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Evaluation Findings
Participants with at least one post-baseline potentially clinically significant (as defined in the table below) serum chemistry, hematology or urinalysis result. ULN = upper limit of normal; LLN = Lower limit of normal.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44 and 52
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
A standard 12-lead ECG was performed at the designated study visits. The central reader reviewed and recorded the intervals (PR, QRS, RR, QT, and corrected QT interval \[QTc\]), and interpreted the ECG using 1 of the following categories: within normal limits or abnormal. The number of participants with at least one post-baseline potentially clinically significant ECG finding is reported. bpm = beats per minute; QTcB = QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula; QTcF = QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula.
Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
The intensity (severity) of each AE was defined as: * Mild: caused minimal discomfort and did not interfere in a significant manner with normal activities. * Moderate: sufficiently uncomfortable to produce some impairment of normal activities. * Severe: incapacitating, preventing the patient from participating in normal activities. The causal relationship between an AE and study drug was assessed by the investigator as Probable, Possible or Not Related; Related=AEs with causality of Possibly or Probably. A serious AE (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, led to a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event that either jeopardized the patient, required intervention to prevent any of the SAEs defined above, a suicide attempt or an abortion.
From the first dose of open-label study drug until 4 weeks after the last dose (up to 56 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Sign Findings
Participants with at least one potentially clinically significant post-baseline vital sign finding. The definition of clinically significant is included in the table below for each parameter. SSBP = supine systolic blood pressure; SDBP = supine diastolic blood pressure.
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 44 and 52
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Scale-24 Item (HAM-D24) Total Score
Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 44 and 52.
Change From Baseline in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Baseline and Weeks 4, 24 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score
Baseline and Weeks 4, 24 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness Scale
Baseline and Weeks 4, 24 and 52
Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in 36-item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36)
Baseline and Week 52
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Vortioxetine
EXPERIMENTALVortioxetine 2.5 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up to 52 weeks. For the first week of treatment all participants received 5 mg/day vortioxetine, thereafter, the dose could be increased to 10 mg/day or decreased to 2.5 mg/day, based on participant's response and tolerability as judged by the investigator.
Interventions
Encapsulated vortioxetine immediate-release tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has completed the double blind treatment period of either study Lu AA21004\_304 (NCT00672620) or LuAA21004\_305 (NCT00735709) immediately prior to enrollment in the extension study (ie, the baseline visit is the same visit as the completion visit of the double blind treatment of the preceding protocol).
- Suffers from a major depressive episode as the primary diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria (classification code 296.xx) at entry into the prior Lu AA21004\_304 or Lu AA21004\_305 study.
You may not qualify if:
- Has Major Depressive Disorder for whom other psychiatric disorders (mania, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or any psychotic disorder) have been diagnosed during the prior study.
- The participant, in the investigator's opinion, has a significant risk of suicide and/or a score of ≥5 points on item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
- The participant, in the opinion of the investigator, is unlikely to comply with the clinical study protocol or is unsuitable for any reason.
- Has a clinically significant moderate or severe ongoing adverse event related to study medication from the prior study.
- Has used/uses disallowed concomitant medication.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
- H. Lundbeck A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (92)
Unknown Facility
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Irvine, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Ana, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Torrance, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Upland, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Springs, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Walton Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Maitland, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
South Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Smyrna, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Libertyville, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Oak Brook, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Prairie Village, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Owensboro, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Flowood, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Olean, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Beachwood, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Allenport, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Elizabeth Vale, Australia
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Australia
Unknown Facility
Southport, Australia
Unknown Facility
Osijek, Croatia
Unknown Facility
Zagreb, Croatia
Unknown Facility
Bully-les-Mines, France
Unknown Facility
Marseille, France
Unknown Facility
Strasbourg, France
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bochum, Germany
Unknown Facility
Chemnitz, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hüttenberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Leipzig, Germany
Unknown Facility
München, Germany
Unknown Facility
Nuremberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Wiesbaden, Germany
Unknown Facility
Liepāja, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Sigulda, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Šiauliai, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
SchHoogfliet, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Wildervank, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Zwijndrecht, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Leszno, Poland
Unknown Facility
Pruszków, Poland
Unknown Facility
Skórzewo, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, Poland
Unknown Facility
Tuszyn, Poland
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Unknown Facility
Novosibirsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Omsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Stavropol, Russia
Unknown Facility
Tomsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Belgrade, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Bryanston, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Durban, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Lyttelton, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Noordheuwel, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Buchon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Incheon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Dnipro, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Luhansk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Simferopol, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director, Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director, Clinical Science
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2008
First Posted
July 2, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 13, 2013
Results First Posted
December 13, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10