Randomised Placebo-controlled Duloxetine-referenced Efficacy and Safety Study of 2.5, 5 and 10 mg of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Duloxetine-referenced, Fixed-dose Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Three Dosages of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004, in Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
2 other identifiers
interventional
766
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of three fixed doses of Vortioxetine in order to establish the appropriate clinical effective dose range in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
Started Feb 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 11, 2014
CompletedFebruary 11, 2014
December 1, 2013
1.2 years
March 3, 2008
October 28, 2013
December 23, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment
The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe.
Baseline and Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change From Baseline in HAM-D-24 Total Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment
Baseline and Week 8
Proportion of Responders at Week 8 (Response Defined as a >=50% Decrease in the MADRS Total Score From Baseline)
Week 8
Change in Clinical Status Using CGI-I Score at Week 8
Week 8
Change From Baseline in HAM-D-24 Total Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Baseline HAM-A Total Score >=20
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline in SDS Total Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment
Baseline and Week 8
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORVortioxetine: 2.5 mg
EXPERIMENTALVortioxetine: 5 mg
EXPERIMENTALVortioxetine: 10 mg
EXPERIMENTALDuloxetine: 60 mg
OTHERActive reference
Interventions
2.5 mg/day; encapsulated tablets; orally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- MDE as primary diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR criteria (classification code 296.xx)
- Moderate to severe depression
- Current MDE duration of at least 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Any current psychiatric disorder other than MDD as defined in the DSM-IV TR
- Any substance disorder within the previous 6 months
- Female patients of childbearing potential who are not using effective contraception
- Use of any psychoactive medication 2 weeks prior to screening and during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/Slead
Related Publications (5)
Baldwin DS, Loft H, Dragheim M. A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study of three dosages of Lu AA21004 in acute treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Jul;22(7):482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
PMID: 22209361RESULTBelzeaux R, Gorgievski V, Fiori LM, Lopez JP, Grenier J, Lin R, Nagy C, Ibrahim EC, Gascon E, Courtet P, Richard-Devantoy S, Berlim M, Chachamovich E, Theroux JF, Dumas S, Giros B, Rotzinger S, Soares CN, Foster JA, Mechawar N, Tall GG, Tzavara ET, Kennedy SH, Turecki G. GPR56/ADGRG1 is associated with response to antidepressant treatment. Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 2;11(1):1635. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15423-5.
PMID: 32242018DERIVEDChristensen MC, Florea I, Loft H, McIntyre RS. Efficacy of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder reporting childhood or recent trauma. J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.074. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
PMID: 31818787DERIVEDBelzeaux R, Fiori LM, Lopez JP, Boucekine M, Boyer L, Blier P, Farzan F, Frey BN, Giacobbe P, Lam RW, Leri F, MacQueen GM, Milev R, Muller DJ, Parikh SV, Rotzinger S, Soares CN, Uher R, Foster JA, Kennedy SH, Turecki G. Predicting Worsening Suicidal Ideation With Clinical Features and Peripheral Expression of Messenger RNA and MicroRNA During Antidepressant Treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 May 7;80(3):18m12556. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12556.
PMID: 31087825DERIVEDMcIntyre RS, Florea I, Tonnoir B, Loft H, Lam RW, Christensen MC. Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):115-121. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10744.
PMID: 27780334DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Organization
- H. Lundbeck A/S
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S
LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2008
First Posted
March 13, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 11, 2014
Results First Posted
February 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-12