NCT00678535

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that addition of cetuximab to 1st-line treatment with capecitabine (Xeloda, X) and cisplatin (P) \[XP\] chemotherapy regimen has a clinically relevant benefit for subjects with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma including gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, in terms of progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives are to assess cetuximab plus XP versus XP alone with respect to overall survival, overall tumor response, quality of life (QoL) and safety.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
904

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 gastric-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2008

Geographic Reach
24 countries

127 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 13, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2008

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2008

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2012

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 16, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

July 21, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

May 13, 2008

Results QC Date

March 30, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

1st line treatment for Gastric CancerCetuximabCapecitabineXelodaCisplatinProgression-free survival

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time: Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

    The PFS time is defined as the duration from randomization to either first observation of progressive disease (PD) or occurrence of death due to any cause within 60 days of the last tumor assessment or randomization. Participants without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment.

    Time from randomization to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Overall Survival (OS)

    Time from randomization to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012)

  • Best Overall Response (BOR) Rate: Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

    Every 6 weeks until progression, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date, (31 Mar 2012)

  • Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)

  • Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by EuroQol 5Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire

    Baseline, Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 60, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)

  • Safety - Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time from first dose up to Day 30 after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first participant randomized, that is, 30 Jun 2008 until cut-off date (31 Mar 2012)

Study Arms (2)

Cetuximab plus Capecitabine plus Cisplatin

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: CetuximabDrug: CapecitabineDrug: Cisplatin

Capecitabine plus Cisplatin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: CapecitabineDrug: Cisplatin

Interventions

Single first dose of cetuximab 400 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) will be administered intravenously over 120 minutes followed by weekly intravenous infusion of cetuximab 250 mg/m\^2 over 60 minutes in each 3-week treatment cycle, until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Also known as: Erbitux
Cetuximab plus Capecitabine plus Cisplatin

Capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 will be administered orally twice daily from evening of Day 1 to morning of Day 15 for every 3-week treatment cycle, until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Also known as: Xeloda
Capecitabine plus CisplatinCetuximab plus Capecitabine plus Cisplatin

Cisplatin 80 mg/m\^2 will be administered intravenously with infusion over 1 to 4 hours on Day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle, until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Capecitabine plus CisplatinCetuximab plus Capecitabine plus Cisplatin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent before any study-related activities are carried out
  • Age greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years
  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction \[AEG\] Types I-III according to Siewert classification)
  • Archived tumor material sample for at least subsequent standardized Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) expression assessment
  • Unresectable advanced (M0) or unresectable metastatic (M1) disease
  • At least one radiographically documented measurable lesion in a previously non-irradiated area according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). The primary tumor site is to be considered as a non-measurable lesion only
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
  • Estimated life expectancy greater than (\>) 12 weeks
  • Medically accepted contraception (if the risk of conception exists)
  • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \>= 60 milliliter per minute (mL/min) The GFR is based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance
  • Aspartate-aminotransferase (ASAT) less than or equal to (=\<) 2.5 \* upper limit of normal (ULN) and alanine-aminotransferase (ALAT) =\< 2.5 \*ULN
  • Bilirubin =\< 3 \* ULN
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1.5 \* 10\^9 per liter
  • Platelets \>= 100 \* 10\^9 per liter
  • Hemoglobin \>=10 gram per deciliter (g/dL) (without transfusions)
  • +1 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior chemotherapy, however, previous (neo-)adjuvant (radio-) chemotherapy allowed if finished \> 1 year prior to start of study treatment and no more than 300 mg/m\^2 cisplatin has been administered
  • Prior treatment with an antibody or molecule targeting EGFR and/or Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) related signaling pathways
  • Brain metastasis and/or leptomeningeal disease (known or suspected)
  • Radiotherapy (except localized radiotherapy for pain relief), major surgery or any investigational drug within 30 days before the start of study treatment
  • Concurrent chronic systemic immune or hormone therapy not indicated in this study protocol (except for physiologic replacement)
  • Clinically relevant coronary artery disease (New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] functional angina classification III/IV), congestive heart failure (NYHA III/IV), clinically relevant cardiomyopathy, history of myocardial infarction in the 12 months before study Screening, or high risk of uncontrolled arrhythmia
  • Active Hepatitis B or C
  • Chronic diarrhea or short bowel syndrome
  • Presence of any contra-indication to treatment with cetuximab, capecitabine and cisplatin including:
  • Known hypersensitivity to capecitabine, fluorouracil, cisplatin, cetuximab or to any of the excipients of these drugs
  • Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency
  • Hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Current treatment with sorivudine or chemically related analogues, such as brivudine
  • Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Grade \>= 2 and/or ototoxicity NCI CTCAE Grade \>= 2, except if due to trauma or mechanical impairment due to tumor mass
  • Pregnancy or lactation period
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (130)

Research site

Rosario, Argentina

Location

Research site

Coburg VIC, Australia

Location

Research site

Frankston, VIC, Australia

Location

Research site

Perth, Australia

Location

Research site

Graz, Austria

Location

Research site

Kufstein, Austria

Location

Research site

Steyr, Austria

Location

Research Site

Vienna, Austria

Location

Research Site

Zams, Austria

Location

Research Site

Bonheiden, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Research site

Verviers, Belgium

Location

Research site

Campinas, Brazil

Location

Research site

Ijuí, Brazil

Location

Research site

Jaú, Brazil

Location

Research site

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Location

Research site

Salvador, Brazil

Location

Research site

Santo André, Brazil

Location

Research site

Sâo Paulo, Brazil

Location

Research site

Pleven, Bulgaria

Location

Research site

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Location

Research site

Rousse, Bulgaria

Location

Research site

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Research site

Reñaca, Chile

Location

Research site

Santiago, Chile

Location

Research site

Temuco, Chile

Location

Research site

Valparaíso, Chile

Location

Research site

Beijing, China

Location

Research site

Guangzhou, China

Location

Research site

Hefei, China

Location

Research site

Nanjing, China

Location

Research site

Shanghai, China

Location

Research site

Shenyang, China

Location

Research Site

Brno, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Hradec Králové, Czechia

Location

Research site

Prague, Czechia

Location

Research site

Besançon, France

Location

Research site

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Location

Research site

La Roche-sur-Yon, France

Location

Research site

Marseille, France

Location

Research site

Paris, France

Location

Research site

Rennes, France

Location

Research Site

Berlin, Germany

Location

Research site

Bielefeld, Germany

Location

Research site

Braunschweig, Germany

Location

Research site

Cologne, Germany

Location

Research Site

Dresden, Germany

Location

Research Site

Essen, Germany

Location

Research site

Esslingen am Neckar, Germany

Location

Research site

Frankfurt, Germany

Location

Research Site

Giessen, Germany

Location

Research Site

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Research Site

Heidelberg, Germany

Location

Research site

Ludwigshafen, Germany

Location

Research Site

Mainz, Germany

Location

Research Site

München, Germany

Location

Research site

Offenbach, Germany

Location

Research Site

Regensburg, Germany

Location

Research Site

Schwäbisch Hall, Germany

Location

Research site

Schweinfurt, Germany

Location

Research site

Stuttgart, Germany

Location

Research Site

Timisoara, Germany

Location

Research Site

Troisdorf, Germany

Location

Research site

Ulm, Germany

Location

Research site

Weiden, Germany

Location

Research Site

Weilheim, Germany

Location

Research site

Ioannina, Greece

Location

Research site

Thessaloniki, Greece

Location

Research site

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Research site

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Research site

Győr, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Kaposvár, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Tatabánya, Hungary

Location

Research site

Haifa, Israel

Location

Research site

Jerusalem, Israel

Location

Research site

Petach Tiqva, Israel

Location

Research site

Ramat Gan, Israel

Location

Research site

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

Research site

Ancona, Italy

Location

Research site

Bologna, Italy

Location

Research site

Milan, Italy

Location

Research site

Napoli, Italy

Location

Research site

Roma, Italy

Location

Research site

Rozzano (Milano), Italy

Location

Research site

Chiba, Japan

Location

Research site

Ehime, Japan

Location

Research site

Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Research site

Kōtoku, Japan

Location

Research site

Nagoya, Japan

Location

Research site

Osaka, Japan

Location

Research site

Saitama, Japan

Location

Research site

Shizuoka, Japan

Location

Research site

Tochigi, Japan

Location

Research site

Tokyo, Japan

Location

Research site

Yokohama, Japan

Location

Research site

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Research site

Lublin, Poland

Location

Research site

Opole, Poland

Location

Research site

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Research site

Sana Maria Da Feira, Portugal

Location

Research site

Baia Mare, Romania

Location

Research Site

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Location

Research Site

Iași, Romania

Location

Research site

Timișoara, Romania

Location

Research site

Kazan', Russia

Location

Research site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research site

Obninsk, Russia

Location

Research site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research site

Anyang, South Korea

Location

Research site

Daegu, South Korea

Location

Research site

Inchon-si, South Korea

Location

Research site

Seongnam, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Alicante, Spain

Location

Research site

El Palmar-Murcia, Spain

Location

Research site

Lugo, Spain

Location

Research site

Pamplona, Spain

Location

Research Site

Santander, Spain

Location

Research site

Seville, Spain

Location

Research Site

Valencia, Spain

Location

Research site

Changhua, Taiwan

Location

Research site

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Research site

Kaohsiung County, Taiwan

Location

Research site

Taichung, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Tainan, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research site

Taoyuan District, Taiwan

Location

Research site

Guildford, United Kingdom

Location

Research site

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomach Neoplasms

Interventions

CetuximabCapecitabineCisplatin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesStomach Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsDeoxycytidineCytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsFluorouracilUracilPyrimidinonesDeoxyribonucleosidesNucleosidesNucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and NucleosidesChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsNitrogen CompoundsPlatinum Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Merck KGaA Communication Center
Organization
Merck Serono, a division of Merck KGaA

Study Officials

  • Florian Lordick, MD, PhD

    University Clinic Leipzig, University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig Germany

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2008

First Posted

May 15, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion

March 1, 2012

Study Completion

February 1, 2013

Last Updated

July 21, 2014

Results First Posted

May 16, 2013

Record last verified: 2014-07

Locations