NCT00676338

Brief Summary

This study will compare the effects of 2.0 mg exenatide once weekly injection as monotherapy to 3 active comparators(metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and thiazolidinedione) in drug naive patients with type 2 diabetes treated with diet and exercise.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
820

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2008

Typical duration for phase_3 type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Geographic Reach
22 countries

106 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2008

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2008

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2010

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2011

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 26, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 9, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2008

Results QC Date

February 14, 2012

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

AmylinLillyexenatide once weeklyByettaJanuviasitagliptinthiazolidinedione

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

    Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26.

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26

    Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c \<=7% at Week 26 (for patients with baseline HbA1c \>7%).

    Baseline, Week 26

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Change in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline

    Baseline, Week 26

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Exenatide Once Weekly

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: exenatide once weekly

Metformin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: metformin

Sitagliptin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: sitagliptin

Pioglitazone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: pioglitazone

Interventions

subcutaneous injection, 2mg, once weekly plus placebo oral once daily

Exenatide Once Weekly

oral, 1000-2500mg, daily plus placebo once weekly subcutaneous injection

Metformin

oral, 100 mg, daily plus placebo once weekly subcutaneous injection

Sitagliptin

oral, 30-45mg, daily plus placebo once weekly subcutaneous injection

Pioglitazone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • have type 2 diabetes and are treated with diet and exercise alone.
  • at least 18 years of age.
  • HbA1c between 7.1% and 11.0%, inclusive.
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 23 kg/m2 to 45 kg/m2, inclusive.
  • Have a history of stable body weight (not varying by \>5% for at least 3 months prior to screening).

You may not qualify if:

  • Have a history of renal transplantation or are currently receiving renal dialysis
  • Have active or untreated malignancy, or have been in remission from clinically significant malignancy (other than basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ carcinomas of the cervix, or in situ prostate cancer) for less than 5 years.
  • Have history of severe GI disorder (e.g., gastroparesis)
  • Have a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis.
  • Have active proliferative retinopathy.
  • Have been treated with drugs that promote weight loss (e.g., Xenical®\[orlistat\], Meridia® \[sibutramine\], Acomplia® \[rimonabant\], Acutrim® \[phenylpropanolamine\], or similar over-the-counter medications) within 3 months of screening.
  • Have been treated with any antidiabetic agent for more than 7 days within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Have had an organ transplant.
  • Have previously completed or discontinued study drug in this study, withdrawn from this study or any other study investigating exenatide once weekly.
  • Have received treatment within the last 30 days with a drug that has not received regulatory approval for any indication at the time of study entry.
  • Are currently enrolled in any other clinical study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (106)

Research Site

Buena Park, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Valencia, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Research Site

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Location

Research Site

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Location

Research Site

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Location

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Location

Research Site

Billings, Montana, United States

Location

Research Site

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Location

Research Site

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Location

Research Site

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Wilke Barre, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

El Paso, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

New Branufels, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Mar del Plata, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Leuven, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Marchovelette, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Tessenderlo, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Brasília, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Campinas, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Curitiba, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Fortaleza, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Joinville, Brazil

Location

Research SIte

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Recife, Brazil

Location

Research Site

São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Research Site

Penticton, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Research Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Location

Research Site

Gatineu, Quebec, Canada

Location

Research Site

Mississauga, Canada

Location

Research Site

Petitcodiac, Canada

Location

Research Site

Pointe-Claire, Canada

Location

Research Site

Regina, Canada

Location

Research Site

Saint John, Canada

Location

Research Site

Châteaugiron, France

Location

Research Site

Mûrs-Erigné, France

Location

Research Site

Nantes, France

Location

Research Site

Vieux-Condé, France

Location

Research Site

Dresden, Germany

Location

Research Site

Mainz, Germany

Location

Research Site

Münster, Germany

Location

Research Site

Rodgau, Germany

Location

Research Site

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Gyula, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Pécs, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Ahmedabad, India

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, India

Location

Research Site

Channai, India

Location

Research Site

Kochi, India

Location

Research Site

Mumbai, India

Location

Research Site

New Dehli, India

Location

Research SIte

Pune, India

Location

Research Site

Holon, Israel

Location

Research SIte

Tel Litwinsky, Israel

Location

Research Site

Florence, Italy

Location

Research Site

Milan, Italy

Location

Research Site

Siena, Italy

Location

Research Site

Chihuahua City, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Guadalajara, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Monterrey, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Lublin, Poland

Location

Research Site

Szczecin, Poland

Location

Research Site

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Research Site

Manatí, Puerto Rico

Location

Research Site

Toa Baja, Puerto Rico

Location

Research Site

Galati, Romania

Location

Research Site

Oradea, Romania

Location

Research Site

Târgu Mureş, Romania

Location

Research Site

Arkhangelsk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research Site

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research Site

Stavropol, Russia

Location

Research Site

Bratislava, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Trebišov, Slovakia

Location

Research Site

Johannesburg, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Kempton Park, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Midrand, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Soweto, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Busan, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Daegu, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Jeonju, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Sungnam, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Alicante, Spain

Location

Research Site

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Research Site

Madrid, Spain

Location

Research Site

Seville, Spain

Location

Research Site

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Sisli-Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Bath, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Frome, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Guildford, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Hull, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Sheffield, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Swansea, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Guja C, Frias JP, Suchower L, Hardy E, Marr G, Sjostrom CD, Jabbour SA. Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Stage 2/3 Chronic Kidney Disease. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jul;11(7):1467-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00815-z. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

  • Malloy J, Meloni A, Han J. Efficacy and tolerability of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):58-67. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2661.

  • Grimm M, Han J, Weaver C, Griffin P, Schulteis CT, Dong H, Malloy J. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an integrated analysis of the DURATION trials. Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):47-57. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2660.

  • Meloni AR, DeYoung MB, Han J, Best JH, Grimm M. Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with exenatide once weekly versus oral glucose-lowering medications or insulin glargine: achievement of glycemic and cardiovascular goals. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Mar 23;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-48.

  • Russell-Jones D, Cuddihy RM, Hanefeld M, Kumar A, Gonzalez JG, Chan M, Wolka AM, Boardman MK; DURATION-4 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study. Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):252-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1107. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

MetforminSitagliptin PhosphatePioglitazone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BiguanidesGuanidinesAmidinesOrganic ChemicalsTriazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPyrazinesThiazolidinedionesThiazolesSulfur Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Peter Ohman, Medical Science Director
Organization
AstraZeneca

Study Officials

  • Chief Medical Officer, MD

    Eli Lilly and Company

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2008

First Posted

May 13, 2008

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion

July 1, 2010

Study Completion

January 1, 2011

Last Updated

April 9, 2015

Results First Posted

November 26, 2012

Record last verified: 2015-03

Locations