NCT00641056

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of 2.0 mg exenatide once weekly and insulin glargine, titrated to glucose targets using the algorithm described by Yki- Järvinen et al.(2007), with respect to glycemic improvements, body weight, fasting lipids, safety, and tolerability.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
467

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 type-2-diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2008

Geographic Reach
16 countries

75 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 17, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 21, 2008

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2008

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2009

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2009

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 4, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

June 15, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

March 17, 2008

Results QC Date

February 14, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

diabetesexenatideexenatide once weeklymetforminsulfonylureainsulin glargineAmylinLilly

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

    Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7.0% at Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Change in Body Weight (BW) From Baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26

    Baseline, Week 26

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Exenatide Once Weekly

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Insulin Glargine

Interventions

subcutaneous injection, 2.0mcg, once weekly

1

subcutaneous injection, variable dose, QD

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Has type 2 diabetes and at least 18 years of age at screening.
  • Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.1% to 11.0%, inclusive, at screening.
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 to 45 kg/m2, inclusive, at screening.
  • Have a history of stable body weight (not varying by \>5% for at least 3 months prior to screening).
  • Have been treated with metformin(Met) for at least 3 months and have been taking a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to screening OR
  • Have been treated with metformin(Met) for at least 3 months and have been taking a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and have been treated with SU for at least 3 months and have been taking a stable dose of at least an optimally effective dose of brand of SU for 8 weeks prior to screening.

You may not qualify if:

  • Have clinical signs or symptoms of liver disease, acute or chronic hepatitis.
  • Have a history of renal transplantation or are currently receiving renal dialysis.
  • Have active or untreated malignancy, or have been in remission from clinically significant malignancy (other than basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ carcinomas of the cervix, or in situ prostate cancer) for less than 5 years.
  • Have had greater than three episodes of major hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Have any contraindication for the oral antidiabetic agent which they use.
  • Have a known allergy or hypersensitivity to insulin glargine, exenatide once weekly, or excipients contained in these agents.
  • Are known to have active proliferative retinopathy.
  • Have been treated with drugs that promote weight loss (e.g., Xenical® \[orlistat\], Meridia® \[sibutramine\], Acomplia® \[rimonabant\], Acutrim® \[phenylpropanolamine\], or similar over-the-counter medications) within 3 months of screening.
  • Have been treated for longer than 2 weeks with any of the following excluded medications within 3 months prior to screening:
  • Insulin
  • Thiazolidinediones (e.g., Actos® \[pioglitazone\] or Avandia® \[rosiglitazone\])
  • Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (e.g., Glyset® \[miglitol\] or Precose® \[acarbose\])
  • Meglitinides (e.g., Prandin® \[repaglinide\] or Starlix® \[nateglinide\]).
  • Byetta® (exenatide BID formulation)
  • Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors (e.g., Januvia™ \[sitagliptin\], Galvus® \[vildagliptin\])
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (75)

Research Site

Escondido, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Location

Research Site

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Location

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Location

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Research Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Location

Research Site

Ada, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Location

Research Site

Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Location

Research Site

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Location

Research Site

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Location

Research Site

Keswick, South Australia, Australia

Location

Research Site

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Location

Research Site

Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Location

Research Site

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Edegem, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Mělník, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Prague, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Stodůlky, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Aalborg, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Arhus C, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Herlev, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Køge, Denmark

Location

Research Site

Angers, France

Location

Research Site

Corbeil Essoness, France

Location

Research Site

Nancy, France

Location

Research Site

Nanterre, France

Location

Research Site

Toulouse, France

Location

Research Site

Bad Mergentheim, Germany

Location

Research Site

Dresden, Germany

Location

Research Site

Essen, Germany

Location

Research Site

Falkensee, Germany

Location

Research Site

Fulda, Germany

Location

Research Site

Münster, Germany

Location

Research Site

Othmarschen, Germany

Location

Research Site

Rothenburg An Der Fulda, Germany

Location

Research Site

Speyer, Germany

Location

Research Site

Athens, Greece

Location

Research Site

Thessaloniki, Greece

Location

Research Site

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Eger, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Gyula, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Pécs, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Mérida, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Tampico, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Tijuana, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Gouda, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Hoogeveen, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Zwijndrecht, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Zwolle, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Caguas, Puerto Rico

Location

Research Site

Yabucoa, Puerto Rico

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research Site

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research Site

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Alicante, Spain

Location

Research Site

Alzira-Valencia, Spain

Location

Research Site

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Research Site

Bilbao, Spain

Location

Research Site

Madrid, Spain

Location

Research Site

Málaga, Spain

Location

Research Site

Teruel, Spain

Location

Research Site

Chiayi City, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Tainan County, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taoyuan District, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Diamant M, Van Gaal L, Stranks S, Guerci B, MacConell L, Haber H, Scism-Bacon J, Trautmann M. Safety and efficacy of once-weekly exenatide compared with insulin glargine titrated to target in patients with type 2 diabetes over 84 weeks. Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):683-9. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1233. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

  • Guja C, Frias JP, Suchower L, Hardy E, Marr G, Sjostrom CD, Jabbour SA. Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Stage 2/3 Chronic Kidney Disease. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jul;11(7):1467-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00815-z. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

  • Diamant M, Van Gaal L, Guerci B, Stranks S, Han J, Malloy J, Boardman MK, Trautmann ME. Exenatide once weekly versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes (DURATION-3): 3-year results of an open-label randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Jun;2(6):464-73. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70029-4. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

  • Grimm M, Han J, Weaver C, Griffin P, Schulteis CT, Dong H, Malloy J. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an integrated analysis of the DURATION trials. Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):47-57. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2660.

  • Meloni AR, DeYoung MB, Han J, Best JH, Grimm M. Treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with exenatide once weekly versus oral glucose-lowering medications or insulin glargine: achievement of glycemic and cardiovascular goals. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Mar 23;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-48.

  • Fineman MS, Mace KF, Diamant M, Darsow T, Cirincione BB, Booker Porter TK, Kinninger LA, Trautmann ME. Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jun;14(6):546-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

  • Diamant M, Van Gaal L, Stranks S, Northrup J, Cao D, Taylor K, Trautmann M. Once weekly exenatide compared with insulin glargine titrated to target in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-3): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Jun 26;375(9733):2234-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60406-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetes Mellitus

Interventions

Insulin Glargine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Insulin, Long-ActingInsulinsPancreatic HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Peter Ohman, Medical Science Director
Organization
AstraZeneca

Study Officials

  • Chief Medical Officer, MD

    Eli Lilly and Company

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2008

First Posted

March 21, 2008

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion

May 1, 2009

Study Completion

November 1, 2009

Last Updated

June 15, 2015

Results First Posted

July 4, 2012

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations