An Open, Randomised, Parallel Group Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Flutiform® pMDI vs Fluticasone pMDI Plus Formoterol DPI in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Mild to Moderate-severe Persistent, Reversible Asthma
Open, Randomised, Parallel Group Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy & Safety of Flutiform® pMDI vs Fluticasone pMDI Plus Formoterol DPI in Adolescent & Adult Subjects With Mild to Moderate-severe Persistent, Reversible Asthma
2 other identifiers
interventional
227
6 countries
6
Brief Summary
Flutiform® compared with the individual components Flixotide® (Fluticasone) and Foradil® (Formoterol) in adolescent and adult patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2008
CompletedOctober 24, 2018
October 1, 2018
7 months
November 21, 2007
October 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of mean Forced Expriatory Volume in the 1st second (FEV1) values.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Discontinuation, PEFR, rescue medication use, asthma symptom scores, sleep disturbance, AQLQ, exacerbations, patient acceptance
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Flutiform
EXPERIMENTAL2 puffs 50/5 or 125/5 mcg
Flixotide plus Foradil
ACTIVE COMPARATORFlixotide 2 puffs 50 or 125 mcg; Foradil 1 puff 12 mcg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects at least 12 years or older (females less than one year post-menopausal must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test recorded at the screening visit prior to the first dose of study medication, be non-lactating, and willing to use adequate and highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study if they are sexually active. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly such as sterilization, implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs (Intrauterine Device, hormonal), sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner).
- Known history of mild to moderate-severe persistent, reversible asthma for ≥ 6 months prior to the screening visit.
- Demonstrate a FEV1 of ≥40% to ≤85% for predicted normal values (Quanjer et al, 19931) during the screening phase following appropriate withholding of asthma medications (if applicable).
- No β2-agonist use on day of screening.
- No use of inhaled combination asthma therapy on day of screening.
- Inhaled corticosteroids are allowed on day of screening.
- Documented reversibility of ≥15% in FEV1 in the screening phase.
- Demonstrate satisfactory technique in the use of the study medications.
- Willing and able to enter information in the diary and attend all study visits.
- Willing and able to substitute study medication for their pre study prescribed asthma medication for the duration of the study.
- Written informed consent obtained
You may not qualify if:
- Near fatal or life-threatening (including intubation) asthma within the past year.
- Hospitalization or an emergency visit for asthma within the past year.
- History of systemic (oral or parenteral) corticosteroid medication within 1 month before the Screening Visit.
- History of omalizumab use within the past 6 months.
- History of leukotriene receptor antagonist use, e.g. montelukast, or theophylline within the past week.
- Current evidence or history of any clinically significant disease or abnormality including uncontrolled coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or cardiac dysrhythmia. 'Clinically significant' is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the patient at risk through study participation, or which would affect the outcome of the study.
- In the investigators opinion a clinically significant upper or lower respiratory infection within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
- Significant, non-reversible, active pulmonary disease (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, tuberculosis).
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive status.
- A smoking history equivalent to "10 pack years" (i.e., at least 1 pack of 20 cigarettes /day for 10 years or 10 packs/day for 1 year, etc.).
- Current smoking history within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Current evidence or history of alcohol and/or substance abuse within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Subjects who have taken B-blocking agents, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, astemizole (Hismanal), quinidine type antiarrhythmics, or potent CYP 3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole within the past week.
- Current use of medications that will have an effect on bronchospasm and/or pulmonary function.
- Current evidence or history of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to test medications or components.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Research Site
Kassel, Germany
Research Site
Érd, Hungary
Research site
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Research Site
Krakow, Poland
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Research Site
Chesterfield, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Bodzenta-Lukaszyk A, van Noord J, Schroder-Babo W, McAulay K, McIver T. Efficacy and safety profile of fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy compared to its individual components administered concurrently in asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 May;29(5):579-88. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.772506. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
PMID: 23368897DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2007
First Posted
November 26, 2007
Study Start
September 1, 2007
Primary Completion
April 1, 2008
Study Completion
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 24, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10