Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of FlutiForm® pMDI 125/5 µg (2 Puffs Bid) Versus Symbicort® Turbohaler® 200/6 µg (2 Puffs Bid) in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Persistent, Reversible Asthma
2 other identifiers
interventional
261
5 countries
5
Brief Summary
A comparator study to assess safety and efficacy of Flutiform® compared with symbicort turbohaler in asthma patients with moderate to severe persistent, reversible asthma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 asthma
Started Apr 2010
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedOctober 24, 2018
October 1, 2018
7 months
April 6, 2010
October 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
non-inferiority in the efficacy of FlutiForm®
To show non-inferiority in the efficacy of FlutiForm® pMDI 125/5 µg (2 puffs bid) vs Symbicort® Turbohaler® 200/6 µg (2 puffs bid), based on the mean change in the pre morning dose value of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) from baseline (end of run-in period) to the end of the 12 week treatment period.
baseline to the end of the 12 week treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Additional efficacy and safety assessments
Study Arms (2)
Inhaler
ACTIVE COMPARATORinhaler
ACTIVE COMPARATORSymbicort
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects at least 12 years old
- Female subjects less than 1 year post-menopausal must have a negative urine pregnancy test recorded at the screening visit prior to the first dose of study medication, be non-lactating, \& willing to use adequate \& highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently \& correctly such as sterilisation, implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs (Intrauterine Device, hormonal), sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner.
- Known history of moderate to severe persistent, reversible asthma for ≥ 6 months prior to the Screening Visit characterised by:
- Treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) at a dose of 250 - 1000 µg fluticasone or equivalent OR Treatment wth ICS at a dose of 200-500 µg fluticasone or equivalent in combination with a Long Acting β2-Agonist (LABA).
- Demonstrated a FEV1 of ≥ 50% to ≤ 80% for predicted normal values (Quanjer et al., 1993 (adults), \& 1995 (adolescents)) during the Screening Period (Visit 1 or Visit 2) following appropriate withholding of asthma medications (if applicable).
- No β2-agonist use on day of testing
- No use of inhaled combination asthma therapy on day of testing.
- Inhaled corticosteroids are allowed on day of testing.
- Documented reversibility of ≥ 15% in FEV1 at visit 1 or visit 2.
- Demonstrated satisfactory technique in the use of the study medications i.e. pMDI and Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) devices.
- Willing \& able to enter information in the electronic diary \& attend all study visits.
- Willing \& able to substitute study medication for their pre study prescribed asthma medication for the duration of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Near fatal or life-threatening (including intubation) asthma within the past year.
- Hospitalisation or an emergency visit for asthma within the 4 weeks before the Screening Visit.
- Known history of systemic (injectable or oral) corticosteroid medication use within 1 month of the Screening Visit.
- Known history of omalizumab use within the past 6 months.
- Current evidence or known history of any clinically significant disease or abnormality including uncontrolled coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or cardiac dysrhythmia. 'Clinically significant' is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the subject at risk through study participation, or which would affect the outcome of the study.
- In the investigator's opinion a clinically significant upper or lower respiratory infection within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
- Significant, non-reversible, active pulmonary disease (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, tuberculosis).
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive status.
- Subject has a smoking history equivalent to "10 pack years" (i.e., at least 1 pack of 20 cigarettes/day for 10 years or 10 packs/day for 1 year, etc.).
- Current smoking history within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Current evidence or known history of alcohol and/or substance abuse within 12 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Subject has taken B-blocking agents, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, astemizole (Hismanal), quinidine type antiarrhythmics, or potent CYP 3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole within the past week.
- Current use of medications other than those allowed in the protocol that will have an effect on bronchospasm \&/or pulmonary function.
- Current evidence or known history of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to test medications or components.
- Subject has received an investigational drug within 30 days of the Screening Visit (12 weeks if an oral or injectable steroid).
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Csongrád Megyei Önkormányzat Mellkasi Betegségek Szakkórháza Tüdőgondozó Intézet
Szeged, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Indore, India
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Brasov, Romania
Related Publications (1)
Oba Y, Anwer S, Maduke T, Patel T, Dias S. Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):CD013799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013799.pub2.
PMID: 36472162DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2010
First Posted
April 7, 2010
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 24, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10