Comparison of Flutiform, Fluticasone and Seretide in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Asthma in Paediatric Patients
A Double-blind, Double Dummy, Randomised, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Flutiform pMDI With Fluticasone pMDI and With Seretide pMDI in Paediatric Subjects Aged 5 to Less Than 12 Years With Moderate to Severe Persistent Reversible Asthma
2 other identifiers
interventional
498
8 countries
8
Brief Summary
This is a comparator study to assess safety and efficacy of Flutiform compared with Fluticasone pMDI and Seretide pMDI in paediatric asthma patients with moderate to severe persistent, reversible asthma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 asthma
Started Mar 2012
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2013
CompletedOctober 24, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.5 years
December 7, 2011
October 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To show superiority in the efficacy of Flutiform pMDI 50/5μg (2 puffs bid) versus fluticasone pMDI 50 μg (2 puffs bid).
Change from pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) in litres at baseline to 2 hours post-dose FEV1 at the end of the 12 week treatment period.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Show non-inferiority in the efficacy of Flutiform to Seretide
12 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Flutiform
ACTIVE COMPARATORSeretide
ACTIVE COMPARATORFlixotide
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and Female subjects 5 to \<12 years old.
- Known history of moderate to severe persistent reversible asthma1 for ≥ 6 months prior to the screening visit.
- Demonstrated FEV1 of ≥ 60% to ≤ 90% for predicted normal values (Polgar 1971) during the screening period following appropriate withholding of asthma medications (if applicable):
- No LABA use within 12 hours and/or no SABA use within 6 hours of the PFT
- No use of inhaled ICS-LABA asthma therapy within 12 hours of the PFT
- Inhaled corticosteroids are allowed on the day of screening
- Documented reversibility of ≥ 15% in FEV1 in the screening period
- Current use of an inhaled corticosteroid for asthma at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Inadequate asthma control on an ICS alone at a dose of ≤ 500 µg fluticasone equivalents/day, OR controlled asthma on an ICS-LABA combination at a ICS dose of ≤ 200 µg fluticasone equivalents/day
- Demonstrated satisfactory technique in the use of the pMDI and spacer device
- Can perform spirometry adequately
- Willing and able to enter information in the electronic diary with the help of a parent or guardian, if necessary and attend all study visits
- Willing and able to substitute pre-study prescribed inhaled asthma medication for the entire duration of the study
- If a female subject is post menarche a urine pregnancy test may be undertaken at the discretion of the investigator and the subjects' parent(s) /legal representative. This test must be negative.
- Written informed consent and assent obtained as per national law
You may not qualify if:
- Near fatal or life-threatening (including intubation) asthma within the past year
- Hospitalisation or an emergency visit for asthma within the past 6 months
- History of systemic (injectable or oral) corticosteroid medication within 1 month of the screening visit
- Current or prior non-response or partial response only to an ICS-LABA combination1
- Evidence of a clinically unstable disease, as determined by medical history, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examination that, in the Investigator's opinion, preclude entry into the study. "Clinically significant" is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the subject at risk through study participation, or which would affect the outcome of the study
- In the Investigator's opinion a clinically significant upper or lower respiratory infection within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Significant, non-reversible active pulmonary disease (e.g. cystic fibrosis, bronchiecstasis, tuberculosis)
- Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive status
- Current smoking history within 12 months prior to the screening visit
- Current evidence of alcohol or substance abuse within 12 months prior to the screening visit
- Subjects who have taken β- blocking agents, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, astemizole (Hismanal), quinidine type antiarrythmics, or potent CYP 3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole within 1 week prior to the screening visit
- Current use of medications, other than those allowed in the protocol, that in the investigator's opinion will have an effect on bronchospasm and/or pulmonary function
- Current evidence of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to test medications or components
- Receipt of an Investigational medicinal product within 30 days of the screening visit
- Current participation in a clinical study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Alergologie Skopkova s.r.o
Ostrava-Marianske Hory, Czechia
Illés és Ádám Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Bt.
Kiskunhalas, Hungary
Unknown Facility
New Dehli, India
Alergo-Med Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Sp.z.o.o.
Tarnów, Poland
Spitalul Judetean de Urgenta Deva
Deva, Hunedoara, Romania
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Odesa, Ukraine
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2011
First Posted
January 18, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
November 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 24, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10