Role of Apathy in the Effectiveness of Weight Loss Interventions
1 other identifier
interventional
101
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treating apathy with methylphenidate or medical Crisis counselling will increase adherence to weight loss programs thereby increasing their effectiveness
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable obesity
Started Aug 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 4, 2019
CompletedOctober 4, 2019
October 1, 2019
1.8 years
October 23, 2007
June 19, 2018
October 2, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Apathy Evaluation Scale
Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) measures apathy over the previous four weeks Scale range: 18 (minimum score)- 72 (Maximum score) Higher scores indicate higher apathy Better outcome would be reduction in the score
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Weight
6 months
Study Arms (5)
1
NO INTERVENTIONstandard nutrition counselling
2
EXPERIMENTALMOVE -weight loss intervention
3
EXPERIMENTALMOVE plus medical crisis counselling
4
EXPERIMENTALMOVE plus methylphenidate
5
EXPERIMENTALMOVE plus methyphenidate plus medical crisis counselling
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI \>30
- Apathy score \>40
You may not qualify if:
- History of cancer, except basal cell
- Cardiovascular event in last 6 months
- Renal failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Medical Center, Omaha
Omaha, Nebraska, 68105-1873, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cyrus Desouza
- Organization
- VANebraska
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cyrus DeSouza, MD
VA Medical Center, Omaha
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2007
First Posted
October 24, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 4, 2019
Results First Posted
October 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10