Phone Versus Clinical Approach to Weight Loss
Equivalent Weight Loss for Phone and Clinic Weight Management Programs
2 other identifiers
interventional
395
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Weight loss and maintenance continues to be problematic for individuals who are overweight or obese. State-of-the-art treatment generally involves a behavioral weight loss clinic that emphasizes nutrition, physical activity, and lifestyle changes and is delivered face-to-face between health educators and small groups of participants. This delivery system is time consuming, expensive, and presents numerous barriers to the participant. We have developed a phone based delivery system that eliminates many of these barriers by substituting group conference calls for clinics and by delivering weight loss materials and products directly to the participant. Hypothesis 1: We expect equivalent weight loss from baseline for phone and clinic groups and have defined equivalence as no greater than 4 kg difference between groups based on our pilot data and potential for clinical significance. Hypothesis 2: During weight maintenance it is likely that participants will experience some weight re-gain. We expect both phone and clinic groups to re-gain a similar amount of weight and that weight for both groups at 18 months will be significantly less than baseline weights. Hypothesis 3: We will complete a cost analysis to determine which delivery method is more economical. Specifically, we expect the phone delivery system to be more cost effective than that of the in-person clinics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Jul 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedApril 4, 2014
April 1, 2014
4 years
March 26, 2010
April 3, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Equivalent weight loss for phone and clinic groups.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Equal weight management/regain.
12 months
Cost Analysis
18 months
Study Arms (2)
Phone based weight management group
EXPERIMENTALGroup based weight management program delivered via conference calls
Clinic based weight management group
EXPERIMENTALTraditional clinical based group weight management program
Interventions
To determine if weight loss is equivalent between individuals that complete weight loss meetings in person versus on the phone.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years,
- BMI between 25 and 39.9,
- Clearance from PCP.
You may not qualify if:
- Research project within previous 6 months,
- Exercise \> 500 kcal/week,
- Pregnancy,
- Serious medical risk,
- Eating disorders,
- Use of special diets.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Energy Balance Lab, The University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, United States
Related Publications (2)
Donnelly JE, Goetz J, Gibson C, Sullivan DK, Lee R, Smith BK, Lambourne K, Mayo MS, Hunt S, Lee JH, Honas JJ, Washburn RA. Equivalent weight loss for weight management programs delivered by phone and clinic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Oct;21(10):1951-9. doi: 10.1002/oby.20334. Epub 2013 May 25.
PMID: 23408579RESULTLambourne K, Washburn RA, Gibson C, Sullivan DK, Goetz J, Lee R, Smith BK, Mayo MS, Donnelly JE. Weight management by phone conference call: a comparison with a traditional face-to-face clinic. Rationale and design for a randomized equivalence trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):1044-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
PMID: 22664647DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph E Donnelly, EdD
University of Kansas
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2010
First Posted
March 30, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 4, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04