NCT00509899

Brief Summary

To determine the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of ruxolitinib (INCB018424), administered orally to patients with Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) and Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
154

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2007

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2007

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 30, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2007

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2007

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 2, 2012

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

July 30, 2007

Results QC Date

December 15, 2011

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Treatment-Emergent AEs are events occurring after first drug administration or worsened from baseline. Treatment-Related AEs are those with a definite, probable, possible or missing causality. A serious AE is a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medical event requiring intervention to prevent 1 of the above. A severe or life-threatening AE is based on intensity, according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (NCI-CTCAE) v3.0.

    From Baseline to the interim clinical cut-off date (31 December 2009). The median time on study was 14.8 months, with a range of 26 days to 29.7 months. As of March 1, 2011 the total exposure to ruxolitinib was 269 patient-years.

  • Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement (CI) Over Time

    Clinical improvement was defined according to the International Working Group Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment criteria, and required 1 of the following: 1. A ≥ 2 g/dL increase in Hemoglobin level or becoming transfusion independent; 2. Either a ≥ 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly if spleen was ≥ 10 cm at Baseline or a spleen palpable at \> 5 cm at Baseline becomes not palpable; 3. A ≥ 100% increase in platelet count and an absolute platelet count of ≥ 50,000 x 10\^9/L or 4. A ≥ 100% increase in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and an ANC of ≥ 0.5 x 10\^9/L.

    Week 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Palpation Length Over Time

    Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60

  • Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction From Baseline in Spleen Volume Over Time

    Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48

  • Change From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Total Symptom Score at Week 24

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Health-Related Quality of Life

    Baseline and Week 24

  • Change From Baseline in Body Weight Over Time

    Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Ruxolitinib

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants received oral ruxolitinib. Patients began treatment with either 10 mg twice a day (bid), 15 mg bid, 25 mg bid, 50 mg bid, 25 mg once a day (qd), 50 mg qd, 100 mg qd, or 200 mg qd, depending on the time period when they entered the study. The doses were titrated based on efficacy and safety to a maximum of 25 mg bid for patients who entered the study after sufficient dosing information had been obtained to define the maximum dose for patients in the study. Patients could continue receiving treatment indefinitely if receiving benefit at a dose that continues to maintain benefit but does not exceed a maximum dose of 25 mg BID.

Drug: Ruxolitinib

Interventions

5 and 25 mg tablets with a daily dosing range from 10 to 200 mg qd or bid.

Also known as: INCB018424, Jakafi(TM)
Ruxolitinib

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with PMF or Post-PV/ET MF
  • Patients with myelofibrosis requiring therapy
  • Adequate bone marrow reserve

You may not qualify if:

  • Received anti-cancer medications or investigational therapy in the past 14 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Unknown Facility

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Verstovsek S, Kantarjian H, Mesa RA, Pardanani AD, Cortes-Franco J, Thomas DA, Estrov Z, Fridman JS, Bradley EC, Erickson-Viitanen S, Vaddi K, Levy R, Tefferi A. Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1117-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002028.

  • Verstovsek S, Kantarjian HM, Estrov Z, Cortes JE, Thomas DA, Kadia T, Pierce S, Jabbour E, Borthakur G, Rumi E, Pungolino E, Morra E, Caramazza D, Cazzola M, Passamonti F. Long-term outcomes of 107 patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib: survival advantage in comparison to matched historical controls. Blood. 2012 Aug 9;120(6):1202-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-414631. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

  • Kvasnicka HM, Thiele J, Bueso-Ramos CE, Sun W, Cortes J, Kantarjian HM, Verstovsek S. Long-term effects of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy on bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myelofibrosis. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Mar 15;11(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0585-5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Primary MyelofibrosisPolycythemia VeraThrombocytosis

Interventions

ruxolitinib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myeloproliferative DisordersBone Marrow DiseasesHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesBone Marrow NeoplasmsHematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBlood Platelet Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Incyte Corporation

Study Officials

  • Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD

    M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ayalew Tefferi, MD

    Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2007

First Posted

August 1, 2007

Study Start

June 1, 2007

Primary Completion

December 1, 2007

Study Completion

February 1, 2017

Last Updated

March 12, 2018

Results First Posted

August 2, 2012

Record last verified: 2018-02

Locations