NCT00492284

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to determine if combination therapy (reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis \[within 2 hours\] or either of two regimens of reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy \[within 2 hours\]) reduces retreatment rates compared with Lucentis monotherapy while maintaining similar vision outcomes and an acceptable safety profile.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
162

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2007

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
2 countries

26 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 25, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2007

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2009

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 22, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

June 2, 2011

Status Verified

May 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

June 25, 2007

Results QC Date

April 13, 2010

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

Macular DegenerationAMDCNVChoroidal neovascularizationPhotodynamic therapyCNV Secondary to Age Related Macular Degeneration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)

    Retreatment was defined in the protocol as study treatment administered after Day 0. For the analyses of retreatment, any study treatment that was administered was considered to be a retreatment, and combination therapy was considered to be one retreatment, even though two or three treatment procedures were done. In the combination therapy groups, if a ranibizumab injection was given because retreatment was indicated and the previous combination treatment was less than 2 months before, the ranibizumab injection was counted as a retreatment.

    Month 1 to Month 12

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-corrected VA Score (ETDRS Chart)

    Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method at 4 meters. Worst = 0; best = 100

    Baseline to Month 12

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)

    Month 1 to Month 24

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-Corrected VA Score

    Baseline to Month 24

  • Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Gained From Baseline

    Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24

  • Percentage of Subjects With >=0 Letter Gain of Visual Acuity From Baseline

    Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24

  • Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Lost From Baseline

    Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Very low fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy \[within 2 hours\] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter

Drug: verteporfinDrug: ranibizumabDrug: dexamethasone

1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy \[within 2 hours\] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter

Drug: verteporfinDrug: ranibizumabDrug: dexamethasone

1/2 Fluence Double Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis double therapy \[within 2 hours\] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter

Drug: verteporfinDrug: ranibizumab

Ranibizumab

EXPERIMENTAL

Lucentis monotherapy administered on Day 0, Month 1 and Month 2, and then as required monthly thereafter

Drug: ranibizumab

Interventions

Reduced-fluence Visudyne (25 J/cm2, 300 mW/cm2, 83 seconds)

Also known as: Visudyne, photodynamic therapy
1/2 Fluence Double Therapy1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy

0.5 mg intravitreal injection

Also known as: Lucentis
1/2 Fluence Double Therapy1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy1/4 Fluence Triple TherapyRanibizumab

0.5 mg intravitreal injection

1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Treatment naive for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye except for laser treatment outside the subfoveal area
  • Subfoveal CNV due to AMD
  • CNV must be = or \>50 % of the entire lesion
  • All lesion composition types with a lesion greatest linear dimension (GLD) \< 5400 microns (approximately = or \<9 disc areas \[DA\])
  • Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA score) of 25 - 73 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 - 20/320), inclusive

You may not qualify if:

  • Subfoveal geographic atrophy or subfoveal fibrosis of the study eye
  • Intraocular surgery within 3 months of enrollment
  • Inability to attend the protocol-required visits
  • Known allergies or hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments.
  • Other systemic diseases or active uncontrolled infections that would make subject a poor medical risk
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma, defined as (1)subject is on \>1 glaucoma medication (includes combination treatments) or (2)subject has glaucoma that could lead to progressive visual field deterioration
  • If subject has had a stroke within the last year

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (26)

Unknown Facility

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Retina Centers, PC

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Campbell, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Poway, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sacramento, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Torrance, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Missoula, Montana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Temple, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Seattle, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

London, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Choroidal NeovascularizationMacular Degeneration

Interventions

VerteporfinPhotochemotherapyRanibizumabDexamethasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Choroid DiseasesUveal DiseasesEye DiseasesNeovascularization, PathologicMetaplasiaPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRetinal DegenerationRetinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PorphyrinsTetrapyrrolesPyrrolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingMacrocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsCombined Modality TherapyTherapeuticsDrug TherapyPhototherapyAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsSteroids, Fluorinated

Limitations and Caveats

Retreatment and vision analysis limitations, sample size, lack of standard monotherapy regimen used in practice, no treatment regimen approved by regulatory authorities, potential for bias in FA assessment, no central reading center, single-masked

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Information Department
Organization
QLT Inc.

Study Officials

  • Henry Hudson, MD

    Retina Centers, PC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Allen Ho, MD

    Retina Diagnostic & Treatment Associates, LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Andrew Strong, Ph.D

    QLT Inc.

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Oscar Cuzzani, MD

    QLT Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2007

First Posted

June 27, 2007

Study Start

July 1, 2007

Primary Completion

May 1, 2009

Study Completion

May 1, 2010

Last Updated

June 2, 2011

Results First Posted

June 22, 2010

Record last verified: 2011-05

Locations