Reduced Fluence Visudyne-Anti-VEGF-Dexamethasone In Combination for AMD Lesions (RADICAL)
RADICAL
A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-masked Study Comparing Reduced-fluence Visudyne®-Lucentis® Combination Therapies and Lucentis® Monotherapy in Subjects With Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to AMD.
1 other identifier
interventional
162
2 countries
26
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine if combination therapy (reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis \[within 2 hours\] or either of two regimens of reduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy \[within 2 hours\]) reduces retreatment rates compared with Lucentis monotherapy while maintaining similar vision outcomes and an acceptable safety profile.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jul 2007
Typical duration for phase_2
26 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 22, 2010
CompletedJune 2, 2011
May 1, 2011
1.8 years
June 25, 2007
April 13, 2010
May 31, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)
Retreatment was defined in the protocol as study treatment administered after Day 0. For the analyses of retreatment, any study treatment that was administered was considered to be a retreatment, and combination therapy was considered to be one retreatment, even though two or three treatment procedures were done. In the combination therapy groups, if a ranibizumab injection was given because retreatment was indicated and the previous combination treatment was less than 2 months before, the ranibizumab injection was counted as a retreatment.
Month 1 to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-corrected VA Score (ETDRS Chart)
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method at 4 meters. Worst = 0; best = 100
Baseline to Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mean Number of Retreatments (Day 0 Excluded)
Month 1 to Month 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Study Eye Best-Corrected VA Score
Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Gained From Baseline
Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=0 Letter Gain of Visual Acuity From Baseline
Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
Percentage of Subjects With >=15 Letters of Visual Acuity Lost From Baseline
Baseline to Month 12, Baseline to Month 24
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
1/4 Fluence Triple Therapy
EXPERIMENTALVery low fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy \[within 2 hours\] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter
1/2 Fluence Triple Therapy
EXPERIMENTALReduced-fluence Visudyne followed by intravitreal Lucentis-Dexamethasone triple therapy \[within 2 hours\] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter
1/2 Fluence Double Therapy
EXPERIMENTALReduced-fluence Visudyne followed by Lucentis double therapy \[within 2 hours\] administered on Day 0, and then as required every 2 months thereafter
Ranibizumab
EXPERIMENTALLucentis monotherapy administered on Day 0, Month 1 and Month 2, and then as required monthly thereafter
Interventions
Reduced-fluence Visudyne (25 J/cm2, 300 mW/cm2, 83 seconds)
0.5 mg intravitreal injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Treatment naive for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye except for laser treatment outside the subfoveal area
- Subfoveal CNV due to AMD
- CNV must be = or \>50 % of the entire lesion
- All lesion composition types with a lesion greatest linear dimension (GLD) \< 5400 microns (approximately = or \<9 disc areas \[DA\])
- Best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA score) of 25 - 73 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 - 20/320), inclusive
You may not qualify if:
- Subfoveal geographic atrophy or subfoveal fibrosis of the study eye
- Intraocular surgery within 3 months of enrollment
- Inability to attend the protocol-required visits
- Known allergies or hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments.
- Other systemic diseases or active uncontrolled infections that would make subject a poor medical risk
- Uncontrolled glaucoma, defined as (1)subject is on \>1 glaucoma medication (includes combination treatments) or (2)subject has glaucoma that could lead to progressive visual field deterioration
- If subject has had a stroke within the last year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- QLT Inc.lead
Study Sites (26)
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Retina Centers, PC
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Campbell, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Poway, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Torrance, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Davenport, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Missoula, Montana, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Arlington, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Temple, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Retreatment and vision analysis limitations, sample size, lack of standard monotherapy regimen used in practice, no treatment regimen approved by regulatory authorities, potential for bias in FA assessment, no central reading center, single-masked
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Information Department
- Organization
- QLT Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Henry Hudson, MD
Retina Centers, PC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Allen Ho, MD
Retina Diagnostic & Treatment Associates, LLC
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrew Strong, Ph.D
QLT Inc.
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Oscar Cuzzani, MD
QLT Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2007
First Posted
June 27, 2007
Study Start
July 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 2, 2011
Results First Posted
June 22, 2010
Record last verified: 2011-05