A Pilot Trial of Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical research study is to use computed tomography (CT) scans to measure and guide your radiation therapy. Researchers want to learn if the CT scans can be used to adapt radiation therapy to the changes in normal tissue and to the shrinking of the tumor that may occur as a reaction to radiation therapy. Researchers also want to see if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning can detect certain changes in the tumor any earlier than with standard tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer
Started Jun 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 30, 2020
CompletedDecember 30, 2020
December 1, 2020
7.9 years
June 21, 2007
May 27, 2016
December 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dosimetric Comparisons With Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART) Planning to Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Planning
Comparison of mean dose in the Contralateral Parotid Gland and Ipsilateral Parotid Gland change between one adaptive replan (ART1) and two adaptive replans (ART2) planning relative to standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning. Dosimetric comparisons was performed using paired t-testing between plans, with patients serving as their own controls. The median trigger point for ART1 was the 16th treatment fraction. For ART2 patients, the median trigger points for the first and second replanning were the 11th and the 22nd fractions, respectively. Percent change in mean dose calculated for each group as 100% (mean post baseline (ART1 or ART2) dosage minus mean baseline IMRT dose for each parotid gland
Baseline by IMRT plan and adaptive dosing by ART plan evaluated during a 6-7 week course of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Overall Shrinkage of Tumor With Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART)
Baseline by IMRT plan and adaptive dosing by ART plan evaluated at the end of the 6-7 week course of treatment
Study Arms (1)
Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALIntensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) + Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART)
Interventions
IMRT Treatment Over 6-7 Weeks
ART Treatment Over 6-7 Weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years of age with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, dispositioned to receive definitive radiotherapy for intact primary tumor.
- Stage III, IVa, or IVb disease as defined by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging criteria.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have undergone definitive resection of the primary tumor.
- Prior cancer diagnosis, except appropriately treated localized epithelial skin cancer or cervical cancer.
- Prior radiation therapy to the head and neck region.
- Patients unable or unwilling to give written, informed consent or to undergo MRI imaging.
- Women of childbearing potential (A woman of child-bearing potential is a sexually mature woman who has not undergone a hysterectomy or who has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months \[i.e., who has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months\]) and male participants must practice effective contraception (oral, injectable, or implantable hormonal contraceptive; tubal ligation; intra-uterine device; barrier contraceptive with spermicide; or vasectomized partner) throughout the study
- Patients unable to tolerate DW-MRI or DCE-MRI or having an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 60 ml/min/1.73m2.
- Patients who have had prior chemotherapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Adam Garden, MD/Radiation Oncology Department
- Organization
- The University of Texas (UT) MD Anderson Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam Garden, MD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2007
First Posted
June 22, 2007
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 30, 2020
Results First Posted
December 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12