Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for in Detecting Tumors During Treatment in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
3 other identifiers
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial studies image-guided adaptive radiotherapy in detecting tumors during treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. Image-guided adaptive radiotherapy uses high quality imaging technology to detect the tumor and normal organs during treatment. It is not yet known which imaging technique provides the best image for guidance during treatment with radiation therapy. Comparing results of imaging procedures done before, during, and after radiotherapy may help doctors plan the best treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer
Started Jan 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 21, 2016
CompletedJuly 6, 2016
May 1, 2016
6 years
April 26, 2013
December 18, 2015
May 26, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Differences of Calculated Set up Errors of 2 mm Between the Different Imaging Technologies
The automated patient setup procedure varies between 'OBI', 'CBCT' or 'Exactrac' imaging technologies. Each procedure gives two shifts: 'vertical' and 'lateral'. In the absence of a gold standard, our goal is to compare the shifts recommended by each pair of automated patient setup procedures. Average and Std deviation of vertical and lateral motion from the three systems were computed. P value, 1.00, refers to the test of difference of each system with OBI being more than 2 mm. Pairwise comparison for each direction between each pair of technologies were done using a t test to check if the difference in the recommended shift is more than 2 mm. The reported mean value represents the shift from planned treatment position averaged over all daily treatment setups. A negative mean vertical value indicates the patient was consistently set up posterior to plan; a negative mean lateral value indicates a set up consistently right of plan.
up to 7 weeks
Dose Variation Between the Different Imaging Technologies for Normal Tissue Structures of 10%
Up to 7 weeks
Greater Than or Equal to 5% Variation of Normal Tissue Toxicity
Up to 7 weeks
Study Arms (1)
in-room imaging systems
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo FBCT once before treatment and once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, dual CBCT up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, and EPID imaging up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans while undergoing IGART.
Interventions
Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI
Undergo IGART
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologic or cytologic confirmation of head and neck malignancy
- Patients who will be treated with definitive radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy
- Gross tumor volume (GTV) must be visible on CT
- All patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and must give written informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or nursing women may not participate; women of reproductive potential must be offered a pre-treatment pregnancy test and informed of the need to practice an effective contraceptive method
- Prior treatment with radiation therapy to the head and neck
- Serum creatinine \> 1.5 and/or
- Blood urea nitrogen \[BUN\] \> 25
- Treatment with any prior chemotherapy or surgery (excluding diagnostic biopsy) for this malignancy
- Patients with known syndromes expected to alter radiosensitivity (e.g. ataxia-telangiectasia, scleroderma, lupus, human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\]/acquired immunodeficiency deficiency syndrome \[AIDS\]) may not participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Joshua Evans, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Virginia Commonwealth University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua Evans, PhD
Virginia Commonwealth University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2013
First Posted
April 30, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 6, 2016
Results First Posted
March 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05