Study Stopped
Protocol was cancelled by company based on overall efficacy, no safety concern
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Golimumab in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab Induction Therapy, Administered Intravenously, in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
3 other identifiers
interventional
291
20 countries
106
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects (good and bad) of golimumab (CNTO 148) therapy in participants with active ulcerative colitis (UC) (sores in the colon).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2007
106 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 14, 2013
CompletedJune 14, 2013
April 1, 2013
1.8 years
June 18, 2007
April 29, 2013
April 29, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Clinical Response
Clinical response is defined as decrease from baseline in Mayo score by greater than or equal to 30 percent and greater than or equal to 3, with either a decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding sub-score of greater than or equal to 1 or a rectal bleeding sub-score of 0 or 1. The Mayo score is sum of 4 sub-scores (i.e., stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopic findings, and a physician's global assessment); each rated on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total Mayo score value ranges from 0 to 12.
Week 6
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission
Week 6
Study Arms (4)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORMatching placebo for golimumab, intravenous (IV) (through a vein in the arm) infusion administered at Week 0
Golimumab 1 milligram (mg) per kilogram (kg)
EXPERIMENTALGolimumab 1 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0.
Golimumab 2 mg per kg
EXPERIMENTALGolimumab 2 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0.
Golimumab 4 mg per kg
EXPERIMENTALGolimumab 4 mg per kg, intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0.
Interventions
Golimumab 1 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0
Golimumab 2 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion administered at Week 0
Golimumab 4 mg per kg intravenous (IV) infusion at Week 0
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants diagnosed with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) defined by a Mayo score of 6 to 12 inclusive at Baseline (Week 0), including an endoscopic (examination of an internal part of the body with a lighted tube; looking at a part of the body with a lighted tube) subscore of greater than or equal to 2
- Participants must have biopsy results (collected at the screening endoscopy (procedure or obtained within the last year) consistent with the diagnosis of UC
- Participants either currently receiving treatment with, or have a history of failure to respond to, or tolerate, at least 1 of the following therapies: oral 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASAs), oral corticosteroids, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and azathioprine (AZA)
- Participants with current dependency or with a history of corticosteroid dependency (i.e. an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without a return of the symptoms of UC) - Not have a diagnosis of active TB
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with previous exposure to biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents
- Participants with severe extensive UC that is likely to require a colectomy (surgery to remove part or all of the colon) within 12 weeks of study entry
- Participants having UC limited to the rectum only or to less than 20 centimeter (cm) of the colon
- Presence of a stoma (an artificial permanent opening especially in the abdominal wall made in surgical procedures) or presence of a fistula
- Participants with a history of extensive colonic resection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLClead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (108)
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Roseville, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Littleton, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Dodge, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Topeka, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Laurel, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Dearborn, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Troy, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Mexico, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Unknown Facility
Great Neck, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Huntington, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Kinston, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Galveston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Unknown Facility
Christiansburg, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Adelaide, Australia
Unknown Facility
Brisbane, Australia
Unknown Facility
Malvern, Australia
Unknown Facility
Innsbruck, Austria
Unknown Facility
Bonheiden, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Rousse, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Unknown Facility
Clichy, France
Unknown Facility
Lille, France
Unknown Facility
Nice, France
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Herne, Germany
Unknown Facility
Magdeburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Békéscsaba, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyõr, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyulai Ut 18, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Miskolc, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Pécs, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Székesfehérvár, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szombathely, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Hyderabad Andh Prad, India
Unknown Facility
Jaipur, India
Unknown Facility
Lucknow, India
Unknown Facility
Ludhiana, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, India
Unknown Facility
Afula, Israel
Unknown Facility
Hedera, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, Israel
Unknown Facility
Kfar Saba, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Aviv, Israel
Unknown Facility
Daugavpils, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Šiauliai, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius LT, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Groningen, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Leiden, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Auckland, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Hastings, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Częstochowa, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Skierniewice, Poland
Unknown Facility
Sopot, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Timișoara, Romania
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yaroslavl, Russia
Unknown Facility
Belgrade, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Nitra, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Prešov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Gothenburg, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Donetsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ivano, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Vynnytsya, Ukraine
Related Publications (2)
Adedokun OJ, Xu Z, Liao S, Strauss R, Reinisch W, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ. Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Modeling of Golimumab in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Ther. 2020 Jan;42(1):157-174.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
PMID: 31982148DERIVEDRutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Marano CW, Padgett L, Strauss R, Johanns J, Adedokun OJ, Guzzo C, Zhang H, Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Gibson PR, Sandborn WJ; PURSUIT-IV study group. Randomised clinical trial: a placebo-controlled study of intravenous golimumab induction therapy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;42(5):504-14. doi: 10.1111/apt.13291. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
PMID: 26119226DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Data collection was not considered complete for primary outcome measure because study was terminated prematurely.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2007
First Posted
June 20, 2007
Study Start
August 1, 2007
Primary Completion
May 1, 2009
Study Completion
May 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 14, 2013
Results First Posted
June 14, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04