NCT00475540

Brief Summary

The primary aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to test the hypothesis that the addition of a standardized technique of interpositional synthetic polypropylene mesh placement improves the one-year outcome of vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse compared to traditional vaginal reconstructive surgery without mesh.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
65

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2007

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 17, 2007

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2007

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2013

Completed
9.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 12, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 12, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5.6 years

First QC Date

May 17, 2007

Results QC Date

November 18, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 13, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

prolapseuteruspelvic organvaginal prolpase

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Anatomic Cure at 3 Years

    3 different measures for Anatomic cure using POPQ measurements: 1. POP-Q at Stage I or less\* (POP-Q points Ba, Bp or C -1 or less); 2. no prolapse beyond the hymen (Ba, Bp or C 0 or less); 3. no prolapse beyond the hymen (Ba, Bp 0 or less) with adequate apical support above the midvagina (C to TVL/2 or less) No bulge symptoms using Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, PFDI question 3; do you see or feel a bulge in the vaginal area with response of no. Patient Satisfaction using Patient Global Impression of Improvement with response of very much better or much better

    3 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Bothersome Dyspareunia

    3 year

Study Arms (2)

Prolift mesh

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

vaginal prolapse repair with mesh

Device: synthetic monofilament polypropylene mesh

Prolapse repair without mesh

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

vaginal prolapse repair without mesh

Device: synthetic monofilament polypropylene mesh

Interventions

Vaginal prolapse repair with mesh

Also known as: Prolift
Prolapse repair without meshProlift mesh

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Woman \> 21 yrs
  • Stage II-IV vaginal prolapse
  • Desires vaginal reconstructive surgery
  • Able to complete study questionnaires and assessments
  • Uterus \< 12 weeks size
  • Available for 12 months follow-up

You may not qualify if:

  • Medical contraindications, e.g. current urinary tract, vaginal or pelvic infection, history of pelvic irradiation, history of lower urinary tract malignancy, chronic steroid use or a compromised immune system.
  • Current intermittent catheterization.
  • Pregnancy or desire for future fertility.
  • Presence of an adnexal mass.
  • Shortened vagina or other known Mullerian anomaly (e.g. uterine didelphys).
  • Other laparoscopic or abdominal/pelvic surgery in the past 3 months.
  • Known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function, e.g. Multiple Sclerosis, spinal cord injury.
  • Need for concomitant surgery requiring an abdominal incision.
  • \< 12 months post-partum.
  • Non-english speaking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Gutman RE, Nosti PA, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Peterson JL, Wang H, Iglesia CB. Three-year outcomes of vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):770-777. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a49dac.

  • Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, Shott S. Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;116(2 Pt 1):293-303. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e7d7f8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapseUterine ProlapseCystoceleRectoceleProlapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesRectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesHernia

Results Point of Contact

Title
Allie Moses, Manager, Clinical Research Systems and Recruitment Center
Organization
MedStar Health Research Institute

Study Officials

  • Cheryl Iglesia, MD

    Medstar Health Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2007

First Posted

May 21, 2007

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

August 1, 2013

Last Updated

October 12, 2022

Results First Posted

October 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Locations