Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
VAMP
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to test the hypothesis that the addition of a standardized technique of interpositional synthetic polypropylene mesh placement improves the one-year outcome of vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse compared to traditional vaginal reconstructive surgery without mesh.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 12, 2022
CompletedOctober 12, 2022
July 1, 2022
5.6 years
May 17, 2007
November 18, 2021
September 13, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Anatomic Cure at 3 Years
3 different measures for Anatomic cure using POPQ measurements: 1. POP-Q at Stage I or less\* (POP-Q points Ba, Bp or C -1 or less); 2. no prolapse beyond the hymen (Ba, Bp or C 0 or less); 3. no prolapse beyond the hymen (Ba, Bp 0 or less) with adequate apical support above the midvagina (C to TVL/2 or less) No bulge symptoms using Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, PFDI question 3; do you see or feel a bulge in the vaginal area with response of no. Patient Satisfaction using Patient Global Impression of Improvement with response of very much better or much better
3 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Bothersome Dyspareunia
3 year
Study Arms (2)
Prolift mesh
ACTIVE COMPARATORvaginal prolapse repair with mesh
Prolapse repair without mesh
ACTIVE COMPARATORvaginal prolapse repair without mesh
Interventions
Vaginal prolapse repair with mesh
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Woman \> 21 yrs
- Stage II-IV vaginal prolapse
- Desires vaginal reconstructive surgery
- Able to complete study questionnaires and assessments
- Uterus \< 12 weeks size
- Available for 12 months follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Medical contraindications, e.g. current urinary tract, vaginal or pelvic infection, history of pelvic irradiation, history of lower urinary tract malignancy, chronic steroid use or a compromised immune system.
- Current intermittent catheterization.
- Pregnancy or desire for future fertility.
- Presence of an adnexal mass.
- Shortened vagina or other known Mullerian anomaly (e.g. uterine didelphys).
- Other laparoscopic or abdominal/pelvic surgery in the past 3 months.
- Known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function, e.g. Multiple Sclerosis, spinal cord injury.
- Need for concomitant surgery requiring an abdominal incision.
- \< 12 months post-partum.
- Non-english speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Related Publications (2)
Gutman RE, Nosti PA, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Peterson JL, Wang H, Iglesia CB. Three-year outcomes of vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):770-777. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a49dac.
PMID: 24084533DERIVEDIglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL, Shott S. Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;116(2 Pt 1):293-303. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e7d7f8.
PMID: 20664388DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Allie Moses, Manager, Clinical Research Systems and Recruitment Center
- Organization
- MedStar Health Research Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cheryl Iglesia, MD
Medstar Health Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2007
First Posted
May 21, 2007
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 12, 2022
Results First Posted
October 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07