SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of R-SCP versus HUSLS for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 3, 2025
January 1, 2025
9 years
April 26, 2016
January 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (pop-q) to asses change post operatively
Pelvic organ prolapses are graded with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System.
3 month post operative
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (pop-q) to asses change post operatively
Pelvic organ prolapses are graded with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System.
6 month post operative
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (pop-q) to asses change post operatively
Pelvic organ prolapses are graded with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System.
12 month post operative
Secondary Outcomes (8)
questionnaires PFDI-7
6 month post operative
questionnaires PFDI-7
12 month post operative
questionnaires PFIQ-20
6 month post operative
questionnaires PFIQ-20
12 month post operative
questionnaires PISQ-12
6 month post operative
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sacrocolpopexy
ACTIVE COMPARATORRobotic sacrocolpopexy
HUSLS
ACTIVE COMPARATORVaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension
Interventions
Sacrocolpopexy is a procedure to surgically correct vaginal vault prolapse where mesh is used to hold the vagina in the correct anatomical position. Robotic assistance is a minimally invasive method to perform this abdominal procedure.
Utilizing uterosacral ligaments to support the vaginal cuff can be performed vaginally-by passing sutures bilaterally through the uterosacral ligaments. near the level of the ischial spine. HUSLS is a vaginal minimally invasive procedure for POP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Years of age or older
- Signed Informed Consent
- Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse,
- Willing and able to complete all study visit
You may not qualify if:
- Non-High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension (unable to do HUSLS at time of surgery),
- Dementia or considered unable to complete questionnaires
- Hx of Alzheimer Disease
- Hx multiple strokes or other neurologic condition
- Caregiver states the subject is unable to complete
- MDs opinion
- Inability to complete follow up visits due to transportation issues
- No access to transportation (ie. does not have vehicle)
- Live \> 2 hours from LLUH
- Does not have financial means
- Congenital anomalies
- Bladder Exstrophy
- Connective tissue disease
- Neovaginal prolapse
- Prolapse of sex change vagina
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loma Linda University URO/GYN
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
Related Publications (2)
Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.040.
PMID: 16813916BACKGROUNDMargulies RU, Rogers MA, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;202(2):124-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.052.
PMID: 20113690BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sam Siddighi
Loma Linda University Health Care
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2016
First Posted
June 15, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share