Vaginal Prolapse
32
3
4
19
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
95% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 30/100
3.1%
1 terminated out of 32 trials
95.0%
+8.5% vs benchmark
28%
9 trials in Phase 3/4
32%
6 of 19 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 19 completed trials
Clinical Trials (32)
Cross-Shaped Vaginal Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
BELIEVE Trial: Bulking vErsus sLing for Treating Stress Urinary IncontinEnce at the Time of Vaginal prolapsE Repair (BELIEVE)
Effects of Kegel Ball and Pelvic Floor Exercises on Sexual Function, Unrınary Incontinence and Quality of Life in Women
Prospective Observational Prolapse Study
Treatment of Vaginal Atrophy With Low Intensity Nanosecond Neodymium Laser
Clinical Trial of "Magic Gyno" Laser Device
Sacrocolpopexy With Posterior Repair Obstructed Defecation Symptoms
The Impact of Long-term Pessary Use on Pelvic Organ Prolapse oìduring Covid-19 Pandemic in Patients Attending Surgery
Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina Using Estrogen
Lessons on Urethral Lidocaine in Urodynamics
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
Continuous Stitches Versus Simple Interrupted Stitches for Anterior Colporrhaphy
Pudendal Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Standard Treatment During Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation
Dexamethasone Administration To Improve Patient Recovery In Ambulatory Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Is There A Role?
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
Physiologic Elasticity Changes During Pregnancy and After Labor.
Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
0050-19-RMB CTIL - VNOTES Compared to VH for Vaginal Apex Prolapse
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Repair With Elevate