Using Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) in Routine Clinical Care
An Assessment of the Effects of the Use of Measures of Health-related Quality of Life in Routine Clinical Care:an Application to Lung Transplantation.
1 other identifier
observational
213
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the effects of using HRQL measures in the clinical care of pre- and post-lung transplant patients. The hypotheses are that the inclusion of HRQL measures, the Health Utilities Index System Mark 2(HUI2) and Mark 3 (HUI3), in routine clinical care of pre- and post-lung transplant patients, will: 1) improve patient-clinician communication;2) affect patient management; 3) improve patients' HRQL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2005
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 22, 2009
CompletedApril 1, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.8 years
April 4, 2007
April 15, 2009
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Communication Score
Each clinician-patient encounter was audio tape-recorded. The content of the tape-recordings was examined and results recorded on the communication form by three blinded raters. This form tallies the number of issues discussed. The number of issues is summed to produce a communication score. The issues discussed included health attributes included in the HUI2 and HUI3: ambulation, self-care, anxiety, depression, cognitive problems, pain (type and frequency), vision, hearing speech and dexterity problems.
Baseline and end of study (6 months)
Management Composite
Changes in clinical management were recorded in the chart review form. The number of referrals to other healthcare providers, tests ordered (X-rays, blood test, bronchoscopies) and changes in medication (reduction or increase dosage, addition or discontinuation) were summed to produce the management composite.
At baseline and end of study (6 months)
EuroQol, EQ-5D.
Generic preference-based measure. EQ-5D consists of two sections: a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS) and a descriptive system that contains five attributes (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with three levels per attribute ("no problem", "some problems" and "extreme problems").Using the US scoring function EQ-5D index scores range from -0.11 (all-worst health state, worse than dead), to 0.00 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). The EQ-5D is easy to complete, valid and reliable.
At baseline and end of study (6 months).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale,HADS. Completed at Baseline and End of the Study.
Baseline and end of study (6 months)
Study Arms (1)
Control
Interventions
Patients completed the HUI2 and HUI3 before the encounter with the clinician, the result was graphically represented in the HUI score card. Clinicians used the HUI score card as an extra tool to help them in the management of the patients
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pre-lung transplant:subjects who are included on the waiting list and are being seen at the out-patient clinic
- post-lung transplant subjects.
You may not qualify if:
- younger than 18 years of age
- diagnosed as being cognitively impaired
- unable to complete questionnaires in English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Albertalead
- Institute of Health Economics, Canadacollaborator
- Roche Pharma AGcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Randomizing patients instead of clinicians lead to sensitizing effects. EQ-5D is a generic preference-based measure, a specific measure should have been used to maximize responsiveness.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Maria Jose Santana
- Organization
- Lung transplant program, University of Alberta Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David H Feeny, PhD
Professor Economics, University of Alberta
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2007
First Posted
April 6, 2007
Study Start
July 1, 2005
Primary Completion
April 1, 2007
Study Completion
May 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 1, 2020
Results First Posted
September 22, 2009
Record last verified: 2020-03