NCT00457301

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to assess the effects of using HRQL measures in the clinical care of pre- and post-lung transplant patients. The hypotheses are that the inclusion of HRQL measures, the Health Utilities Index System Mark 2(HUI2) and Mark 3 (HUI3), in routine clinical care of pre- and post-lung transplant patients, will: 1) improve patient-clinician communication;2) affect patient management; 3) improve patients' HRQL.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
213

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2005

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2005

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2007

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2007

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2007

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2008

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 22, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

April 1, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

April 4, 2007

Results QC Date

April 15, 2009

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Lung transplantation, health-related quality of life.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Communication Score

    Each clinician-patient encounter was audio tape-recorded. The content of the tape-recordings was examined and results recorded on the communication form by three blinded raters. This form tallies the number of issues discussed. The number of issues is summed to produce a communication score. The issues discussed included health attributes included in the HUI2 and HUI3: ambulation, self-care, anxiety, depression, cognitive problems, pain (type and frequency), vision, hearing speech and dexterity problems.

    Baseline and end of study (6 months)

  • Management Composite

    Changes in clinical management were recorded in the chart review form. The number of referrals to other healthcare providers, tests ordered (X-rays, blood test, bronchoscopies) and changes in medication (reduction or increase dosage, addition or discontinuation) were summed to produce the management composite.

    At baseline and end of study (6 months)

  • EuroQol, EQ-5D.

    Generic preference-based measure. EQ-5D consists of two sections: a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS) and a descriptive system that contains five attributes (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with three levels per attribute ("no problem", "some problems" and "extreme problems").Using the US scoring function EQ-5D index scores range from -0.11 (all-worst health state, worse than dead), to 0.00 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health). The EQ-5D is easy to complete, valid and reliable.

    At baseline and end of study (6 months).

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale,HADS. Completed at Baseline and End of the Study.

    Baseline and end of study (6 months)

Study Arms (1)

Control

Behavioral: HUI score card

Interventions

HUI score cardBEHAVIORAL

Patients completed the HUI2 and HUI3 before the encounter with the clinician, the result was graphically represented in the HUI score card. Clinicians used the HUI score card as an extra tool to help them in the management of the patients

Also known as: Health Utilities Index Score Card
Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • pre-lung transplant:subjects who are included on the waiting list and are being seen at the out-patient clinic
  • post-lung transplant subjects.

You may not qualify if:

  • younger than 18 years of age
  • diagnosed as being cognitively impaired
  • unable to complete questionnaires in English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonary FibrosisHypertension, PulmonaryCystic Fibrosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsLung Diseases, InterstitialFibrosisHypertensionVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesInfant, Newborn, Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Randomizing patients instead of clinicians lead to sensitizing effects. EQ-5D is a generic preference-based measure, a specific measure should have been used to maximize responsiveness.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Maria Jose Santana
Organization
Lung transplant program, University of Alberta Hospital

Study Officials

  • David H Feeny, PhD

    Professor Economics, University of Alberta

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2007

First Posted

April 6, 2007

Study Start

July 1, 2005

Primary Completion

April 1, 2007

Study Completion

May 1, 2008

Last Updated

April 1, 2020

Results First Posted

September 22, 2009

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations