NCT00399035

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if Cediranib when added to chemotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy alone in prolonging life expectancy and slowing disease progression in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,254

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2006

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
15 countries

90 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2006

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2006

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 14, 2006

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2010

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 30, 2012

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 28, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

November 13, 2006

Results QC Date

March 29, 2012

Last Update Submit

November 7, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Colorectal CancerCediranibRECENTIN

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Progression-free Survival

    RECIST criteria defined as follows: Target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR) At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.Progressive Disease (PD) At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began).Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Non-target lesions Complete Response (CR) Disappearance of all non-target lesions Non-Complete Response (non-CR/Non- Progression \[non-PD\]) Persistence of one or more non-target lesion or/and maintenance of tumour marker level above the normal limits. Progression (PD) Unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.

    RECIST assessed at baseline every 6 weeks through to week 24 and 12 week thereafter through to progression or data cut off date of 21/03/10 whichever was earliest.

  • Overall Survival

    Number of months from randomisation to the date of death from any cause

    Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Overall Response Rate

    Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

  • Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size

    Baseline through to date of death upto and including data cut off date of 21/03/10

  • Duration of Response

    Treatment period from initial response up until data cut-off date of 21/03/10

  • Rate of Resection of Liver Metastases

    Post-randomisation until end of study

  • Time to Wound Healing Complications

    Post-randomisation until end of study

Study Arms (4)

FOLFOX + placebo Cediranib

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

FOLFOX + placebo Cediranib

Drug: FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin)Drug: Cediranib Placebo

Xelox + placebo Cediranib

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Xelox + placebo Cediranib

Drug: XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin)Drug: Cediranib Placebo

FOLFOX + Cediranib

EXPERIMENTAL

FOLFOX + Cediranib

Drug: CediranibDrug: FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin)

XELOX + Cediranib

EXPERIMENTAL

XELOX + Cediranib

Drug: CediranibDrug: XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin)

Interventions

oral tablet

Also known as: AZD2171, RECENTIN™
FOLFOX + CediranibXELOX + Cediranib

intravenous infusion

Also known as: Other Names:, 5-FU, Drug: Leucovorin (in FOLFOX), intravenous infusion, Drug: Oxaliplatin (in FOLFOX), Eloxatin®
FOLFOX + CediranibFOLFOX + placebo Cediranib

intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/ m\^2(day 1) followed by oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/ m\^2twice daily (day 1 to day 15)

Also known as: Xeloda® + Eloxatin®
XELOX + CediranibXelox + placebo Cediranib

oral tablet

FOLFOX + placebo CediranibXelox + placebo Cediranib

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 130 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written Informed Consent
  • Carcinoma of the colon or rectum
  • One or more measurable lesions

You may not qualify if:

  • Adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy within 6-12 months of study entry
  • Untreated unstable brain or meningeal metastases
  • Specific laboratory ranges
  • Specific cardiovascular problems
  • Participation in other trials within 30 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (90)

Research Site

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Capital Federal, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Córdoba, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Resistencia, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Rosario, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Santa Fe, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Ashford, Australia

Location

Research Site

Camperdown, Australia

Location

Research Site

Heidelberg, Australia

Location

Research Site

Hornsby, Australia

Location

Research Site

Liverpool, Australia

Location

Research Site

Waratah, Australia

Location

Research Site

Wodonga, Australia

Location

Research Site

Curitiba, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Goiânia, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Jaú, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Salvador, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Santo André, Brazil

Location

Research Site

São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Varna, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Vratsa, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Beijing, China

Location

Research Site

Changchun, China

Location

Research Site

Chengdu, China

Location

Research Site

Chongqing, China

Location

Research Site

Fuzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Guangzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Hangzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Nanjing, China

Location

Research Site

Nanning, China

Location

Research Site

Shanghai, China

Location

Research Site

Tianjin, China

Location

Research Site

Brno, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Cheb, Czechia

Location

Research Site

České Budějovice, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Jičín, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Jihlava, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Olomouc, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Ostrava, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Prague, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Pribram - Zdabor, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Šumperk, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Zlín, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Znojmo, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Essen, Germany

Location

Research Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Location

Research Site

Goslar, Germany

Location

Research Site

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Research Site

Hildesheim, Germany

Location

Research Site

Mannheim, Germany

Location

Research Site

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Debrecen, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Győr, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Kecskemét, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Szombathely, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Zalaegerszeg, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Hyderabad, India

Location

Research Site

Trivandrum, India

Location

Research Site

Cebu City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Davao City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Iloilo City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Quezon, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Quezon City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Location

Research Site

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Research Site

Gliwice, Poland

Location

Research Site

Krakow, Poland

Location

Research Site

Olsztyn, Poland

Location

Research Site

Torun, Poland

Location

Research Site

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Research Site

Goyang-si, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Bellinzona, Switzerland

Location

Research Site

Lausanne, Switzerland

Location

Research Site

Locarno, Switzerland

Location

Research Site

Zurich, Switzerland

Location

Research Site

Tainan, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Belfast, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Leicester, United Kingdom

Location

Research Site

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Smith JC, Brooks L, Hoff PM, McWalter G, Dearden S, Morgan SR, Wilson D, Robertson JD, Jurgensmeier JM. KRAS mutations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but are not predictive for benefit with cediranib. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

cediranibFolfox protocolFluorouracilLeucovorinOxaliplatinInfusions, IntravenousXELOXCapecitabine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

UracilPyrimidinonesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsFormyltetrahydrofolatesTetrahydrofolatesFolic AcidPterinsPteridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingCoenzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesCoordination ComplexesOrganic ChemicalsAdministration, IntravenousDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeuticsInfusions, ParenteralDeoxycytidineCytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesDeoxyribonucleosidesNucleosidesNucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides

Results Point of Contact

Title
Gerard Lynch
Organization
AstraZeneca

Study Officials

  • Jane Robertson

    AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2006

First Posted

November 14, 2006

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion

March 1, 2010

Study Completion

August 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 28, 2016

Results First Posted

October 30, 2012

Record last verified: 2016-10

Locations