Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Undergoing Surgery for High-Risk Rectal Cancer
EXPERT-C
A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Clinical Trial Comparing Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), Capecitabine (Xeloda) and Pre-Operative Radiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision for the Treatment of Patients With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Defined High Risk Rectal Cancer
6 other identifiers
interventional
164
3 countries
13
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as oxaliplatin and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Giving chemotherapy and radiation therapy with or without cetuximab before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. It is not yet known whether giving oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and radiation therapy is more effective with or without cetuximab when given before surgery in treating rectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and radiation therapy to compare how well they work with or without cetuximab in treating patients undergoing surgery for high-risk rectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 colorectal-cancer
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2006
CompletedJanuary 13, 2010
January 1, 2010
September 29, 2006
January 12, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pathological complete response rate at time of total mesorectal excision (TME)
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Radiological response rates after completion of neoadjuvant therapy
Complete resection rate (R0 resection) with microscopic clear resection margin (tumor observed > 1 mm from the resection margin), especially circumferential resection margin
Perioperative measures, including operation time, duration of in-patient stay, perioperative transfusion requirement, and mortality, within 30 days of TME
Postoperative complications, including wound infection, wound dehiscence, and fistula formation
Quality of TME as assessed by audit of photographed surgical specimens
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010, Spain
Karolinska University Hospital - Solna
Stockholm, S-171 76, Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, S-75185, Sweden
Royal Bournemouth Hospital NHS Trust
Bournemouth, England, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton, England, BN2 5BE, United Kingdom
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Eastbourne, England, BN21 2UD, United Kingdom
Cancer Research UK Clinical Groups at Guy's King's & St. Thomas' Hospitals
London, England, SE5 9NU, United Kingdom
Mid Kent Oncology Centre at Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone, England, ME16 9QQ, United Kingdom
Dorset Cancer Centre
Poole Dorset, England, BH15 2JB, United Kingdom
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Royal Marsden - Surrey
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
David Cunningham, MD
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2006
First Posted
October 3, 2006
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Last Updated
January 13, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-01