NCT00383214

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Epratuzumab with standard treatments for patients with SLE.

Trial Health

68
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2005

Geographic Reach
11 countries

60 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2005

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 29, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 3, 2006

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

June 7, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

September 29, 2006

Last Update Submit

June 6, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Lupus,antibody,B-cell immunotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient response variable (complete response, partial response, non-response) evaluated at 24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Proportion of patients with complete response or partial response;

  • Individual BILAG assessments;

  • Physician and patient assessment scores;

  • Time-to treatment failure;

  • Successful steroid reduction by weeks 20 and 24;

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Epratuzumab

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

360 mg/m2 or 720 mg/m2 delivered by slow intravenous infusion

Drug: Epratuzumab

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Intravenous

Other: Placebo

Interventions

360 mg/m2 or 720 mg/m2 delivered by slow intravenous infusion

Epratuzumab
PlaceboOTHER

Intravenous

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • +ANA at screening
  • BILAG Index B Level Activity in at least 2 body systems/organs
  • Has SLE by ACR revised criteria (meets,\<4 criteria)

You may not qualify if:

  • Active Severe Lupus as defined by BILAG Index Level A in any body system or organ.
  • Allergy to human antibodies or Murine.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (60)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Upland, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Denver, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Aventura, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Plainview, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Syracuse, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

The Bronx, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Edmonds, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Liège, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

Goiânia, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

São Paulo, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

Sorocaba, Brazil

Location

Unknown Facility

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Hradec Králové, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Olomouc, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prague, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Paris, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Toulouse, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Erlangen, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Heidelberg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Mannheim, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

München, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Ancona, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Brescia, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Groningen, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Leiden, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Santander, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Seville, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

London, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Sheffield, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Interventions

epratuzumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Anna Barry

    UCB Pharma

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2006

First Posted

October 3, 2006

Study Start

May 1, 2005

Primary Completion

March 1, 2007

Study Completion

March 1, 2007

Last Updated

June 7, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations