Exemestane, Letrozole, or Anastrozole in Treating Postmenopausal Women Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Stage II or Stage III Breast Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing 16 to 18 Weeks of Neoadjuvant Exemestane (25 mg Daily), Letrozole (2.5 mg), or Anastrozole (1 mg) in Postmenopausal Women With Clinical Stage II and III Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
622
1 country
3
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Estrogen can cause the growth of breast cancer cells. Hormone therapy using exemestane, letrozole, or anastrozole, may fight breast cancer by lowering the amount of estrogen the body makes. Giving exemestane, letrozole, or anastrozole before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. It is not yet known whether exemestane, letrozole, or anastrozole is more effective in treating breast cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying exemestane, letrozole, and anastrozole to compare how well they work in treating postmenopausal women who are undergoing surgery for stage II or stage III breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Jan 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_3 breast-cancer
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 27, 2019
CompletedApril 23, 2025
April 1, 2025
6.6 years
December 14, 2005
February 14, 2017
April 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Response (Complete or Partial Response) Rate (Cohort A)
The clinical response rate (percentage) of a given treatment is defined as 100 times the number of eligible patients randomized to that treatment whose disease meets the WHO criteria for complete or partial response prior to surgery divided by the total number of eligible patients randomized to that treatment. For each treatment arm, a 95% binomial confidence interval will be constructed for the true clinical response rate. Complete Response (CR): The disappearance of all known disease based on a comparison between the measurements at baseline and the Week 16 visit. Partial Response (PR): A 50% or greater decrease in the product of the bi-dimensional measurements of the lesion (total tumor size) based on a comparison between the measurements at baseline and the Week 16 visit. In addition there can be no appearance of new lesions or progression of any lesion.
Up to 18 weeks
Anti-tumor Effect in Terms of Pathologic CR (pCR) Rate to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (Cohort B)
The primary aim is to assess the anti-tumor effect in terms of pathologic CR rates of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2-T4c, any N, M0 breast cancer (by clinical staging) who are endocrine therapy resistant (that is, their Ki-67 level is \>10 after 2-4 week of neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy alone). The pCR rate (percentage) for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is defined as 100 times the number of eligible patients with no histologic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and the axillary or sentinel lymph nodes divided by the total number of eligible patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Up to 18 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Toxicity (Cohort A)
Up to 30 days after drug therapy
Disease-free Survival (DFS) (Cohort A and B)
5 years
Rate of Improved Surgical Outcome for Patients Considered Marginal for Breast Conservation Surgery Prior to Therapy (Cohort A)
At time of surgery up to 18 weeks
Rate of Downstaging to Stage I Determined by Sentinel Node Evaluation (Cohort A)
At time of surgery up to 18 weeks
Rate of Lymph Node Involvement (LNI) (Cohort A)
At time of surgery up to 18 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Arm I
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive oral exemestane once daily for up to 16-18 weeks.
Arm II
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive oral letrozole once daily for up to 16-18 weeks.
Arm III
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive oral anastrozole once daily for up to 16-18 weeks.
Interventions
Undergo partial or radical mastectomy or lumpectomy with or without lymph node dissection
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncologylead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Cancer and Leukemia Group Bcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, United States
Doctor's Hospital of Laredo
Laredo, Texas, 78041, United States
Related Publications (3)
Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J, Lin L, Snider J, Prat A, Parker JS, Luo J, DeSchryver K, Allred DC, Esserman LJ, Unzeitig GW, Margenthaler J, Babiera GV, Marcom PK, Guenther JM, Watson MA, Leitch M, Hunt K, Olson JA. Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2342-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6950. Epub 2011 May 9.
PMID: 21555689RESULTEllis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J, Goncalves R, Sanati S, Creighton CJ, DeSchryver K, Crouch E, Brink A, Watson M, Luo J, Tao Y, Barnes M, Dowsett M, Budd GT, Winer E, Silverman P, Esserman L, Carey L, Ma CX, Unzeitig G, Pluard T, Whitworth P, Babiera G, Guenther JM, Dayao Z, Ota D, Leitch M, Olson JA Jr, Allred DC, Hunt K. Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;35(10):1061-1069. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4406. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
PMID: 28045625RESULTPunturi NB, Seker S, Devarakonda V, Mazumder A, Kalra R, Chen CH, Li S, Primeau T, Ellis MJ, Kavuri SM, Haricharan S. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response to HER2 blockade in HER2-negative breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2021 May 19;12(1):2940. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23271-0.
PMID: 34011995DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Matthew J. Ellis, MB, BChir, BSc., PhD, FRCP
- Organization
- Baylor College of Medicine
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Matthew J. Ellis, MD, PhD, FRCP
Washington University Siteman Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2005
First Posted
December 15, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
November 27, 2019
Last Updated
April 23, 2025
Results First Posted
March 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2025-04