NCT00251693

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of once-daily (QD) treatment with dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) 60 mg or 90 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
2,038

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2005

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
15 countries

140 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2005

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2005

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2007

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 23, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2012

Status Verified

February 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 8, 2005

Results QC Date

February 20, 2009

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Erosive Esophagitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (EE) by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

    Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

    8 Weeks

  • Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.

    Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

    8 Weeks

  • Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.

    8 Weeks

  • Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analyses.

    4 Weeks

  • Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method.

    4 Weeks

Study Arms (3)

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR

Lansoprazole 30 mg QD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Lansoprazole

Interventions

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.

Also known as: TAK-390MR, Kapidex, Dexilant
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Also known as: Prevacid, AG-1749
Lansoprazole 30 mg QD

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D)

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has a positive Campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) test for Helicobacter (H.) pylori.
  • Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists or sucralfate, drugs with significant anticholinergic effects, misoprostol or prokinetics
  • Use of antacids \[except for study supplied Gelusil®\]
  • Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy (blood thinners)
  • Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus
  • History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter)
  • Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition.
  • History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer.
  • Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the screening endoscopy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (140)

Unknown Facility

Alabaster, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Anaheim, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chula Vista, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fullerton, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Garden Grove, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Irvine, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lancaster, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Long Beach, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mission Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Palm Springs, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pasadena, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Redwood City, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonsville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hines, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Clive, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newton, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hollywood, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lutherville, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Troy, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mexico, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Washington, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pahrump, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Binghamton, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Great Neck, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Elkin, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Statesville, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Warren, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hermitage, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Byran, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Corsicana, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

El Paso, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ogden, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Danville, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spokane, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Monroe, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Box Hill, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

South Brisbane, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Prague, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Dietzenback, Hesse, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Schweim, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Borna, Saxony, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Gyula, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Gujarat, Ahmedabad, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Tamilnadu, Chennai, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Rajasthan, Jaipur, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Madurai, Tamina, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Chennai, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Coimbatore, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Hyderabad, India

Location

Unknown Facility

New Delhi, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Visakhapatnam, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Riga, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kaunas, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamilton, New Zealand

Location

Unknown Facility

Lima, Peru

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lubin, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Sopot, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warzawa, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bratislava, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Nitra, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Sučany, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tmava, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Gauteng, Johannesburg, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Cape Town, WC, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Panorama, WC, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Pinelands, WC, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Plumstead, WC, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Somerset West, WC, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Pretoria, South Africa

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Perez MC, Pilmer BL, Lee M, Atkinson SN, Peura D. Clinical trials: healing of erosive oesophagitis with dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed-release formulation--results from two randomized controlled studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr 1;29(7):731-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03933.x.

  • Peura DA, Metz DC, Dabholkar AH, Paris MM, Yu P, Atkinson SN. Safety profile of dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed release formulation: global clinical trial experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1010-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04137.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.

  • Wyrwich KW, Mody R, Larsen LM, Lee M, Harnam N, Revicki DA. Validation of the PAGI-SYM and PAGI-QOL among healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis clinical trial participants. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):551-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9620-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27.

  • Friedlander EA, Pallentino J, Miller SK, VanBeuge SS. The evolution of proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Dec;22(12):674-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00578.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

  • Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. Distinguishing the impact of dexlansoprazole on heartburn vs. regurgitation in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov;38(10):1303-11. doi: 10.1111/apt.12504. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

  • Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. The effects of increasing body mass index on heartburn severity, frequency and response to treatment with dexlansoprazole or lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;37(8):810-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12270. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophagitis, Peptic

Interventions

DexlansoprazoleLansoprazole

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EsophagitisEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGastroenteritisPeptic UlcerDuodenal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesStomach Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesSulfoxidesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzimidazolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sr. VP Clinical Sciences
Organization
Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Takeda

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2005

First Posted

November 10, 2005

Study Start

December 1, 2005

Primary Completion

January 1, 2007

Study Completion

January 1, 2007

Last Updated

February 3, 2012

Results First Posted

March 23, 2009

Record last verified: 2012-02

Locations