Comparison of Dexlansoprazole MR to Placebo on the Ability to Maintain Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) Compared to Placebo in Maintenance of Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
451
1 country
100
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified-release (MR) 60 mg and 90 mg and placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
100 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2006
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2009
CompletedFebruary 3, 2012
February 1, 2012
10 months
November 15, 2005
February 20, 2009
February 1, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.
Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.
6 months
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method
Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
6 months
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALDexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or T-EE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study
- Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study.
- Subjects using drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study.
- Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (100)
Unknown Facility
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Hueytown, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Tallassee, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Azusa, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Carmichael, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Cypress, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Fresno, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Modesto, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Newport Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Oakland, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Maria, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Littleton, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Longmont, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Newark, Delaware, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Naples, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Ocala, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Port Orange, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Zephyrhills, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Champaign, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Moline, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
North Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Oak Forest, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Newburgh, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Davenport, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Jefferson City, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Missoula, Montana, United States
Unknown Facility
Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Unknown Facility
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
High Point, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Bismarck, North Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Mogadore, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Medford, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Amarillo, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Conroe, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Odessa, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Pharr, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Seguin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Temple, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Lakewood, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Related Publications (1)
Howden CW, Larsen LM, Perez MC, Palmer R, Atkinson SN. Clinical trial: efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR 60 and 90 mg in healed erosive oesophagitis - maintenance of healing and symptom relief. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1;30(9):895-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04119.x. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
PMID: 19681809RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. VP Clinical Sciences
- Organization
- Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Medical Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2005
First Posted
November 17, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2006
Study Completion
November 1, 2006
Last Updated
February 3, 2012
Results First Posted
August 28, 2009
Record last verified: 2012-02