NCT00255151

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified-release (MR) 60 mg and 90 mg and placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
451

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2006

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

100 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 17, 2005

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2006

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2006

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2006

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 28, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2012

Status Verified

February 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

November 15, 2005

Results QC Date

February 20, 2009

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Erosive Esophagitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.

    Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.

    6 months

  • Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method

    Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.

    6 months

  • Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.

    6 months

  • Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.

    6 months

  • Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.

    6 months

Study Arms (3)

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR

Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.

Also known as: TAK-390MR, Dexilant, Kapidex
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD

Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or T-EE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion.

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study
  • Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study.
  • Subjects using drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study.
  • Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (100)

Unknown Facility

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hueytown, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tallassee, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Azusa, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carmichael, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cypress, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fresno, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Modesto, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newport Beach, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oakland, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orange, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Maria, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newark, Delaware, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Naples, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Smyrna Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ocala, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Moline, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oak Forest, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newburgh, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Missoula, Montana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Akron, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mogadore, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Medford, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Conroe, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Odessa, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pharr, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Seguin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Temple, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lakewood, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Howden CW, Larsen LM, Perez MC, Palmer R, Atkinson SN. Clinical trial: efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR 60 and 90 mg in healed erosive oesophagitis - maintenance of healing and symptom relief. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1;30(9):895-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04119.x. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophagitis, Peptic

Interventions

DexlansoprazoleLansoprazole

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EsophagitisEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGastroenteritisPeptic UlcerDuodenal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesStomach Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesSulfoxidesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzimidazolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Sr. VP Clinical Sciences
Organization
Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Takeda

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2005

First Posted

November 17, 2005

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion

November 1, 2006

Study Completion

November 1, 2006

Last Updated

February 3, 2012

Results First Posted

August 28, 2009

Record last verified: 2012-02

Locations