Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR on Maintaining Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) Compared to Placebo in Maintenance of Healing in Subjects With Healed Erosive Esophagitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
451
1 country
96
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of once-daily (QD) treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified-release (MR) 60 mg and 90 mg and placebo in maintaining healing of erosive esophagitis (EE).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
96 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2006
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2009
CompletedFebruary 3, 2012
February 1, 2012
10 months
November 15, 2005
February 20, 2009
February 1, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis.
Crude rates analyzed maintenance of healed EE from baseline of this study and considered prematurely discontinued subjects as relapsed.
6 months
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method
Percentage of subjects who maintained complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy. In the life table method, subjects without post-baseline endoscopy were included as censored; subjects who did not have a recurrence of EE and did not complete the study were also considered censored.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
6 months
Percentage of Days Without Daytime or Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Median.
6 months
Percentage of Days Without Nighttime Heartburn as Assessed by Daily Diary-Mean.
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALDexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to six months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must have successfully completed the Phase 3 Study T-EE04-084 (NCT00251693) or TEE04-085 (NCT00251719); and have healed esophageal erosions proven by endoscopy. Complete healing was assessed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed (defined as anything less than the criterion for Grade A). The subject was counted as healed if endoscopy findings did not meet the Grade A criterion.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of prescription or nonprescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists, sucralfate, misoprostol, or prokinetics throughout the study
- Use of antacids (except for study supplied) throughout the study.
- Subjects using drugs with significant anticholinergic effects such as tricyclics who cannot stay on a stable dose throughout the study.
- Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (96)
Unknown Facility
Alabaster, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Anaheim, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Chula Vista, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Fullerton, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Garden Grove, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Irvine, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Lancaster, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Mission Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Springs, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Redwood City, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Luis Obispo, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Waterbury, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jupiter, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Kissimmee, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Unknown Facility
Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Hines, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Oak Park, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Rockford, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Clive, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Dubuque, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Newton, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Topeka, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Hollywood, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Lutherville, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Troy, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Chaska, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Mexico, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Pahrump, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Bingampton, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Great Neck, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Elkin, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Statesville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Warren, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Hermitage, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Beaumont, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bedford, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bryan, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Corsicana, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
El Paso, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bountiful, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Ogden, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
West Jordan, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Chesapeake, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Danville, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Monroe, Wisconsin, United States
Related Publications (3)
Howden CW, Larsen LM, Perez MC, Palmer R, Atkinson SN. Clinical trial: efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR 60 and 90 mg in healed erosive oesophagitis - maintenance of healing and symptom relief. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1;30(9):895-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04119.x. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
PMID: 19681809RESULTPeura DA, Metz DC, Dabholkar AH, Paris MM, Yu P, Atkinson SN. Safety profile of dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed release formulation: global clinical trial experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1010-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04137.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
PMID: 19735233RESULTWyrwich KW, Mody R, Larsen LM, Lee M, Harnam N, Revicki DA. Validation of the PAGI-SYM and PAGI-QOL among healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis clinical trial participants. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):551-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9620-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27.
PMID: 20195905RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sr. VP Clinical Sciences
- Organization
- Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2005
First Posted
November 17, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2006
Study Completion
November 1, 2006
Last Updated
February 3, 2012
Results First Posted
August 28, 2009
Record last verified: 2012-02