NCT00251147

Brief Summary

This study compares standard open rotator cuff repair versus arthroscopic mini-open rotator cuff repair by measuring the disease-specific quality of life at 2 years in patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears. Hypothesis: There is no difference in disease-specific quality of life outcome at two years between open versus arthroscopic mini-open repair for patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
73

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 1999

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 1999

Completed
6.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2005

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2005

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 7, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2005

Completed
Last Updated

January 17, 2008

Status Verified

January 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

6.6 years

First QC Date

November 7, 2005

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

rotator cuffopenarthroscopicmini-openacromioplastyquality of lifeshoulder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Questionnaire (RC-QOL)

    Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score

    Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

  • Shoulder Rating Questionnaire

    Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

  • Functional Shoulder Elevation Test

    Baseline, 6, 12, 24 months

  • Range of motion

    Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

  • Strength

    Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

Study Arms (2)

Open Repair

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Open acromioplasty with rotator cuff repair

Mini-open Repair

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open repair

Interventions

A standard vertical incision was made over the anterolateral aspect of the acromion. The deltoid muscle was split and stripped off the anterior aspect of the acromion. The anterior and inferior aspect of the acromion was removed. The coracoacromial ligament was excised. Repair of the tear in the cuff tendon(s) was accomplished by suturing leading edge of the tear into the greater tuberosity of the humerus at or near the original site of insertion of the cuff to bone. Trans-osseous sutures, suture anchors and tendon to tendon suture repair techniques were employed for a secure repair with the arm at the side. The surgeon was allowed to use whatever method(s) to create a secure repair. The deltoid was securely reattached to the acromion with the deltoid fascia repaired down the split.

Also known as: Open repair
Open Repair

A standard arthroscopic gleno-humeral arthroscopy was performed followed by an arthroscopic acromioplasty. Three standard arthroscopic portals were used. The lateral portal was centered in line with the cuff tear, and incorporated into the mini-open incision. Initially, a partial bursectomy was performed to improve visualization. The inferior surface of the anterior acromion and the coracoacromial ligament were removed. Following the arthroscopic acromioplasty, a 3-4cm lateral incision was performed in the area of the lateral portal. The deltoid muscle was split longitudinally to expose the tear in the rotator cuff. The tear was repaired in a similar manner to the open repair with tendon to tendon sutures, trans-osseous sutures and with suture anchors.

Also known as: Mini-open repair, Scope mini-open
Mini-open Repair

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with unremitting pain in the affected shoulder who have failed conservative treatment for at least 3 months
  • Weakness of rotator cuff (MRC grades 4-, 4 or 4+)
  • Positive diagnostic imaging on the affected shoulder indicating a full-thickness rotator cuff tear which may include arthrogram, ultrasound or MRI
  • Age \> 18 years
  • English speaking

You may not qualify if:

  • A massive rotator cuff tear as demonstrated by Grade 3 or less muscle strength on testing internal and external rotation of the affected shoulder
  • Previous surgery to the affected shoulder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre

Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada

Location

Royal Columbian Hospital

New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W7, Canada

Location

Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Centre

London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada

Location

Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 1H1, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Robert Hollinshead, MD, FRCSC

    University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nicholas Mohtadi, MD, FRCSC

    University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2005

First Posted

November 9, 2005

Study Start

March 1, 1999

Primary Completion

October 1, 2005

Study Completion

October 1, 2005

Last Updated

January 17, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-01

Locations