A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Open to Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears.
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Open Acromioplasty and Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Arthroscopic Acromioplasty and Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair.
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This study compares standard open rotator cuff repair versus arthroscopic mini-open rotator cuff repair by measuring the disease-specific quality of life at 2 years in patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears. Hypothesis: There is no difference in disease-specific quality of life outcome at two years between open versus arthroscopic mini-open repair for patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 1999
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2005
CompletedJanuary 17, 2008
January 1, 2008
6.6 years
November 7, 2005
January 14, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Questionnaire (RC-QOL)
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Shoulder Rating Questionnaire
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Functional Shoulder Elevation Test
Baseline, 6, 12, 24 months
Range of motion
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Strength
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 months
Study Arms (2)
Open Repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORMini-open Repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
A standard vertical incision was made over the anterolateral aspect of the acromion. The deltoid muscle was split and stripped off the anterior aspect of the acromion. The anterior and inferior aspect of the acromion was removed. The coracoacromial ligament was excised. Repair of the tear in the cuff tendon(s) was accomplished by suturing leading edge of the tear into the greater tuberosity of the humerus at or near the original site of insertion of the cuff to bone. Trans-osseous sutures, suture anchors and tendon to tendon suture repair techniques were employed for a secure repair with the arm at the side. The surgeon was allowed to use whatever method(s) to create a secure repair. The deltoid was securely reattached to the acromion with the deltoid fascia repaired down the split.
A standard arthroscopic gleno-humeral arthroscopy was performed followed by an arthroscopic acromioplasty. Three standard arthroscopic portals were used. The lateral portal was centered in line with the cuff tear, and incorporated into the mini-open incision. Initially, a partial bursectomy was performed to improve visualization. The inferior surface of the anterior acromion and the coracoacromial ligament were removed. Following the arthroscopic acromioplasty, a 3-4cm lateral incision was performed in the area of the lateral portal. The deltoid muscle was split longitudinally to expose the tear in the rotator cuff. The tear was repaired in a similar manner to the open repair with tendon to tendon sutures, trans-osseous sutures and with suture anchors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with unremitting pain in the affected shoulder who have failed conservative treatment for at least 3 months
- Weakness of rotator cuff (MRC grades 4-, 4 or 4+)
- Positive diagnostic imaging on the affected shoulder indicating a full-thickness rotator cuff tear which may include arthrogram, ultrasound or MRI
- Age \> 18 years
- English speaking
You may not qualify if:
- A massive rotator cuff tear as demonstrated by Grade 3 or less muscle strength on testing internal and external rotation of the affected shoulder
- Previous surgery to the affected shoulder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Calgarylead
- Workers' Compensation Board, Albertacollaborator
- Canadian Orthopaedic Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W7, Canada
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 1H1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Hollinshead, MD, FRCSC
University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicholas Mohtadi, MD, FRCSC
University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2005
First Posted
November 9, 2005
Study Start
March 1, 1999
Primary Completion
October 1, 2005
Study Completion
October 1, 2005
Last Updated
January 17, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-01