Operative Versus Non-operative Management of Rotator Cuff Tear
The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Operative and Non-operative Management of Rotator Cuff Tear
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study aims at determining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears compared to conservative treatment. The research setting is prospective, randomised, and controlled. The aim of the study is to search out evidence based data of indications for rotator cuff repair. The investigators also aim at offering patients the most efficient and effective treatment and reduce the number of operations that do not have sufficient effectiveness. The data obtained will facilitate developing guidelines for referrals to a specialist when rotator cuff tear is suspected. The investigators hypothesize that there are subgroups of patients suffering from rotator cuff tears that benefit from surgery whereas other subgroups are best treated conservatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
ExpectedAugust 22, 2024
August 1, 2024
8.6 years
March 17, 2008
August 21, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
VAS (0 to 100 mm), Constant score (0 to 100 points)
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
3 months
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
6 months
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
12 months
Change in pain (VAS) and objective shoulder function (Constant score)
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Rotator cuff repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgery following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment
Conservative treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhysiotherapy according to a standardized protocol following a 3 months period of active non-operative treatment
Interventions
Rotator cuff repair + physical therapy according to a standardized protocol
Physiotherapy according to a standardized protocol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age over 35 years old
- duration of symptoms at least three months despite of non-operative treatment
- the patient accepts both treatment options (operative and conservative)
- a full-thickness rotator cuff tear in MRI arthrography
You may not qualify if:
- previous shoulder operations
- too high risk for operation
- any disease or social problem reducing the ability to co-operate
- rheumatoid arthritis
- severe arthrosis of the glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint
- irreparable rotator cuff tear (including rotator cuff tear arthropathy)
- progressive malign disease
- adhesive capsulitis
- high-energy trauma before symptoms
- cervical syndrome
- shoulder instability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Central Finland Hospital Districtlead
- Academy of Finlandcollaborator
- Oulu University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
Central Finland Hospital
Jyväskylä, FIN-40620, Finland
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Finland
Related Publications (9)
Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, Levy BA, Marx RG. Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:52-63. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802fc175.
PMID: 17179786BACKGROUNDKukkonen J, Joukainen A, Lehtinen J, Mattila KT, Tuominen EK, Kauko T, Aarimaa V. Treatment of Nontraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Two Years of Clinical and Imaging Follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 4;97(21):1729-37. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01051.
PMID: 26537160BACKGROUNDKukkonen J, Joukainen A, Lehtinen J, Mattila KT, Tuominen EK, Kauko T, Aarimaa V. Treatment of non-traumatic rotator cuff tears: A randomised controlled trial with one-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jan;96-B(1):75-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.32168.
PMID: 24395315BACKGROUNDLambers Heerspink FO, van Raay JJ, Koorevaar RC, van Eerden PJ, Westerbeek RE, van 't Riet E, van den Akker-Scheek I, Diercks RL. Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.040.
PMID: 26189808BACKGROUNDMoosmayer S, Lund G, Seljom US, Haldorsen B, Svege IC, Hennig T, Pripp AH, Smith HJ. Tendon repair compared with physiotherapy in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled study in 103 cases with a five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 17;96(18):1504-14. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01393.
PMID: 25232074BACKGROUNDMoosmayer S, Lund G, Seljom U, Svege I, Hennig T, Tariq R, Smith HJ. Comparison between surgery and physiotherapy in the treatment of small and medium-sized tears of the rotator cuff: A randomised controlled study of 103 patients with one-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jan;92(1):83-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22609.
PMID: 20044684BACKGROUNDPaloneva J, Lepola V, Aarimaa V, Joukainen A, Ylinen J, Mattila VM. Increasing incidence of rotator cuff repairs--A nationwide registry study in Finland. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Aug 12;16:189. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0639-6.
PMID: 26265152BACKGROUNDPaloneva J, Lepola V, Karppinen J, Ylinen J, Aarimaa V, Mattila VM. Declining incidence of acromioplasty in Finland. Acta Orthop. 2015 Apr;86(2):220-4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.977703. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
PMID: 25340548BACKGROUNDCederqvist S, Flinkkila T, Sormaala M, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Irmola T, Lehtokangas H, Liukkonen J, Pamilo K, Ridanpaa T, Sirnio K, Leppilahti J, Kiviranta I, Paloneva J. Non-surgical and surgical treatments for rotator cuff disease: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial with 2-year follow-up after initial rehabilitation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):796-802. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219099. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
PMID: 33272959DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juha Paloneva, MD, PhD
Central Finland Health Care District, University of Eastern Finland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Md, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2008
First Posted
June 12, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
August 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08