NCT01458665

Brief Summary

  • The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and anatomical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and conventional rotator cuff repair in treatment of medium to large rotator cuff tears.
  • PRP application to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair would accelerate recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in terms of pain relief, functional outcomes, overall satisfaction, and enhance structural integrity of repaired tendon.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2011

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2011

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2014

Status Verified

June 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2011

Last Update Submit

June 16, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Constant-Murley shoulder score

    The Constant score assesses pain, function, ROM, and strength. Pain is allotted a maximum of 15 points, activities of daily living (function)20 points, ROM 40 points, and strength 25 points. The component scores are summated to achieve a maximum possible total score of 100.

    Postoperative 3months

Study Arms (2)

PRP group

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with PRP

Conventional group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Procedure: Conventional arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Interventions

* Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lazy lateral decubitus position on the operating table. * The surgical area was prepared and draped with Betadine. * Small stab incisions were made in the creation of 4-5 portals as needed. * A scope was explored via the arthroscopic portal into the GH joint \& subacromial space. * Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tear was done with suture anchors. * The skin was closed with Nylon or medical staples. * Sterile dressing was applied on surgical wound.

Conventional group

* Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lazy lateral decubitus position on the operating table. * The surgical area was prepared and draped with Betadine. * Small stab incisions were made in the creation of 4-5 portals as needed. * A scope was explored via the arthroscopic portal into the GH joint \& subacromial space. * Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tear was done with suture anchors. * After tying sutures of the medial row, PRP gels were applied on the repair site. * The lateral row was secured using suture anchors. * The skin was closed with Nylon or medical staples. * Sterile dressing was applied on surgical wound.

PRP group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • medium to large rotator cuff tear as a determined by clinical examination and MR prior to surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • previous history of shoulder surgery
  • acute trauma
  • chronic dislocation
  • pyogenic infection
  • rotator cuff arthropathy with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and superior migration of the humeral head
  • showed abnormal serological test results
  • thrombocytopenia (platelets less than 15000 per microliter)
  • had been received anti-platelet medication
  • psychiatric problems that precludes informed consent or inability to read or write
  • other serious problems that preclude participation of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Joint & Spine Center, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine

Seoul, 156-707, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Chris H. Jo, M.D., Ph.D

    Joint & Spine Center, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2011

First Posted

October 25, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 18, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-06

Locations