NCT01238302

Brief Summary

  • The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and anatomical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with Platelet-Rich Plasma(PRP) and conventional rotator cuff repair in treatment of large to massive rotator cuff tears.
  • PRP application to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair would accelerate recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in terms of pain relief, functional outcomes, overall satisfaction, and enhance structural integrity of repaired tendon.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2009

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2010

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

February 27, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

November 8, 2010

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • structural integrity of repaired rotator cuff tendon

    To evaluate structural outcomes, magnetic resonance(MR)imaging or computed tomography arthrography were used at minimum postoperative 9months. The structural integrity was evaluated using Sugaya's method; * type I, sufficient thickness with homogenously low intensity * type II, insufficient thickness partial high intensity * type III, insufficient thickness without discontinuity (thinned cuff) * type IV, presence of minor discontinuity * type V, presence of a major discontinuity Type I, II, and III were considered as healed, while type IV, and V were considered as retear.

    postoperative 9months

Study Arms (2)

Conventional group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Procedure: Conventional arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

PRP group

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with PRP

Interventions

* Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lazy lateral decubitus position on the operating table. * The surgical area was prepared and draped with Betadine. * Small stab incisions were made in the creation of 4-5 portals as needed. * A scope was explored via the arthroscopic portal into the GH joint \& subacromial space. * Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tear was done with suture anchors. * The skin was closed with Nylon or medical staples. * Sterile dressing was applied on surgical wound.

Conventional group

* Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lazy lateral decubitus position on the operating table. * The surgical area was prepared and draped with Betadine. * Small stab incisions were made in the creation of 4-5 portals as needed. * A scope was explored via the arthroscopic portal into the GH joint \& subacromial space. * Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tear was done with suture anchors. * After tying sutures of the medial row, PRP gels were applied on the repair site. * The lateral row was secured using suture anchors. * The skin was closed with Nylon or medical staples. * Sterile dressing was applied on surgical wound.

PRP group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • large to massive rotator cuff tear as a determined by clinical examination and MR prior to surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • previous history of shoulder surgery
  • acute trauma
  • chronic dislocation
  • pyogenic infection
  • rotator cuff arthropathy with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and superior migration of the humeral head
  • showed abnormal serological test results
  • thrombocytopenia (platelets less than 15000 per microliter)
  • had been received anti-platelet medication
  • psychiatric problems that precludes informed consent or inability to read or write
  • other serious problems that preclude participation of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Joint & Spine Center, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine

Seoul, 156-707, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Officials

  • Chris Hyunchul Jo, M.D., Ph.D

    Joint & Spine Center, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2010

First Posted

November 10, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion

October 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Locations