Arthroscopic Surgery and Platelet Rich Plasma In Rotator Cuff Tear Evaluation
ASPIRE
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Rotator cuff tears are a common injury that lead to pain and loss of function for those who suffer from it. Treatment includes the use of arthroscopic surgery to return function to the patient and reduce their pain. This study is interested in a technique that has the potential to improve patient outcomes in terms of less pain and better function after their surgery. Autologous Conditioned Plasma (ACP) or Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is the intervention of interest, which is simply the patient's own blood that is withdrawn and spun down to obtain a high concentration of cells called platelets. Platelets release growth factors important for healing, as well as fibrin, which acts like a biological glue. The PRP is then re-injected into the shoulder at the time of surgery and again at 4 weeks. It has been shown to accelerate healing in other studies for injuries such as chronic elbow tendinopathy, but there is no randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of PRP in rotator cuff tears. It is on this basis that the study is being performed. Participating patients will receive either a PRP injection or a placebo (normal saline) and the effects will be compared at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks based on a pain score and return to function questionnaires. The primary hypothesis for this study is that ACP compared with placebo is effective in reducing pain at the site of a rotator cuff injury that has undergone arthroscopic repair. It is expected that ACP administered during surgery and 4 weeks post-surgery will reduce 6-week pain scores compared to the placebo group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedNovember 1, 2012
October 1, 2012
1.9 years
July 22, 2010
October 31, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score
To investigate the effect of ACP compared to placebo on pain scores in rotator cuff tears undergoing arthroscopic repair at 6 weeks. Pain severity will be measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Subjects will be asked to rate their worst pain in their shoulder for the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm vertical scale with "0" indicating no pain at all and "100" indicating the worst pain the subject can imagine.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Physical function
Up to and including 6 weeks
Revision surgery
Up to and including 6 weeks
Health utility
Up to and including 6 weeks
Adverse events
Up to and including 6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Autologous conditioned plasma
ACTIVE COMPARATORNormal saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
ACP is not a drug as the patient's own blood plasma is re-injected into the surgical site.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women who are between 18 and 70 years of age.
- Primary, traumatic or degenerative rotator cuff tears measuring 3 cm or less.
- Rotator cuff tears requiring arthroscopic repair within 18 months of initial diagnosis.
- Provision of informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Rotator cuff tears secondary to a fracture.
- Patients with an associated dislocation at the time of randomization.
- Rotator cuff tears that underwent prior surgical repair or revision arthroscopy.
- Non-surgical rotator cuff associated treatment in the 1 month prior to randomization including corticosteroid injection and anti-inflammatory treatment.
- Prior platelet rich plasma injection.
- Pre-existing conditions associated with upper extremity pain, including arthritis, ongoing infection, carpal tunnel syndrome, cervical neuropathy or other nerve pathology, local malignancy, and systemic disorders (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, hypothyroidism).
- Patients with gross shoulder instability.
- Patients with an active infection.
- Patients who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next 12 months.
- Patients with a pre-operative platelet count less than 125,000 and a pre-operative hemoglobin of 7.5g/dl or less.
- Likely problems with follow-up (i.e. patients with no fixed address, report a plan to move out of town, or intellectually challenged patients without adequate family support).
- Patients who do not read and speak English.
- Patients participating in another ongoing trial that would interfere with the assessment of the primary or secondary outcomes.
- Any other reason (in the judgment of the surgeon).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McMaster Universitylead
- Arthrex, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (3)
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L8E7, Canada
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
McMaster Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Related Publications (3)
Lopez-Vidriero E, Goulding KA, Simon DA, Sanchez M, Johnson DH. The use of platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopy and sports medicine: optimizing the healing environment. Arthroscopy. 2010 Feb;26(2):269-78. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.11.015.
PMID: 20141991BACKGROUNDRandelli PS, Arrigoni P, Cabitza P, Volpi P, Maffulli N. Autologous platelet rich plasma for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(20-22):1584-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280801906081.
PMID: 18608363BACKGROUNDde Vos RJ, Weir A, van Schie HT, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Tol JL. Platelet-rich plasma injection for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):144-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1986.
PMID: 20068208BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohit Bhandari, MD, MSc, PhD, FRCSC
McMaster University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2010
First Posted
July 27, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 1, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10