Cognitive Rehabilitation in Schizophrenia
The Effects of Cognitive Rehabilitation on Function in Schizophrenia
2 other identifiers
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study will investigate the viability of two cognitive rehabilitation strategies to improve functional outcomes for people with schizophrenia. Many people with schizophrenia experience impairments in cognitive function which limit their abilities. These impairments have been shown to precede the onset of illness and represent a vulnerability factor which is exacerbated by emerging psychotic symptoms. These impairments affect a range of functional domains including symptom severity, work function, symptom management, treatment, and overall quality of life. Recognizing the link between cognitive impairment and function, a few clinicals and researchers have attempted to remediate cognitive impairments by providing cognitive retraining programs similar to those used in traumatic brain injured patients or adaptive skills training. Cognitive retraining involves repetitive exercises to increase elemental cognitive functions including memory, attention, psychomotor speed, planning, and cognitive flexibility. Adaptive skill training involves didactic group exercises in social skills, activities of daily living, and symptom management. Each approach has demonstrated some rehabilitation benefits. This study will investigate the effectiveness of a combination of these two approaches on outcomes in schizophrenia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 14, 2016
CompletedMay 25, 2016
April 1, 2016
4.5 years
November 2, 2005
September 2, 2015
April 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Wisconsin Card Sort Percent Perseverative Errors (Standard Score)
This is a measure of cognitive flexibility and the ability to shift set in the face of a changing reinforcement. The measure reflects "density" of perseverative errors in relation to the overall test performance. It is computed by calculating the ration of perseverative errors to trials administered and multiplied by 100. Then the percentage score is translate using the available Standard Score Tables provided in the manual and converted to a standard score with a mean of 100, a maximum of 145 and a minimum of 55, with higher Standard Scores indicating better performance.
16 weeks after intake
Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Test
21 Item audio-visual task that measures the ability to recognize affective states in others. Affective states presented include: Happiness, Sadness, Surprise, Disgust, Fear, Anger and No Emotion. The instrument is scored for total correct responses with scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicate better overall performance.
16 weeks from intake
Continuous Performance Task X/A Version
CPT relative X/A Percentage. This is a task-oriented computerized assessment of attention-related problems. This variable measures the relative sustained attention, and vigilance over the time of the task. Raw performance is standardize using available age and education norms yielding a Standardized Score with a mean of 100. Maximum Standard score is 145 and the minimum is 55 with higher scores reflect better performance.
16 weeks after intake assessment
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test- Total Recall Variable
This is measure of verbal learning and memory for immediate recall. Respondents are read a list of 12 items and asked to repeat once the last item is given. The list if given 3 times. Each time all items are recorded giving a total score ranging from 0 to 36. The score is converted to T-scores (mean of 50 and sd of 10) using the norms in the manual. The data reported are that in T-Scores with higher scores indicating better functioning.
16 weeks post intake assessment
Independent Living Skills Survey
Independent Living Skills Survey is a 103 items that assess 12 areas of skills; personal hygiene (6 items), appearance and care of clothing (12 items), care of personal possessions and living space (9 items), food preparation (9 items), care of one's own health and safety (10 items), money management (10 items), transportation (7 items), leisure and recreational activities (13 items), job seeking (6 items), job maintenance (3 items), eating behaviors (9 items), and social interactions (9 items). The items describe relatively specific skills such as "washes hair twice a week," and informants indicate how frequently an individual has performed each skill within the past month. The responses are yes (1 point) no (0 points). Scores reports are the average #of yes items/number of total items. Higher scores indicating better functioning.
16 weeks after intake
Study Arms (3)
CRT + Skills Training
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention is call Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) with a skill development group. Participants receive 15 weeks of cognitive training (with intake, 15 and 30 week assessment). This intervention is reliant upon didactic exchanges between trainer and participant, minimizing error, and behavioral modeling with the goal of developing better meta-cognitive skills. Procedures include paper and pencil activities (memory, planning and cognitive flexibility training) which are organized by difficulty. Sessions are organized to have a discussion between the trainer and the participant about the task and strategies, trainer modeling with articulation of strategy a participant attempts the task, talking aloud the steps, and finally the participant practices the task covertly. The trainer has the role of "error catcher and model." All subjects randomized to this condition also are receiving the weekly skills group (SDG)offered to participants in all experimental conditions.
ICBCR and Skills Training
EXPERIMENTALThis intervention is Individualized Computer Based Cognitive Remediation (ICBCR) and skills development group (SDG). Participants receive 15 weeks of computerized training (with intake, 15 and 30 week assessments). This intervention relies upon intense, frequent, repetition of tasks being made incrementally more challenging. Computer tasks are organized so that the initial trials are easily completed and more challenging levels are then attempted. Parameters such as duration of task, task speed, and intra-task variables all be are manipulated. A trainer will be present at each session to help set up the computer tasks and answer questions. Besides the first two sessions that will be orientation sessions, the trainer has little involvement during the training sessions. The role of the trainer is to help organize, support, and provide feedback to each participant. All subjects randomized to this condition also are receiving the weekly skills group (SDG).
Skills Group Control
EXPERIMENTALThe control intervention is call the skills development group (SDG) and is augmented with up to five individual contacts with research staff. The Skills Group (SDG) control is standard care group which will receive 15 weeks of the skills development group (SDG) similar to that offered as a clinical service at the VA Medical Center. During the 15 weeks participants will attend 1.5 hours of skills group per week. The 15 sessions will include skills training related to: a) cooking and food preparation, b) negotiating the local transportation system, c) shopping, and d) planning leisure activities. The training activities are a blend of didactic learning, modeling and finally in vivo practice. Participants in this group will also be offered up to five weekly contacts with staff to balance out factors related to meeting with staff in the other conditions.
Interventions
CRT is a one on one cognitive skills training and Skill training is a group intervention to develop concrete skills of daily living.
ICBCR is a computerized cognitive skills training program and Skill training is a group intervention to develop concrete skills of daily living.
Skill training is a group intervention to develop concrete skills of daily living. This is augmented with the opportunity to receive up to 5 hours of individual staff contact.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Between the ages of 18-65. Stable medication regime (no changes in last 30 days)Minimum of 30 days since last hospitalization. No hx of TBI
You may not qualify if:
- Current Substance abuse, no comorbid neurological disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
West Haven, Connecticut, 06516, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gary Bryson
- Organization
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary Bryson
VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2005
First Posted
November 4, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2004
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 25, 2016
Results First Posted
April 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data to be written up in peer review journal and possibly presented at regional and national conferences, but there is no plan to de-identify and share