Neurophysiological Targets for Cognitive Training in Schizophrenia
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether computer-based training of auditory and visual processing results in corresponding improvement in brain function in individuals with schizophrenia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable schizophrenia
Started Nov 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable schizophrenia
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 20, 2017
CompletedDecember 22, 2017
December 1, 2017
3.9 years
June 17, 2009
February 1, 2017
December 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Visual Target Detection (P300 Event-related Potential Amplitude) Change
Visual P300 was measured in a 3-stimulus target detection task with target stimuli (10%; large circle) presented in pseudo random order amidst a series of novel (10%; fractal), and standard (80%; small circle) images on a 24" LCD monitor at 100cm viewing distance. Subjects are instructed to press a reaction time button with the preferred hand to Targets only, giving equal importance to speed and accuracy. Primary analysis are based on Target "P300b" identified as the most positive amplitude deflection within the window of 250-550ms post stimulus at posterior midline electrode Pz. The P300b component is thought to reflect cognitive processes involved in memory updating and decision making. P300 reported as difference scores from baseline with negative values indicating increased P300.
Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks
Auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Amplitude Change
Auditory MMN is a fronto-central, mid-latency, potential generated by the auditory cortex in response to deviation in a repetitive stimulus sequence. MMN was assessed using a 3-deviant paradigm in which a series of standard tones (633 Hz, 50ms duration,90%) is interrupted by deviants (10%) that differ either by (1) pitch (1000Hz, 50ms), (2) duration (633 Hz, 100ms), or (3) both (1000Hz, 100ms). MMN was tested concurrently with Visual P300 using a combined task in which subjects were instructed to ignore the auditory stimuli and focus on the visual stimuli. MMN is scored by subtracting each deviant ERP waveform from the standard waveform and measuring the most negative deflection in a window of 50 to 265ms post-stimulus from the resulting difference wave. Primary analysis is based on the combined deviant condition scored at the frontal midline (Fz) electrode site. MMN reported as difference scores from baseline with positive values indicating increased MMN.
Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks
MCCB Cognitive Composite Score Change
The Cognitive Composite score is derived from the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The MCCB consists of 10 tests and provides standard scores for each according to seven cognitive domains: (1) speed of processing, (2) attention/vigilance, (3) working memory (verbal and visual), (4) verbal learning, (5) visual learning, (6) reasoning and problem solving, and (7) social cognition. The primary dependent measures derived from the MCCB for purpose of this study is the cognitive composite score, computed as the average of standard (t-scores) scores from each domain excluding social cognition. MCCB Composite reported as difference scores from baseline with negative values indicating higher test performance.
Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Visual Learning (BVMT-R) Change
Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks
Verbal Learning (HVLT-R) Change
Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks
Visual Working Memory (Spatial Span) Change
Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks
Auditory Working Memory (LNS) Change
Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Auditory-Visual Train Order
EXPERIMENTAL4 weeks (20 sessions) of auditory cognitive training (Brain Fitness) followed by 4 weeks (20 sessions) of visual cognitive training (Insight)
Visual-Auditory Train Order
EXPERIMENTAL4 weeks (20 sessions) of visual cognitive training (Insight) followed by 4 weeks (20 sessions) of auditory cognitive training (Brain Fitness)
Interventions
The program entails six computer-based exercises that are designed to be very easy to use and require no computer experience. The exercises are calibrated to individual performance at the onset of training and adapt in difficulty to individual performance, giving constant feedback about progress. Each of the six exercises focuses on a distinct process: (1) auditory processing speed, (2) discriminating sounds, (3) sound precision, (4) sound sequencing, (5) working memory, and (6) narrative memory. Training was administered in a supervised clinical laboratory setting at a frequency of five 60-minute sessions per week over 4 weeks.
The program entails five computer-based exercises that are designed to be very easy to use and require no computer experience. The exercises are calibrated to individual performance at the onset of training and, following our laboratory procedures, calibration testing is repeated every 5th session. Exercises adapt in difficulty to individual performance, giving constant feedback about progress. Each of the five exercises focuses on a distinct process: (1) visual precision, (2) visual processing speed, (3) divided attention, (4) visual working memory, and (5) useful field of view. Training was administered in a supervised clinical laboratory setting at a frequency of five 40-minute sessions per week over 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
- Age between 18 \& 70
- minimum of 30 days since discharge from last hospitalization
- minimum of 30 days since last change in psychiatric medications
- receiving mental health services
- no housing changes in the past 30 days
You may not qualify if:
- current diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse
- history of brain trauma or neurological disease
- chart diagnosis of mental retardation or premorbid intelligence \< 70 based on Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) full-scale estimated IQ
- auditory or visual impairment that would interfere with study procedures
- a sample of 20 healthy community volunteers was also recruited according to these criteria and tested, without intervention, as a normative reference sample for MMN and P300 measures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
West Haven, Connecticut, 06516, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Jason K. Johannesen
- Organization
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jason K Johannesen, PhD
VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2009
First Posted
June 18, 2009
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 22, 2017
Results First Posted
December 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share