NCT00923078

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether computer-based training of auditory and visual processing results in corresponding improvement in brain function in individuals with schizophrenia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable schizophrenia

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Typical duration for not_applicable schizophrenia

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2009

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2014

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 20, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2009

Results QC Date

February 1, 2017

Last Update Submit

December 21, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

schizophreniacognitive remediationrehabilitationelectrophysiologyneuropsychology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Visual Target Detection (P300 Event-related Potential Amplitude) Change

    Visual P300 was measured in a 3-stimulus target detection task with target stimuli (10%; large circle) presented in pseudo random order amidst a series of novel (10%; fractal), and standard (80%; small circle) images on a 24" LCD monitor at 100cm viewing distance. Subjects are instructed to press a reaction time button with the preferred hand to Targets only, giving equal importance to speed and accuracy. Primary analysis are based on Target "P300b" identified as the most positive amplitude deflection within the window of 250-550ms post stimulus at posterior midline electrode Pz. The P300b component is thought to reflect cognitive processes involved in memory updating and decision making. P300 reported as difference scores from baseline with negative values indicating increased P300.

    Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks

  • Auditory Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Amplitude Change

    Auditory MMN is a fronto-central, mid-latency, potential generated by the auditory cortex in response to deviation in a repetitive stimulus sequence. MMN was assessed using a 3-deviant paradigm in which a series of standard tones (633 Hz, 50ms duration,90%) is interrupted by deviants (10%) that differ either by (1) pitch (1000Hz, 50ms), (2) duration (633 Hz, 100ms), or (3) both (1000Hz, 100ms). MMN was tested concurrently with Visual P300 using a combined task in which subjects were instructed to ignore the auditory stimuli and focus on the visual stimuli. MMN is scored by subtracting each deviant ERP waveform from the standard waveform and measuring the most negative deflection in a window of 50 to 265ms post-stimulus from the resulting difference wave. Primary analysis is based on the combined deviant condition scored at the frontal midline (Fz) electrode site. MMN reported as difference scores from baseline with positive values indicating increased MMN.

    Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks

  • MCCB Cognitive Composite Score Change

    The Cognitive Composite score is derived from the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The MCCB consists of 10 tests and provides standard scores for each according to seven cognitive domains: (1) speed of processing, (2) attention/vigilance, (3) working memory (verbal and visual), (4) verbal learning, (5) visual learning, (6) reasoning and problem solving, and (7) social cognition. The primary dependent measures derived from the MCCB for purpose of this study is the cognitive composite score, computed as the average of standard (t-scores) scores from each domain excluding social cognition. MCCB Composite reported as difference scores from baseline with negative values indicating higher test performance.

    Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Visual Learning (BVMT-R) Change

    Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks

  • Verbal Learning (HVLT-R) Change

    Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks

  • Visual Working Memory (Spatial Span) Change

    Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks

  • Auditory Working Memory (LNS) Change

    Baseline; Post 4 weeks (treatment crossover); Post 8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Auditory-Visual Train Order

EXPERIMENTAL

4 weeks (20 sessions) of auditory cognitive training (Brain Fitness) followed by 4 weeks (20 sessions) of visual cognitive training (Insight)

Behavioral: Auditory Cognitive TrainingBehavioral: Visual Cognitive Training

Visual-Auditory Train Order

EXPERIMENTAL

4 weeks (20 sessions) of visual cognitive training (Insight) followed by 4 weeks (20 sessions) of auditory cognitive training (Brain Fitness)

Behavioral: Auditory Cognitive TrainingBehavioral: Visual Cognitive Training

Interventions

The program entails six computer-based exercises that are designed to be very easy to use and require no computer experience. The exercises are calibrated to individual performance at the onset of training and adapt in difficulty to individual performance, giving constant feedback about progress. Each of the six exercises focuses on a distinct process: (1) auditory processing speed, (2) discriminating sounds, (3) sound precision, (4) sound sequencing, (5) working memory, and (6) narrative memory. Training was administered in a supervised clinical laboratory setting at a frequency of five 60-minute sessions per week over 4 weeks.

Also known as: Brain Fitness by Posit Science
Auditory-Visual Train OrderVisual-Auditory Train Order

The program entails five computer-based exercises that are designed to be very easy to use and require no computer experience. The exercises are calibrated to individual performance at the onset of training and, following our laboratory procedures, calibration testing is repeated every 5th session. Exercises adapt in difficulty to individual performance, giving constant feedback about progress. Each of the five exercises focuses on a distinct process: (1) visual precision, (2) visual processing speed, (3) divided attention, (4) visual working memory, and (5) useful field of view. Training was administered in a supervised clinical laboratory setting at a frequency of five 40-minute sessions per week over 4 weeks.

Also known as: Cortex with Insight by Posit Science
Auditory-Visual Train OrderVisual-Auditory Train Order

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • Age between 18 \& 70
  • minimum of 30 days since discharge from last hospitalization
  • minimum of 30 days since last change in psychiatric medications
  • receiving mental health services
  • no housing changes in the past 30 days

You may not qualify if:

  • current diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse
  • history of brain trauma or neurological disease
  • chart diagnosis of mental retardation or premorbid intelligence \< 70 based on Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) full-scale estimated IQ
  • auditory or visual impairment that would interfere with study procedures
  • a sample of 20 healthy community volunteers was also recruited according to these criteria and tested, without intervention, as a normative reference sample for MMN and P300 measures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)

West Haven, Connecticut, 06516, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Jason K. Johannesen
Organization
VA Connecticut Healthcare System

Study Officials

  • Jason K Johannesen, PhD

    VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2009

First Posted

June 18, 2009

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

October 1, 2014

Study Completion

October 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 22, 2017

Results First Posted

December 20, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations