Study Stopped
PI left University
Screen and Treat for Cervical Cancer Prevention
SAT
Safety and Efficacy of Two Screen-and-Treat Approaches for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
7,123
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study measures the impact of "screen-and-treat" on the prevalence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer (CIN 2+). It is a three-arm, randomized clinical trial comparing two "screen-and-treat" approaches to delayed evaluation as a control. The primary outcome is biopsy-confirmed CIN 2+ at 6 months and significant complications within 6 months of randomization with continued follow-up to detect CIN2+ and other complications up to 36 months post-randomization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jan 2000
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedJuly 9, 2015
July 1, 2015
6.3 years
October 4, 2005
July 7, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of "Screen and Treat" + Cryosurgery
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Grade 2 or 3 or Cervical Cancer: To determine the reduction in prevalence of biopsy-confirmed high-grade SIL (HiSIL) when a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) or HPV DNA followed by immediate cryosurgery of screen positive women is carried out by mid-level practitioners without the use of colposcopy in a low-resource setting.
Up to 12 months from entry into the study
Secondary Outcomes (2)
HIV incidence
6 months after entry into study
Safety of Cryosurgery
Up to 12 months from entry into study
Study Arms (3)
HPV DNA Testing + Cryosurgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing HPV DNA testing of clinician-collected cervical samples, followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
VIA + Cryosurgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA), followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
Delayed Evaluation and Treatment
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will undergo a similar screening process at entry, but will be randomized to have evaluation and treatment delayed until 6 months after screening.
Interventions
Patients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing HPV DNA testing of clinician-collected cervical samples, followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
Patients will undergo a "Screen and Treat" program utilizing visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA), followed by cryosurgery of screen positive women.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has a cervix
- Never been screened for cervical cancer
- Not currently pregnant
You may not qualify if:
- Has previously had a Pap smear
- Has previously undergone treatment for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL)
- Have lesions suspicious for cancer, have large acetowhite lesions extending over 70% of the cervix or into endocervical canal, are unsuitable for cryotherapy because of severe atrophy, polyps, cervix distorted, cervix cannot be adequately visualized
- Is unable to cooperate with study procedures or tolerate the insertion of a speculum
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Columbia Universitylead
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundationcollaborator
- EngenderHealthcollaborator
- University of Cape Towncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Cape, 8001, South Africa
Related Publications (2)
Denny L, Kuhn L, De Souza M, Pollack AE, Dupree W, Wright TC Jr. Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2173-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2173.
PMID: 16264158RESULTKuhn L, Wang C, Tsai WY, Wright TC, Denny L. Efficacy of human papillomavirus-based screen-and-treat for cervical cancer prevention among HIV-infected women. AIDS. 2010 Oct 23;24(16):2553-61. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833e163e.
PMID: 20706107DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lynette Denny, MD
University of Cape Town
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas C Wright, MD
Columbia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2005
First Posted
October 6, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2000
Primary Completion
April 1, 2006
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 9, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07