Study Stopped
Study was closed because of slow accrual
Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy With or Without Hyperthermia Therapy in Treating Patients With Cervical Cancer
An International Multi Center Phase III Study of Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy Plus Hyperthermia for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
3 other identifiers
interventional
101
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Hyperthermia therapy kills tumor cells by heating them to several degrees above body temperature. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy and radiation therapy are more effective with or without hyperthermia therapy in treating cervical cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial compared the safety and efficacy of cisplatin and radiation therapy, together with hyperthermia therapy versus cisplatin and radiation therapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Mar 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 17, 2013
CompletedSeptember 17, 2013
July 1, 2013
5.7 years
June 10, 2004
April 10, 2013
July 10, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Primary Tumor Response Rate at 4-6 Weeks Post Treatment
Primary tumor response rate is the proportion of subjects achieving a best response of complete (CR) or partial (PR) responses, according to the RECIST criteria for change in sum of longest diameters.
3 months from start of therapy
Five-year Failure-free Survival
Five-year failure free survival (FFS) time was defined as the time from randomization until relapse/disease progression (local and/or distant) or death from any cause. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The 5-year FFS rate is a percentage representing the fraction of randomized patients who, after 5 years, are disease free or alive.
5 Years
Five-Year Local Recurrence-Free Survival
Five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) time was defined as the time from randomization until local progressive disease or death from any cause. Local recurrence was defined as evidence of disease progression on physical exam or radiologic study, confirmed histologically by tissue biopsy. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The 5-year LRFS rate is a percentage representing the fraction of randomized patients who, after 5 years, do not have local progression or are alive.
5 years
Five-Year Overall Survival
Five-year overall survival (OS) time was time from date of randomization until death from any cause. The 5-year OS rate is a percentage, representing the fraction of randomized patients who, after 5 years, are still alive.
5 Years
Study Arms (2)
Arm I
EXPERIMENTALPatients received cisplatin IV and concurrently underwent hyperthermia treatment over 60-90 minutes on day 1. Patients also underwent external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5. Treatment repeated weekly for 5-6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of chemoradiotherapy and hyperthermia, patients underwent brachytherapy to the cervix for 2-3 days.
Arm II
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received cisplatin and undergo external beam radiation therapy (and brachytherapy) as in arm I.
Interventions
Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Invasive cervical carcinoma (squamous, adeno or adenosquamous histologies, small cell histology excluded)
- age \>18years
- International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics ((FIGO) stage IB2, IIA-IVA, FIGO stages IA, IB1 with positive pelvic lymph nodes or parametria either on imaging techniques or pathologically involved at the time of surgery.
- patients undergoing surgical removal of the cervix and uterus are not eligible, parametria either on imaging techniques or pathologically involved at the time • Performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)/World Health Organisation (WHO) 0, 1 or \>/=70%respectively White Blood count (WBC) ≥ 3,000, platelets ≥ 100,000, Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \> 1500
- serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal, transaminase ≤ 3 times upper limit of normal calculated creatinine clearance \>60milliliters (mls)/liter ( Cockcroft) OR creatinine \</= 2.0mgs% paraaortic adenopathy absent or 1.5 centimeter (cm) in greatest dimension on Computerised Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan;
- No history of myocardial infarction in the last 6 months no symptomatic angina pectoris negative pregnancy test in patients under 50 Hemoglobin \>12.0 Gd/dl or \>7.5 mmo;/L with transfusion if needed written written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- surgical resection of the primary tumor (i.e. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)/ Bilateral salpingoophorectomy (BSO)
- patients with pacemakers or implanted defibrillators
- patients with significant metallic foreign bodies (i.e. hip replacements, bone metallic rods,orthopedic plates, etc.)
- prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mark Dewhirstlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Northwestern Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke Cancer Institute
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There are integrity issues with the currently available data, involving international institutions, in that several pieces of information relating to patient accrual and outcomes cannot be verified.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Mark Dewhirst
- Organization
- Duke University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ellen L. Jones, MD, PhD
Duke Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leonard R. Prosnitz, MD
Duke Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Dewhirst, DVM PhD
Duke Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zeljko Vujaskovic, MD PhD
Duke Cancer Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2004
First Posted
June 11, 2004
Study Start
March 1, 2003
Primary Completion
November 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 17, 2013
Results First Posted
September 17, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07