Word-Retrieval Treatment for Aphasia: Semantic Feature Analysis
Word-Retrieval for Aphasia: Facilitation of Generalization
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this investigation is to further develop and test a treatment for word-finding problems in aphasia. The treatment is designed to strengthen meaning associations within categories of words (e.g., animals, tools, fruits). The treatment is also designed to be used as a search strategy in instances of word-finding difficulty. The study was devised to evaluate the extent to which treatment increases the ability to recall trained, as well as untrained, words.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 24, 2014
CompletedDecember 24, 2014
December 1, 2014
3.6 years
July 27, 2005
November 21, 2014
December 22, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Word Retrieval Accuracy
Accuracy of naming of pictured treated and untreated items was assessed in probes conducted separate from treatment. Probes were conducted repeatedly throughout the study, from baseline (prior to treatment) to follow-up (6 weeks following treatment). All naming responses were scored using a 0-10 scale reflecting promptness and presence of errors; scores of 8-10 received an "accuate" score and scores of 0-7 received an "inaccurate" score. A percentage accuracy score was calculated for each experimental set of items for every probe session. Baseline probe scores were compared to end of treatment and follow-up probe scores to obtain individual effect sizes for each experimental list of items for each participant (i.e., several effect sizes were calculated for each participant). All effect sizes were utlized to obtain an average effect size for each participant; these averages were then utlized to obtain a group average.
End of treatment and at 6 weeks post treatment
Study Arms (2)
Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA)
EXPERIMENTALWord retrieval treatment for aphasia.
Participants for Stimuli Development
NO INTERVENTIONNon-brain-injured participants provided data for development of treatment stimuli.
Interventions
SFA entails having the speech-language pathologist (SLP) guide the participant through generation of pertinent semantic features for pictured treatment items (e.g., category membership, physical description, location of item in context, personal associations, action associated with item). For some participants, treatment items were grouped according to typicality of category membership (e.g,, a robin-typical bird and penguin-atypical bird). Training of atypical items may stimulate a broader semantic activation of the category and thus, may promote greater generalization. Treatment was applied sequentially to sets of items in the context of single-subject, multiple baseline designs. In this way, replication of treatment effects could be evaluated within and across participants. Treatment was administered by certified SLPs three times per week until prescribed accuracy levels were met during nontreatment probes or a maximum number of treatment sessions was completed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of Wernicke's, Broca's, or Conduction aphasia with significant word-retrieval deficits
- At least 6 months post-onset of single, left-hemisphere stroke
- Minimum of high-school education
- Visual and auditory acuity sufficient for experimental tasks
- Nonverbal intelligence within normal limits
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed mental illness other than depression
- Neurological condition other than that which resulted in aphasia
- History of alcohol or substance abuse
- Non-native English speaker
- Premorbid history of speech/language disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148, United States
Related Publications (2)
Wambaugh JL, Mauszycki S, Cameron R, Wright S, Nessler C. Semantic feature analysis: incorporating typicality treatment and mediating strategy training to promote generalization. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 May;22(2):S334-69. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0070).
PMID: 23695909RESULTWambaugh JL, Mauszycki S, Wright S. Semantic feature analysis: Application to confrontation naming of actions in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013 Oct 28; 28(1):DOI:10.1080/02687038.2013.845739.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Julie Wambaugh
- Organization
- VA Salt Lake City Health Care System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julie L. Wambaugh, PhD
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2005
First Posted
July 29, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 2005
Primary Completion
February 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 24, 2014
Results First Posted
December 24, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-12