NCT00125242

Brief Summary

The purpose of this investigation is to further develop and test a treatment for word-finding problems in aphasia. The treatment is designed to strengthen meaning associations within categories of words (e.g., animals, tools, fruits). The treatment is also designed to be used as a search strategy in instances of word-finding difficulty. The study was devised to evaluate the extent to which treatment increases the ability to recall trained, as well as untrained, words.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2005

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2005

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 27, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 29, 2005

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2009

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 24, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

December 24, 2014

Status Verified

December 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

July 27, 2005

Results QC Date

November 21, 2014

Last Update Submit

December 22, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

AphasiaLanguage therapyRehabilitation of speech and language disordersSpeech-language pathology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Word Retrieval Accuracy

    Accuracy of naming of pictured treated and untreated items was assessed in probes conducted separate from treatment. Probes were conducted repeatedly throughout the study, from baseline (prior to treatment) to follow-up (6 weeks following treatment). All naming responses were scored using a 0-10 scale reflecting promptness and presence of errors; scores of 8-10 received an "accuate" score and scores of 0-7 received an "inaccurate" score. A percentage accuracy score was calculated for each experimental set of items for every probe session. Baseline probe scores were compared to end of treatment and follow-up probe scores to obtain individual effect sizes for each experimental list of items for each participant (i.e., several effect sizes were calculated for each participant). All effect sizes were utlized to obtain an average effect size for each participant; these averages were then utlized to obtain a group average.

    End of treatment and at 6 weeks post treatment

Study Arms (2)

Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA)

EXPERIMENTAL

Word retrieval treatment for aphasia.

Behavioral: Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA)Training

Participants for Stimuli Development

NO INTERVENTION

Non-brain-injured participants provided data for development of treatment stimuli.

Interventions

SFA entails having the speech-language pathologist (SLP) guide the participant through generation of pertinent semantic features for pictured treatment items (e.g., category membership, physical description, location of item in context, personal associations, action associated with item). For some participants, treatment items were grouped according to typicality of category membership (e.g,, a robin-typical bird and penguin-atypical bird). Training of atypical items may stimulate a broader semantic activation of the category and thus, may promote greater generalization. Treatment was applied sequentially to sets of items in the context of single-subject, multiple baseline designs. In this way, replication of treatment effects could be evaluated within and across participants. Treatment was administered by certified SLPs three times per week until prescribed accuracy levels were met during nontreatment probes or a maximum number of treatment sessions was completed.

Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA)

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of Wernicke's, Broca's, or Conduction aphasia with significant word-retrieval deficits
  • At least 6 months post-onset of single, left-hemisphere stroke
  • Minimum of high-school education
  • Visual and auditory acuity sufficient for experimental tasks
  • Nonverbal intelligence within normal limits

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed mental illness other than depression
  • Neurological condition other than that which resulted in aphasia
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse
  • Non-native English speaker
  • Premorbid history of speech/language disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Wambaugh JL, Mauszycki S, Cameron R, Wright S, Nessler C. Semantic feature analysis: incorporating typicality treatment and mediating strategy training to promote generalization. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 May;22(2):S334-69. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0070).

  • Wambaugh JL, Mauszycki S, Wright S. Semantic feature analysis: Application to confrontation naming of actions in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013 Oct 28; 28(1):DOI:10.1080/02687038.2013.845739.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AphasiaLanguage DisordersSpeech Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Communication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Julie Wambaugh
Organization
VA Salt Lake City Health Care System

Study Officials

  • Julie L. Wambaugh, PhD

    VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2005

First Posted

July 29, 2005

Study Start

July 1, 2005

Primary Completion

February 1, 2009

Study Completion

April 1, 2013

Last Updated

December 24, 2014

Results First Posted

December 24, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-12

Locations