NCT04777214

Brief Summary

Stroke often causes substantial problems in speaking or understanding speech. Treatments for these problems are currently very limited. Limited studies to date suggest that repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to the side of the brain opposite to the side on which the stroke occurred may improve language function. The investigators are testing this hypothesis by giving daily 20 minute sessions of repeated TMS to the right (unaffected) side of the brain; the investigators test language function with a variety of tests both before and after the treatment with TMS and subjects are required to undergo functional MRI scans before and after treatment. TMS is a procedure in which a coil is placed next to the head of the subject and an electrical current passes through the coil causing a magnetic field that, in turn, causes a small electric current in the portion of the brain underneath the coil.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 26, 2007

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 30, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2011

Completed
9.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 2, 2021

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 26, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

February 2, 2021

Results QC Date

April 20, 2021

Last Update Submit

October 27, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Boston Naming Test

    The Boston Naming Test is an assessment of confrontation naming, where a score ranges from 0 (no items named correctly) to 36 (all items named correctly)

    Baseline, 2 months and 6-months after the last rTMS treatment session

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Picture Description of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Exam

    Baseline and 2 months after the last rTMS treatment session

  • Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Exam - Word Discrimination Subtest

    Baseline and 2 months after the last rTMS treatment session

  • Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination - Commands Subtest

    Baseline and 2 months after the last rTMS treatment

Study Arms (2)

Active TMS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

There are 10 TMS sessions over 2 consecutive weeks in which 20 minutes (1200 pulses) of 1 Hz active TMS are delivered to a previously determined optimal response site in right frontal lobe.

Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Sham TMS

SHAM COMPARATOR

There are 10 TMS sessions over 2 consecutive weeks in which 20 minutes (1200 pulses) of 1 Hz TMS are delivered, however, the coil will be rotated 90 degrees during stimulation.

Device: Sham TMS

Interventions

Active TMS will be at 90% motor threshold

Active TMS
Sham TMSDEVICE

Sham TMS will be administered

Sham TMS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aphasic patients will have had single, unilateral left hemisphere ischemic stroke, which spared the supplementary motor area (SMA)
  • With the exception of lacunar infarcts less than ≤ 1.5 cm (as measured by neuroimaging), the stroke causing the patients' impairments must be the only stroke.
  • Aphasic patients will be at least 6 months post-stroke and have mild-severe, non-fluent speech
  • Participants must be able to understand the nature of the study, and give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with more than one stroke
  • Intracranial metallic bodies from prior neurosurgical procedure
  • Signs of increased intracranial pressure as assessed by ophthalmic exam and patient symptoms
  • Implanted pacemaker, medication pump, vagal nerve stimulator, deep brain stimulator, TENS unit or ventriculoperitoneal shunt
  • History of seizure or unexplained loss of consciousness during the year prior to the initiation of the study
  • Family history of epilepsy
  • Acute, unstable medical conditions
  • History of substance abuse within the last 6 months
  • Abnormal neurologic exam other than as signs of the condition studied in the present protocol
  • History of known structural brain abnormality other than as signs of the condition studied in the present protocol
  • History of tinnitus
  • History of bipolar disorder
  • Consumption of medicines known to lower the seizure threshold
  • History of head injury with unconsciousness lasting more than 5 minutes
  • Previous brain surgery
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aphasia

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Speech DisordersLanguage DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Results Point of Contact

Title
Samuel Cason
Organization
University of Pennsylvania

Study Officials

  • H. Branch Coslett, MD

    University of Pennsylvania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
The procedure for localizing the site of stimulation and TMS administration will be identical to the treatment arm, except the coil will be rotated 90 degrees during the process/administration.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study involves two arms. The study involves a sham treatment control for half of the patients; all patients randomized to the sham treatment will be enrolled in the treatment phase after completing the sham treatment. Patients will be randomly assigned to the treatment arm or the sham treatment arm of the study. There are 3 phases: a pre-treatment evaluation phase in which baseline language and imaging data are obtained and the optimal site for stimulation is determined; a treatment phase during which TMS is delivered on 10 occasions; and a post-treatment phase during which effects of the treatment will be assessed using behavioral measures as well as fMRI at 2 and 6-months. Participants in the sham arm will undergo the same behavioral testing, MRI, and fMRI that will be administered in the treatment protocol. After the 2-month follow up visit, patients in the sham arm will be told that they did not receive real TMS and will be offered the opportunity to enter the treatment arm.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Neurology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2021

First Posted

March 2, 2021

Study Start

June 26, 2007

Primary Completion

August 30, 2011

Study Completion

August 30, 2011

Last Updated

November 26, 2021

Results First Posted

November 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations